Ray O'Connor1,2, Cliodhna O'Callaghan3, Roisin McNamara3, Umbreen Salim3. 1. Department of General Practice, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. Raymond.oconnor@ul.ie. 2. Mid-Western Specialist Training Programme in General Practice, Room GEMS 1-019, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. Raymond.oconnor@ul.ie. 3. Mid-Western Specialist Training Programme in General Practice, Room GEMS 1-019, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health is information-intensive. Reliable health care depends on access to this information in a timely and accurate manner. A standardised data set for clinical discharge summaries is essential to optimise the care the patient receives, particularly at discharge. The Irish Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) have recently developed a national standard for patient discharge summaries. AIMS: Our aim was to assess the current quality of discharge summaries being received, determine the main areas of concern and establish the areas to improve patient safety. METHODS: We studied 60 discharge summaries received at 3 general practices in the Mid-West of Ireland. We used HIQA "National Standard for Patient Discharge Summary" 2013 as our audit standard. RESULTS: Mandatory fields including Surname, Forename and date of birth were present in 100%, missing in 0%. The patient's address was missing in 7% (n = 4). Gender was missing in 82% (n = 50). Source of referral was missing in 52% (n = 32). No method of admission was documented in 70% (n = 43). Whilst principal diagnosis was documented in 100% (n = 60), no co-morbidities were documented in 28% (n = 17). No medication was documented in 30% (n = 18), and there was no documentation of medication changed in 39% (n = 24). Details of the person completing the discharge summary were incomplete as follows: 85% (n = 52) had no specialty documentation, 36% (n = 22) had no registration number and 38% (n = 23) had no contact number. CONCLUSIONS: This audit shows deficits in adhering to HIQA standards. These must be addressed as a matter of urgency.
BACKGROUND: Health is information-intensive. Reliable health care depends on access to this information in a timely and accurate manner. A standardised data set for clinical discharge summaries is essential to optimise the care the patient receives, particularly at discharge. The Irish Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA) have recently developed a national standard for patient discharge summaries. AIMS: Our aim was to assess the current quality of discharge summaries being received, determine the main areas of concern and establish the areas to improve patient safety. METHODS: We studied 60 discharge summaries received at 3 general practices in the Mid-West of Ireland. We used HIQA "National Standard for Patient Discharge Summary" 2013 as our audit standard. RESULTS: Mandatory fields including Surname, Forename and date of birth were present in 100%, missing in 0%. The patient's address was missing in 7% (n = 4). Gender was missing in 82% (n = 50). Source of referral was missing in 52% (n = 32). No method of admission was documented in 70% (n = 43). Whilst principal diagnosis was documented in 100% (n = 60), no co-morbidities were documented in 28% (n = 17). No medication was documented in 30% (n = 18), and there was no documentation of medication changed in 39% (n = 24). Details of the person completing the discharge summary were incomplete as follows: 85% (n = 52) had no specialty documentation, 36% (n = 22) had no registration number and 38% (n = 23) had no contact number. CONCLUSIONS: This audit shows deficits in adhering to HIQA standards. These must be addressed as a matter of urgency.
Entities:
Keywords:
Content; Discharge summary; Hospital; Patient; Secondary care
Authors: Elaine K Walsh; Laura J Sahm; Colin P Bradley; Kieran Dalton; Kathleen O'Sullivan; Stephen McCarthy; Eimear Connolly; Ciara Fitzgerald; William H Smithson; David Kerins; Derina Byrne; Patricia M Kearney Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Letícia Bianchini de Barros; Laura Passos Caldas; Elena Bohomol; Alice Sarantopoulos; Vinicius Minatogawa; Renata Cristina Gasparino Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Maria Raisa Jessica Ryc Aquino; Ricky Mullis; Caroline Moore; Elizabeth Kreit; Lisa Lim; Christopher McKevitt; Bundy Mackintosh; Jonathan Mant Journal: Int J Integr Care Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 5.120
Authors: Gloria Reig-Garcia; Anna Bonmatí-Tomàs; Rosa Suñer-Soler; Mari Carmen Malagón-Aguilera; Sandra Gelabert-Vilella; Cristina Bosch-Farré; Susana Mantas-Jimenez; Dolors Juvinyà-Canal Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-05-28 Impact factor: 2.908