Literature DB >> 30021833

Ultrasound-guided intravenous catheter survival impacted by amount of catheter residing in the vein.

Ananda Vishnu Pandurangadu1, Jared Tucker1, Abigail R Brackney1, Amit Bahl1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US)-guided peripheral IVs have a high failure rate. We explore the relationship between the quantity of catheter residing within the vein and the functionality of the catheter over time.
METHODS: This was a prospective, observational single-site study. Adult ED patients with US-guided IVs had the catheter visualised under ultrasound post-placement. IV placement time and catheter length residing in the vein was obtained. Exclusions included catheter not visualised, patient discharged from ED unless IV failed, <24 hour hospitalisation unless IV failed or patient self-removed IV.Inpatient follow-up occurred within 24, 48 and 72 hours from the IV placement time. Catheter functionality was noted. If the catheter failed, the time and reason for failure was documented.
RESULTS: 113 patients were enrolled; 27 were excluded. Of the 86 study subjects, 29 (33.7%) patients' IVs failed and 57 (66.3%) remained functional. Median time to IV failure was 15.6 hours. 100% of IVs failed when <30% of the catheter was in the vein; 32.4% of IVs failed when 30%-64% of the catheter was in the vein; no IVs failed when ≥65% of the catheter was in the vein (p<0.0002). The HR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.83), and for every 5% increase of catheter in vein, the hazard of the IV failing decreases by 29% (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The quantity of catheter residing in the vein is a key predictor of long-term functionality of US-guided IVs and is strongly associated with the hazard of failure within 72 hours. Catheter failure is high when <30% of the catheter resided in the vein. Optimum catheter survival occurs when ≥65% of the catheter is placed in the vein. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30021833     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2017-206803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  5 in total

1.  Use of the Ultrasound Technique as Compared to the Standard Technique for the Improvement of Venous Cannulation in Patients with Difficult Access.

Authors:  Ángeles Rodríguez-Herrera; Álvaro Solaz-García; Enrique Mollá-Olmos; Dolores Ferrer-Puchol; Francisca Esteve-Claramunt; Silvia Trujillo-Barberá; Pedro García-Bermejo; Jorge Casaña-Mohedo
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

2.  Extended dwell and standard ultrasound guided peripheral intravenous catheters: Comparison of durability and reliability.

Authors:  Christopher M Fung; Douglas R Stayer; Jason J Terrasi; Prasad R Shankar; James A Cranford; Michael T Cover; Ryan V Tucker; Robert D Huang; Nik Theyyunni
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.093

3.  UK Vessel Health and Preservation (VHP) Framework: a commentary on the updated VHP 2020.

Authors:  Carole Hallam; Andrea Denton; Valya Weston; Helen Dunn; Tim Jackson; Susan Keeling; Steve Hill
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2020-12-14

Review 4.  Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous cannulation in critically ill patients: a practical guideline.

Authors:  Pablo Blanco
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2019-10-17

Review 5.  Ultrasound-guided peripheral vascular catheterization in pediatric patients: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Nakayama; Jun Takeshita; Yasufumi Nakajima; Nobuaki Shime
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.