Literature DB >> 30021932

Irregularly timed electrical pulses reduce adaptation of retinal ganglion cells.

A Soto-Breceda1, T Kameneva, H Meffin, M Maturana, M R Ibbotson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Retinal prostheses aim to provide visual percepts to blind people affected by diseases caused by photoreceptor degeneration. One of the main challenges presented by current devices is neural adaptation in the retina, which is believed to be the cause of fading-an effect where artificially produced percepts disappear over a short period of time, despite continuous stimulation of the retina. We aim to understand the neural adaptation generated in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) during electrical stimulation. APPROACH: Current visual prostheses use electrical pulses with fixed frequencies and amplitudes modulated over hundreds of milliseconds to stimulate the retina. However, in nature, neuronal spiking occurs with stochastic timing, hence the information received naturally from other neurons by RGCs is irregularly timed. We used a single epiretinal electrode to stimulate and compare rat RGC responses to stimulus trains of biphasic pulses delivered at regular and random inter-pulse intervals (IPI), the latter taken from an exponential distribution. MAIN
RESULTS: Our observations suggest that stimulation with random IPIs result in lower adaptation rates than stimulation with constant IPIs at frequencies of 50 Hz and 200 Hz. We also found a high proportion of lower amplitude action potentials, or spikelets. The spikelets were more prominent at high stimulation frequencies (50 Hz and 200 Hz) and were less susceptible to adaptation, but it was not clear if they propagated along the axon. SIGNIFICANCE: Using random IPI stimulation in retinal prostheses reduces the decay of RGCs and this could potentially reduce fading of electrically induced visual perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30021932     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aad46e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  4 in total

1.  Color and cellular selectivity of retinal ganglion cell subtypes through frequency modulation of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Javad Paknahad; Kyle Loizos; Lan Yue; Mark S Humayun; Gianluca Lazzi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  A Novel Biomimetic Stimulator System for Neural Implant.

Authors:  Po-Min Wang; Stanislav Culaclii; William Yang; Yan Long; Jonathan Massachi; Yi-Kai Lo; Wentai Liu
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2019-05-20

3.  Retinal ganglion cell desensitization is mitigated by varying parameter constant excitation pulse trains.

Authors:  Wennan Li; Dorsa Haji Ghaffari; Rohit Misra; James D Weiland
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.147

Review 4.  Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Wei Tong; Hamish Meffin; David J Garrett; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.