Literature DB >> 30020745

Cost of biologic treatment persistence or switching in rheumatoid arthritis.

Tao Gu1, Alex Mutebi, Bradley S Stolshek, Hiangkiat Tan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate total costs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who persisted on or switched from newly initiated biologic therapy. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective claims database analysis.
METHODS: This analysis included adults in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database with RA who initiated treatment with a biologic for RA (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, or tocilizumab) between January 2009 and November 2014. Total healthcare costs (plan- and patient-paid) were estimated for 1 year post index. Treatment persistence was defined as no discontinuation (ie, no refill gap >45 days) and no biologic switch.
RESULTS: Of 7468 patients, 45.2% persisted on the index biologic for at least 1 year without a refill gap and 16.7% switched to another biologic in the first year; other patients discontinued the index biologic (23.2%) or restarted after a refill gap (15.0%). Mean 1-year total healthcare costs per patient were $41,901 (95% CI, $40,855-$42,947) among persistent patients and $44,244 (95% CI, $40,820-$47,668) among switchers. In a multivariable analysis of all patients, switchers had 5% higher postindex costs on average than persistent patients (exp(β) = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), and etanercept had the lowest postindex costs (exp(β) ranged from 1.03 to 1.51 for other biologics relative to etanercept).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA who switched biologic therapy incurred higher 1-year total postswitch healthcare costs compared with patients who were persistent on the index biologic. Healthcare costs were lowest for patients who started on etanercept, particularly those who persisted on etanercept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30020745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  5 in total

1.  A Cost per Responder Model for Abatacept versus Adalimumab Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Seropositivity.

Authors:  Sang Hee Park; Xue Han; Francis Lobo; Sakina Nanji; Dipen Patel
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2020-10-15

2.  Real-world treatment persistence of golimumab in the management of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases in Europe: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Karin Luttropp; Mary Dozier; Nahila Justo; Freddy Cornillie; Sumesh Kachroo; Marinella Govoni; Stina Salomonsson; Christopher M Black; Ahmed Khalifa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Effectiveness and persistence of golimumab as a second biological drug in patients with spondyloarthritis: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Juan J Alegre-Sancho; Xavier Juanola; José M Rodríguez-Heredia; Javier Manero; Ignacio Villa-Blanco; Ana Laiz; María J Arteaga; Luis Cea-Calvo; Carlos M González
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 4.  Managing inadequate response to initial anti-TNF therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: optimising treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Peter C Taylor; Marco Matucci Cerinic; Rieke Alten; Jérôme Avouac; Rene Westhovens
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.625

5.  Penfluridol targets acid sphingomyelinase to inhibit TNF signaling and is therapeutic against inflammatory autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Yue-Hong Chen; Rong-Han Liu; Ya-Zhou Cui; Aubryanna Hettinghouse; Wen-Yu Fu; Lei Zhang; Chen Zhang; Chuan-Ju Liu
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.606

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.