Literature DB >> 30020125

Risk-Based Hospital and Surgeon-Volume Categories for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Jayme C B Koltsov1,2, Robert G Marx2, Emily Bachner2, Alexander S McLawhorn2, Stephen Lyman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies of volume-outcome relationships typically subdivide volume via non-evidence-based methods, producing categories that vary widely among studies, preclude the comparison of results, and possibly obscure the true volume-outcome relationships. The goal of the current study was to use quantitative methods to derive meaningful, risk-based categories for hospital and surgeon total hip arthroplasty (THA) volume based on relationships with mortality, complications, and revision.
METHODS: Using New York statewide patient data (1997 to 2014; n = 187,557), we derived risk-based hospital and surgeon-volume categories for primary THA based on relationships with 90-day complications and mortality and 2-year revision.
RESULTS: The following categories, based on relationships with complications, mortality, and revision, were derived for surgeon volume: 0 to 12, 13 to 25, 26 to 72, 73 to 165, 166 to 279, and ≥280 THA/year. For hospital volume, the categories derived were 0 to 11, 12 to 54, 55 to 157, 158 to 526, and ≥527 THA/year. More than 35% of THA cases in New York State were conducted by surgeons performing ≤1 THA/month (0 to 12 THA/year), and these were associated with a 2 to 2.5-fold increase in the risk for complications, mortality, and revision relative to higher-volume surgeons. Similarly, 15% of THA cases in New York State were conducted in hospitals performing ≤1 THA/week (0 to 11 or 12 to 54 THA/year), and these were associated with a nearly 1.5-fold increase in complications and between a 4 and 6-fold increase in mortality. Traditional non-evidence-based quartile categories were concentrated at lower volumes, did not capture the full magnitude of the volume-related differences, and were a poorer representation of the outcome data, as assessed by several model metrics. Thus, quartiles showed only a <2-fold increase in complications, mortality, and revision for the lowest versus the highest surgeon-volume quartile and failed to show the increased risk for lower versus higher hospital volumes.
CONCLUSIONS: The volume-outcome relationships in THA are more pronounced than previously apparent through standard statistical techniques. Volume-based strategies for improving outcomes in THA should use benchmarks that are evidence-based to achieve optimal results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30020125     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  10 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Are Case Volume and Facility Complexity Level Associated With Postoperative Complications After Hip Fracture Surgery in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System?

Authors:  Brett A Freedman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: Pitfalls During the Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Christos Koutserimpas; Konstantinos Raptis; Despina Tsakalou; Ilias Karaiskos; Konstantinos Kourelis
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2021-09

3.  Physical and occupational therapist rehabilitation of lower extremity fractures in veterans with spinal cord injuries and disorders.

Authors:  Marylou Guihan; Kayla Roddick; Tomas Cervinka; Cara Ray; Christopher Sutton; Laura Carbone; Frances M Weaver
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes in joint arthroplasty: protocol for a suite of systematic reviews and dose-response meta-analyses.

Authors:  Xiang-Dong Wu; Meng-Meng Liu; Ya-Ying Sun; Zhi-Hu Zhao; Quan Zhou; Joey S W Kwong; Wei Xu; Mian Tian; Yao He; Wei Huang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  High annual surgeon volume reduces the risk of adverse events following primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based study of 12,100 cases in Western Sweden.

Authors:  Per Jolbäck; Ola Rolfson; Peter Cnudde; Daniel Odin; Henrik Malchau; Hans Lindahl; Maziar Mohaddes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Patients' perspectives of outcomes after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: a nominal group study.

Authors:  Susan M Goodman; Bella Mehta; Serene Z Mirza; Mark P Figgie; Michael Alexiades; Jose Rodriguez; Peter Sculco; Michael Parks; Jasvinder A Singh
Journal:  BMC Rheumatol       Date:  2020-01-13

7.  A small number of surgeons outside the control-limit: an observational study based on 9,482 cases and 208 surgeons performing primary total hip arthroplasties in western Sweden.

Authors:  Per Jolbäck; Emma Nauclér; Erik Bülow; Hans Lindahl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Primary Care Provider Density and Elective Total Joint Replacement Outcomes.

Authors:  Bella Mehta; Collin Brantner; Nicholas Williams; Jackie Szymonifka; Iris Navarro-Millan; Lisa A Mandl; Anne R Bass; Linda A Russell; Michael L Parks; Mark P Figgie; Joseph T Nguyen; Said Ibrahim; Susan M Goodman
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-07-09

9.  The Impact of COVID-19 on Total Joint Arthroplasty Fellowship Training.

Authors:  Jason Silvestre; Terry L Thompson; Charles L Nelson
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.435

Review 10.  Socioeconomic factors affecting outcomes in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review on healthcare disparities.

Authors:  Paul M Alvarez; John F McKeon; Andrew I Spitzer; Chad A Krueger; Matthew Pigott; Mengnai Li; Sravya P Vajapey
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2022-10-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.