| Literature DB >> 30020330 |
Raphael Dias de Mello Pereira1, Neide Aparecida Titonelli Alvim2, Claudia Dayube Pereira3, Saint Clair Dos Santos Gomes Junior4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the efficacy of a laser acupuncture protocol developed and applied by nurses in arterial hypertension patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30020330 PMCID: PMC6053295 DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.1887.2936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ISSN: 0104-1169
Figure 1Acupoints used, order of application and dwell time on each laser-acupoint. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2015
Figure 2Distribution of participants in the research. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2015
Distribution profile of participants in the research. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2015
| Arm | Gender | Started exposure | Finished exposure | Reduction (%) | Exposures (mean±SD†) | Exposures (median) | |||||
| n* | % | n* | % | n* | % | ||||||
| A | Female | 34 | 100 | 29 | 85.3 | 5 | 14.7 | 4.9±1.4 | 5 | ||
| Male | 17 | 100 | 14 | 82.4 | 3 | 17.6 | 4.9±1.3 | 5 | |||
| B | Female | 36 | 100 | 24 | 66.7 | 12 | 33.3 | 4.1±1.9 | 5 | ||
| Male | 15 | 100 | 12 | 80.0 | 3 | 20.0 | 4.9±1.7 | 6 | |||
| Total | 102 | 100 | 79 | 77.5 | 23 | 22.5 | 4.6±1.7 | 5 | |||
*n: Number of participants; †SD: Standard deviation
Mean SBP and DBP values in pre and post-exposure measurements in both arms of the study. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2015
| Arm | Exposure | Moment | SBP* | DBP† | |||
| Mean±SD‡ | P value§ | Mean±SD‡ | P value§ | ||||
| A | Pre | 1 | 161.0±18.1 | <0.001 | 96.1±7.1 | <0.001 | |
| 2 | 149.4±20.0 | 92.6±10.5 | |||||
| 3 | 142.7±20.1 | 87.0±11.6 | |||||
| 4 | 142.4±16.8 | 90.0±8.9 | |||||
| 5 | 137.4±15.1 | 83.4±9.9 | |||||
| 6 | 133.0±14.0 | 83.3±6.6 | |||||
| Post | 1 | 146.0±17.7 | <0.001 | 89.1±9.5 | <0.001 | ||
| 2 | 140.2±17.9 | 87.2±10.3 | |||||
| 3 | 137.1±16.9 | 86.1±9.6 | |||||
| 4 | 133.1±15.5 | 84.0±7.9 | |||||
| 5 | 128.0±12.3 | 81.2±9.1 | |||||
| 6 | 128.5±13.5 | 80.2±7.4 | |||||
| B | Pre | 1 | 160.5±16.7 | 0.056 | 98.6±8.4 | 0.062 | |
| 2 | 148.3±22.6 | 91.7±10.5 | |||||
| 3 | 149.9±19.2 | 92.0±10.5 | |||||
| 4 | 150.1±17.2 | 91.7±8.6 | |||||
| 5 | 151.9±18.1 | 92.4±9.8 | |||||
| 6 | 154.8±22.5 | 94.7±7.1 | |||||
| Post | 1 | 154.2±17.1 | 0.59 | 95.4±8.8 | 0.179 | ||
| 2 | 153.2±17.4 | 92.7±9.6 | |||||
| 3 | 152.6±18.5 | 92.5±8.5 | |||||
| 4 | 152.1±16.6 | 92.6±8.3 | |||||
| 5 | 149.9±21.4 | 91.7±12.2 | |||||
| 6 | 156.9±20.7 | 95.7±7.3 | |||||
*SBP: Systolic blood pressure; †DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; ‡SD: Standard deviation; §Obtained by Anova for repeated measures
Comparison between the results obtained for SBP and DBP in both arms of the study. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 2015
| Arm | Exposure | Moment | SBP* | P value§ | DBP† | P value§ |
| Mean±SD‡ | Mean±SD‡ | |||||
| A | Pre | 1 | 161.0±18.1 | <0.001 | 96.1±7.1 | <0.001 |
| 6 | 133.0±14.0 | 83.3±6.6 | ||||
| Post | 1 | 146.0±17.7 | <0.001 | 89.1±9.5 | <0.001 | |
| 6 | 128.5±13.5 | 80.2±7.4 | ||||
| B | Pre | 1 | 160.5±16.7 | 0.226 | 98.6±8.4 | 0.037 |
| 6 | 154.8±22.5 | 94.7±7.1 | ||||
| Post | 1 | 154.2±17.1 | 0.548 | 95.4±8.8 | 0.875 | |
| 6 | 156.9±20.7 | 95.7±7.3 |
*SBP: Systolic blood pressure; †DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; ‡SD: Standard deviation; §Obtained by Student’s t-test