Literature DB >> 30021447

Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: An Update and Thoughts for Future Directions.

Kristine A Smith1, Abigail Pulsipher1,2, David A Gabrielsen1, Jeremiah A Alt1.   

Abstract

Background Potential biologic therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a growing field of interest and research. Biologics target specific immune cells or inflammatory pathways within a disease process, increasing drug efficacy while reducing complications. The success of biologics in other inflammatory conditions such as asthma and atopic dermatitis has spurred much of the corresponding research in CRS. A rapid expansion in the volume of research concerning biologic therapies with potential crossover to treating CRS has made it difficult to stay current. Furthermore, much of the literature has been focused on allergy, asthma, and immunology subspecialties. As the role for biologic therapies in CRS continues to expand, it is increasingly important for otolaryngologists to remain up to date on their progression. Objective The objectives of this review are to provide an update on the growing field of biologics for otolaryngologists who treat CRS and discuss potential future areas of research. Methods A literature review of biologic therapies studied in CRS was performed. In addition, a detailed review of all biologic therapies targeting inflammatory markers involved in Th1-, Th2-, and Th17-mediated inflammation was performed to identify potential areas for future research. The role for biologic therapies in CRS, endotypes of CRS, current biologic therapies studies in CRS, and future areas for research were reviewed. Results Sixty-nine unique biologic therapies have been developed for Th1-, Th2-, and Th17-mediated inflammation. Five biologics are currently being investigated for use in patients with CRS with nasal polyposis. Conclusions As the field of biologics continues to expand, remaining up to date on the current literature may help clinicians identify patients who may benefit from biologic therapies. In addition, ongoing research in other inflammatory disorders with shared pathophysiology to CRS may reveal other potential therapies for CRS that have not previously been investigated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Th1; Th17; Th2; biologic therapy; biologics; chronic rhinosinusitis; eosinophilia; inflammation; polyps; systemic therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30021447      PMCID: PMC6340111          DOI: 10.1177/1945892418787132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy        ISSN: 1945-8932            Impact factor:   2.467


  14 in total

Review 1.  A Critical Look at the Efficacy and Costs of Biologic Therapy for Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis.

Authors:  W Colby Brown; Brent Senior
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  T helper 2 differentiation is necessary for development of lymphedema.

Authors:  Catherine L Ly; Gabriela D García Nores; Raghu P Kataru; Babak J Mehrara
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 7.012

3.  Eosinophilic Otitis Media: Modern Aspects of Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Elena Shevchik; Valery Svistushkin; Galina Nikiforova; Anna Zolotova
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-18

4.  Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Lee-Yee Chong; Patorn Piromchai; Steve Sharp; Kornkiat Snidvongs; Katie E Webster; Carl Philpott; Claire Hopkins; Martin J Burton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-12

Review 5.  Targetable pathogenic mechanisms in nasal polyposis.

Authors:  Alexander L Schneider; Robert P Schleimer; Bruce K Tan
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.426

6.  Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Lee-Yee Chong; Patorn Piromchai; Steve Sharp; Kornkiat Snidvongs; Carl Philpott; Claire Hopkins; Martin J Burton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

7.  Latest advances in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps endotyping and biomarkers, and their significance for daily practice.

Authors:  Alma Aurelia Maniu; Maria Ida Perde-Schrepler; Corina Bianca Tatomir; Mihai Ionuţ Tănase; Maximilian George Dindelegan; Vlad Andrei Budu; Gheorghe Doinel Rădeanu; Marcel Cosgarea; Carmen Aurelia Mogoantă
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.033

8.  CD133, a Progenitor Cell Marker, is Reduced in Nasal Polyposis and Showed Significant Correlations with TGF-β1 and IL-8.

Authors:  Wagner Vargas Souza Lino; André Luis Lacerda Bachi; José Arruda Mendes Neto; Gabriel Caetani; Jônatas Bussador do Amaral; Rogério Pezato
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-25

Review 9.  Phage Display Derived Monoclonal Antibodies: From Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Mohamed A Alfaleh; Hashem O Alsaab; Ahmad Bakur Mahmoud; Almohanad A Alkayyal; Martina L Jones; Stephen M Mahler; Anwar M Hashem
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  The value of endoscopic sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Michael T Yim; Kristine A Smith; Jeremiah A Alt; Richard R Orlandi
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.