Literature DB >> 30021241

Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement in a Low-Middle Income Region in the Modern Era: Midterm Results from a Sub-Saharan Center.

Charles Mve Mvondo1, Marta Pugliese2, Jean Claude Ambassa1, Alessandro Giamberti1,3, Emanuele Bovio2, Ellen Dailor4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with mechanical heart valves remains a major concern in populations with limited resources and medical facilities. This study reports the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent mechanical valve implantation in a sub-Saharan center over an 8-year period.
METHODS: A total of 291 mechanical valves were implanted in 233 patients in our institution between February 2008 and June 2016. A total of 117 patients underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR, 50.2%), 57 had aortic valve replacement (AVR, 24.4%), and 59 underwent both AVR and MVR (double valve replacement [DVR], 25.7%). The mean age at surgery was 27.6 ± 13.4 years (range, 7-62 years). Rheumatic etiology was found in 80.6% of the patients. Hospital mortality, late deaths, and valve-related events were reviewed at follow-up (839 patient-years, range: 1-9.4 years, complete in 93%).
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality was 4.7% (11/233). The overall survival at 1 and 6 years for the whole cohort was 88.8 ± 2.1% and 78.7 ± 3.3%, respectively. The 6-year survival for AVR, MVR, and DVR was 89.3 ± 4.8%, 73.2 ± 5.4%, and 79.3 ± 5.8%, respectively (p = 0.15). The freedom from neurologic events and anticoagulation-related bleeding at 6 years was 93.1 ± 2.1% and 78.9 ± 3.7%, respectively. No patient had reoperation at follow-up. No case of prosthetic valve thrombosis was identified. Eight full-term pregnancies were reported.
CONCLUSION: This preliminary experience reports acceptable midterm results after mechanical heart valve implantation in our region. Both accurate surgical evaluation and strategies, either financial or social, facilitating patient's education and medical assistance are crucial to ensure good results. Long-term follow-up and further studies comparing current nonthrombogenic options are warranted to draw reliable conclusions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30021241     DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0171-6425            Impact factor:   1.827


  4 in total

Review 1.  A glimpse of hope: cardiac surgery in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Authors:  Peter Zilla; R Morton Bolman; Percy Boateng; Karen Sliwa
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04

2.  Factors associated with sub-optimal control of anticoagulation in patients with prosthetic heart valves taking oral anticoagulants in a sub-Saharan African setting.

Authors:  Tigist Chalachew; Dejuma Yadeta; Endale Tefera
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 1.167

3.  Effect of Different Nursing Interventions on Discharged Patients with Cardiac Valve Replacement Evaluated by Deep Learning Algorithm-Based MRI Information.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Qiong Zhou
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  A Study of the Nursing Intervention Based on Self-Efficacy Theory for Patients After Mechanical Heart Valve Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Fei Jiang; Yanjuan Lin; Sailan Li; Yanchun Peng; Xizhen Huang; Liangwan Chen
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.