Literature DB >> 30019858

Female mice exhibit both sexual and social partner preferences for vocalizing males.

Kensaku Nomoto1, Mayu Ikumi1, Monami Otsuka1, Akari Asaba1, Masahiro Kato2, Nobuyoshi Koshida3, Kazutaka Mogi1, Takefumi Kikusui1.   

Abstract

Acoustic signals are widely used as courtship signals in the animal kingdom. It has long been known that male mice emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in the presence of female mice or in response to female secretions. This observation led to the hypothesis that male USVs play a role in courtship behavior. Although previous studies showed that female mice have a social partner preference for vocalizing males, it is not known if they exhibit a sexual partner preference when given a choice. To address this issue, we examined the copulatory behaviors of female mice with either devocalized males (with or without the playback of the USVs) or sham-operated males in 2 different behavioral paradigms: the no-choice paradigm in the home cage of a male mouse (without choice of mating partners) or the mate-choice paradigm in a 3-chambered apparatus (with choice of mating partners). In the no-choice paradigm, female mice exhibited comparable sexual receptivity with sham-operated and devocalized males. In addition, we found that female mice showed more approach behavior towards devocalized males when male USVs were played back. In the mate-choice paradigm, female mice visited more frequently and stayed longer with sham-operated than devocalized males. Furthermore, we showed that female mice received more intromissions from sham-operated males than devocalized males. In summary, our results suggested that, although female mice can copulate equally with both devocalized and vocalizing males when given no choice of mating partner, female mice exhibit both sexual and social partner preferences for vocalizing males in the mate-choice paradigm.
© 2018 International Society of Zoological Sciences, Institute of Zoology/Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mate choice; mice; sexual partner preference; social partner preference; ultrasonic vocalizations

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30019858     DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Zool        ISSN: 1749-4869            Impact factor:   2.654


  5 in total

1.  Sexual experience has no effect on male mating or reproductive success in house mice.

Authors:  Kerstin E Thonhauser; Alexandra Raffetzeder; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Prelimbic cortex responds to male ultrasonic vocalizations in the presence of a male pheromone in female mice.

Authors:  Akari Asaba; Kensaku Nomoto; Takuya Osakada; Tomohiko Matsuo; Ko Kobayakawa; Reiko Kobayakawa; Kazushige Touhara; Kazutaka Mogi; Takefumi Kikusui
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 3.  Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.

Authors:  Constanze Lenschow; Ana Rita P Mendes; Susana Q Lima
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Testosterone Increases the Emission of Ultrasonic Vocalizations With Different Acoustic Characteristics in Mice.

Authors:  Takefumi Kikusui; Miku Sonobe; Yuuki Yoshida; Miho Nagasawa; Elodie Ey; Fabrice de Chaumont; Thomas Bourgeron; Kensaku Nomoto; Kazutaka Mogi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-25

5.  Alteration in the time and/or mode of delivery differentially modulates early development in mice.

Authors:  Morgane Chiesa; Diana C Ferrari; Yehezkel Ben-Ari
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.041

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.