K A Vercammen1, J M Frelier2, C M Lowery3, M E McGlone2, C B Ebbeling4, S N Bleich2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to summarize evidence for strategies designed to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption among children aged 0 to 5 years. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Cab Abstracts and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials are the electronic databases searched in this systematic review. STUDY SELECTION: Each included study evaluated an intervention to reduce SSB consumption in children aged 0 to 5 years, was conducted in a high-income country and was published between 1 January 2000 and 15 December 2017. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The primary intervention settings were healthcare (n = 11), preschool/daycare (n = 4), home (n = 3), community venues (n = 3) and other settings (n = 6). Overarching strategies which successfully reduced SSB consumption included (i) in-person individual education, (ii) in-person group education, (iii) passive education (e.g. pamphlets), (iv) use of technology, (v) training for childcare/healthcare providers and (vi) changes to the physical access of beverages. Studies were of moderate methodological quality (average score of 20.7/29.0 for randomized studies; 3.1/9.0 for non-randomized studies). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that interventions successful at reducing SSB consumption among 0-year to 5-year olds often focused on vulnerable populations, were conducted in preschool/daycare settings, specifically targeted only SSBs or only oral hygiene, included multiple intervention strategies and had higher intervention intensity/contact time.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to summarize evidence for strategies designed to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption among children aged 0 to 5 years. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, Cab Abstracts and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials are the electronic databases searched in this systematic review. STUDY SELECTION: Each included study evaluated an intervention to reduce SSB consumption in children aged 0 to 5 years, was conducted in a high-income country and was published between 1 January 2000 and 15 December 2017. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The primary intervention settings were healthcare (n = 11), preschool/daycare (n = 4), home (n = 3), community venues (n = 3) and other settings (n = 6). Overarching strategies which successfully reduced SSB consumption included (i) in-person individual education, (ii) in-person group education, (iii) passive education (e.g. pamphlets), (iv) use of technology, (v) training for childcare/healthcare providers and (vi) changes to the physical access of beverages. Studies were of moderate methodological quality (average score of 20.7/29.0 for randomized studies; 3.1/9.0 for non-randomized studies). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence suggests that interventions successful at reducing SSB consumption among 0-year to 5-year olds often focused on vulnerable populations, were conducted in preschool/daycare settings, specifically targeted only SSBs or only oral hygiene, included multiple intervention strategies and had higher intervention intensity/contact time.
Authors: Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva A Rehfuess Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: Anna H Grummon; Michael D Cabana; Amelie A Hecht; Abbey Alkon; Charles E McCulloch; Claire D Brindis; Anisha I Patel Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Matt Kasman; Ross A Hammond; Rob Purcell; Benjamin Heuberger; Travis R Moore; Anna H Grummon; Allison J Wu; Jason P Block; Marie-France Hivert; Emily Oken; Ken Kleinman Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2022-10-06 Impact factor: 8.472
Authors: Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva Rehfuess Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-06-12
Authors: Carmen B Franse; Mirte Boelens; Lisa R Fries; Florence Constant; Amy van Grieken; Hein Raat Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Jacklyn Kay Jackson; Jannah Jones; Hanh Nguyen; Isabella Davies; Melanie Lum; Alice Grady; Sze Lin Yoong Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 3.390