BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images from three different devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. All eyes (n = 24) were imaged thrice each time with swept-source OCT (DRI OCT Triton Plus; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), spectral-domain OCTA (AngioVue; Optovue, Fremont, CA), and SD-OCT Angioplex (Cirrus HD-OCT 5000; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Outcome measures were foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, vessel density, spacing between large vessels (SLV), and spacing between small vessels (SSV). They were calculated using local fractal analyses and Frangi filter. RESULTS: The vascular parameters showed good to excellent repeatability (intraclass coefficient > 0.8) in the three devices. The FAZ area (P = .3) and vessel density of the superficial layer (P = .8) were similar between the devices. In the deep layer, vessel density was significantly higher (P = .02) with Angio-Vue images compared to those acquired using the other devices. However, SLV was significantly higher (P < .05) and SSV was significantly lower (P < .05) on Angioplex scans compared to other devices. Vessel parameters were significantly altered in Frangi-filtered images as compared to nonfiltered images. CONCLUSIONS: Vessel density showed good repeatability among the three devices, although there were differences in vessel parameters between the devices. Also, vessel parameters changed significantly after Frangi filtering. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:488-496.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images from three different devices. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study. All eyes (n = 24) were imaged thrice each time with swept-source OCT (DRI OCT Triton Plus; Topcon, Tokyo, Japan), spectral-domain OCTA (AngioVue; Optovue, Fremont, CA), and SD-OCT Angioplex (Cirrus HD-OCT 5000; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany). Outcome measures were foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, vessel density, spacing between large vessels (SLV), and spacing between small vessels (SSV). They were calculated using local fractal analyses and Frangi filter. RESULTS: The vascular parameters showed good to excellent repeatability (intraclass coefficient > 0.8) in the three devices. The FAZ area (P = .3) and vessel density of the superficial layer (P = .8) were similar between the devices. In the deep layer, vessel density was significantly higher (P = .02) with Angio-Vue images compared to those acquired using the other devices. However, SLV was significantly higher (P < .05) and SSV was significantly lower (P < .05) on Angioplex scans compared to other devices. Vessel parameters were significantly altered in Frangi-filtered images as compared to nonfiltered images. CONCLUSIONS: Vessel density showed good repeatability among the three devices, although there were differences in vessel parameters between the devices. Also, vessel parameters changed significantly after Frangi filtering. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018;49:488-496.]. Copyright 2018, SLACK Incorporated.
Authors: Kai Yuan Tey; Kelvin Teo; Anna C S Tan; Kavya Devarajan; Bingyao Tan; Jacqueline Tan; Leopold Schmetterer; Marcus Ang Journal: Eye Vis (Lond) Date: 2019-11-18