Literature DB >> 30019353

Development and validation of the Moral Distress in Dementia Care Survey instrument.

Olu Awosoga1, Em M Pijl1, Brad Hagen1, Barry Hall2, Tolulope Sajobi3, Shannon Spenceley1.   

Abstract

AIMS: To report on the development and validation of the Moral Distress in Dementia Care Survey instrument.
BACKGROUND: Despite growing awareness of moral distress among nurses, little is known about the moral distress experiences of nursing staff in dementia care settings. To address this gap, our research team developed a tool for measuring the frequency, severity and effects of moral distress in nursing staff working in dementia care.
DESIGN: The research team employed an exploratory sequential mixed method design to generate items for the moral distress questionnaire. Data were collected between January 2013 - June 2014. In this paper, we report on the development and validation of the Moral Distress in Dementia Care Survey instrument.
METHODS: The Moral Distress in Dementia Care Survey instrument was piloted with a portion of the target population prior to a broader implementation. Appropriate statistical analyses and psychometric testing were completed.
RESULTS: The team collected 389 completed surveys from registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and healthcare aides, representing a 43.6% response rate across 23 sites. The Moral Distress in Dementia Care Survey emerged as a reliable and valid instrument to measure the frequency, severity and effects of moral distress for nursing staff in dementia care settings. The relative value of the Moral Distress in Dementia Care Survey as a measurement instrument was superseded by its clinical relevance for dementia care staff.
CONCLUSION: The Moral Distress in Dementia Care Survey is a potentially useful tool for estimating the frequency, severity and effects of moral distress in nursing staff working in dementia care settings and for the evaluation of measures taken to mitigate moral distress.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethical issues; homes for the aged; instrument development; licensed practical nurses; long-term care; moral distress; nurses; nursing; nursing aides; psychometric testing; registered nurses; supervisory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30019353     DOI: 10.1111/jan.13803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  4 in total

1.  Prevalence, causes, and consequences of moral distress in healthcare providers caring for people living with dementia in long-term care during a pandemic.

Authors:  Lynn Haslam-Larmer; Alisa Grigorovich; Hannah Quirt; Katia Engel; Steven Stewart; Kevin Rodrigues; Pia Kontos; Arlene Astell; Josephine McMurray; AnneMarie Levy; Kathleen S Bingham; Alastair J Flint; Colleen Maxwell; Andrea Iaboni
Journal:  Dementia (London)       Date:  2022-10-14

2.  Barriers and facilitators to person-centred infection prevention and control: results of a survey about the Dementia Isolation Toolkit.

Authors:  Andrea Iaboni; Hannah Quirt; Katia Engell; Julia Kirkham; Steven Stewart; Alisa Grigorovich; Pia Kontos; Josephine McMurray; AnneMarie Levy; Kathleen Bingham; Kevin Rodrigues; Arlene Astell; Alastair J Flint; Colleen Maxwell
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Instruments for Detecting Moral Distress in Clinical Nurses: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Xu Tian; Yanfei Jin; Hui Chen; María F Jiménez-Herrera
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 4.  Moral Distress Scores of Nurses Working in Intensive Care Units for Adults Using Corley's Scale: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Noemi Giannetta; Giulia Villa; Loris Bonetti; Sara Dionisi; Andrea Pozza; Stefano Rolandi; Debora Rosa; Duilio Fiorenzo Manara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.