Literature DB >> 30022466

Cerebellar Structural Variations in Subjects with Different Hypnotizability.

E Picerni1,2, E L Santarcangelo3, D Laricchiuta4,5, D Cutuli4,5, L Petrosini4,5, G Spalletta4, F Piras4.   

Abstract

Hypnotizability-the proneness to accept suggestions and behave accordingly-has a number of physiological and behavioral correlates (postural, visuomotor, and pain control) which suggest a possible involvement of cerebellar function and/or structure. The present study was aimed at investigating the association between cerebellar macro- or micro-structural variations (analyzed through a voxel-based morphometry and a diffusion tensor imaging approach) and hypnotic susceptibility. We also estimated morphometric variations of cerebral gray matter structures, to support current evidence of hypnotizability-related differences in some cerebral areas. High (highs, N = 12), and low (lows, N = 37) hypnotizable healthy participants (according to the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, form A) were submitted to a high field (3 T) magnetic resonance imaging protocol. In comparison to lows, highs showed smaller gray matter volumes in left cerebellar lobules IV/V and VI at uncorrected level, with the results in left lobule IV/V maintained also at corrected level. Highs showed also gray matter volumes smaller than lows in right inferior temporal gyrus, middle and superior orbitofrontal cortex, parahippocampal gyrus, and supramarginal parietal gyrus, as well as in left gyrus rectus, insula, and middle temporal cortex at uncorrected level. Results of right inferior temporal gyrus survived also at corrected level. Analyses on micro-structural data failed to reveal any significant association. The here found morphological variations allow to extend the traditional cortico-centric view of hypnotizability to the cerebellar regions, suggesting that cerebellar peculiarities may sustain hypnotizability-related differences in sensorimotor integration and emotional control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellum; Diffusion tensor imaging; Hypnotizability; Individual differences; Voxel-based morphometry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30022466     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-018-0965-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  10 in total

1.  Cerebellum, Embodied Emotions, and Psychological Traits.

Authors:  Daniela Laricchiuta; Eleonora Picerni; Debora Cutuli; Laura Petrosini
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 3.650

2.  Cerebral Blood Flow in Healthy Subjects with Different Hypnotizability Scores.

Authors:  Anas Rashid; Enrica Laura Santarcangelo; Silvestro Roatta
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  Complex Role of Hypnotizability in the Cognitive Control of Pain.

Authors:  Enrica L Santarcangelo; Sybille Consoli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20

4.  Spectral and topological analyses of the cortical representation of the head position: Does hypnotizability matter?

Authors:  Esther Ibáñez-Marcelo; Lisa Campioni; Diego Manzoni; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Giovanni Petri
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Linear and non linear measures of pupil size as a function of hypnotizability.

Authors:  Antonio Lanatà; Alberto Greco; Mirco Ciardelli; Allison Uvelli; Elisabetta Fratini; Diego Manzoni; Enzo P Scilingo; Enrica L Santarcangelo; Laura Sebastiani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Macro- and micro-structural cerebellar and cortical characteristics of cognitive empathy towards fictional characters in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Debora Cutuli; Gianfranco Spalletta; Eleonora Picerni; Daniela Laricchiuta; Fabrizio Piras; Daniela Vecchio; Laura Petrosini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cerebellar engagement in the attachment behavioral system.

Authors:  G Spalletta; D Cutuli; Eleonora Picerni; D Laricchiuta; F Piras; L Petrosini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 8.  Is hypnotic assessment relevant to neurology?

Authors:  Lorenzo Fontanelli; Vincenzo Spina; Carmelo Chisari; Gabriele Siciliano; Enrica L Santarcangelo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.830

9.  Individual Traits and Pain Treatment: The Case of Hypnotizability.

Authors:  Enrica Laura Santarcangelo; Giancarlo Carli
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  The effects of the general anesthetic sevoflurane on neurotransmission: an experimental and computational study.

Authors:  Jonathan Mapelli; Daniela Gandolfi; Enrico Giuliani; Stefano Casali; Luigi Congi; Alberto Barbieri; Egidio D'Angelo; Albertino Bigiani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.