Literature DB >> 30020231

Comparison of Pediatric Intercalary Allograft Reconstructions with and without a Free Vascularized Fibula.

Matthew T Houdek1, Peter S Rose1, Todd A Milbrandt1, Anthony A Stans1, Steven L Moran1, Franklin H Sim1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity intercalary allograft reconstruction has traditionally been used to facilitate limb salvage. Combining the allograft with a free vascularized fibula graft has been described; however, there is a paucity of data comparing the outcome of these reconstructions.
METHODS: Twenty-nine pediatric patients (15 boys and 14 girls) underwent lower extremity limb salvage with the use of intercalary cadaveric allograft at a mean age of 12 years. The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (n = 18). Patients underwent reconstruction with an allograft alone (n = 11) or supplemented with a free vascularized fibula graft (n = 18).
RESULTS: The mean time to union of the allograft was 11 months, with 10 patients requiring additional bone grafting. There was no difference in the need for an additional bone graft (OR, 0.87; p = 1.0) between patients with a free vascularized fibula graft and those without. The allograft was revised in three patients because of fracture (n = 2) and fracture and infection (n = 1). In all of these patients, the allograft was not supplemented with a free vascularized fibula graft (p < 0.001). Five patients underwent an amputation, most commonly for disease recurrence. At last follow-up, the mean Mankin and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating was 90 percent, with 19 patients (66 percent) who achieved a "good" or "excellent" outcome according to the Mankin score.
CONCLUSION: Use of an intercalary allograft to reconstruct a lower extremity provides a durable means of reconstruction; however, supplementation with a free vascularized fibula graft reduces the risk of allograft revision. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30020231     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  [Clinical application of three-dimensional printed osteotomy guide plate and personalized prosthesis in knee-preserving tumor resection].

Authors:  Weijian Liu; Baichuan Wang; Hongzhi Hu; Feifei Pu; Jianxiang Liu; Qiang Wu; Zhicai Zhang; Yingze Zhang; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2022-07-15

2.  3D Customized Biological Tibial Intramedullary Nail Fixation for the Treatment of Fracture after Massive Allograft Bone Transplantation of Tibial Osteosarcoma: A Case Report.

Authors:  Hongsheng Yang; Xiang Fang; Yan Xiong; Hong Duan; Wenli Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Does the Addition of a Vascularized Fibula Improve the Results of a Massive Bone Allograft Alone for Intercalary Femur Reconstruction of Malignant Bone Tumors in Children?

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Patricio A Alfaro; Virginia Ponz; Marco Colangeli; Davide Maria Donati; Marco Manfrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Hip-Preserved Reconstruction Using a Customized Cementless Intercalary Endoprosthesis With an Intra-Neck Curved Stem in Patients With an Ultrashort Proximal Femur: Midterm Follow-Up Outcomes.

Authors:  Qi You; Minxun Lu; Li Min; Yuqi Zhang; Jie Wang; Yitian Wang; Chuanxi Zheng; Yong Zhou; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  Intercalary reconstruction following resection of diaphyseal bone tumors: A systematic review.

Authors:  Costantino Errani; Shinji Tsukamoto; Nusaibah Almunhaisen; Andreas Mavrogenis; Davide Donati
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.