| Literature DB >> 30018893 |
Seung Min Park1, Jisun Oh1, Jung Eun Kim1, Jong-Sang Kim1.
Abstract
Doenjang, a major traditional Korean condiment, is often dried to reduce volume and thereby shipping cost while increasing shelf life. However, changes of nutritional and sensory properties of doenjang during processing have not been well understood. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate how drying processes influence the nutritional and chemical properties of doenjang. When two drying methods, hot air drying and freeze drying were compared from the nutritional point of view, air-dried doenjang at 60°C or lower showed similar quality parameters including sensory scores, proximate composition, antioxidant capacity, amino acid composition, amino nitrogen, and acid value to freeze-dried doenjang. In contrast, the sample dried at 80°C and 100°C showed lower quality parameters than the freeze-dried one. Ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP), total phenolics content, amino acid composition, and acid value were shown to reflect the sensory and physical properties of dried doenjang. In particular, the FRAP value of dried doenjang was sensitively responsive to drying temperatures and may be utilized as an early biomarker for quality deterioration of dried doenjang.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; drying; nutrients; quality; traditional doenjang
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018893 PMCID: PMC6047869 DOI: 10.3746/pnf.2018.23.2.144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2287-1098
Operating conditions for HPLC analysis of isoflavones
| Description | Condition |
|---|---|
| Column | Gemini C18, 5 μm, 2.0×150 mm |
| Column oven temp. | 25°C |
| Detector | Diode array detector, 254 nm |
| Mobile phase | A: 0.1 % acetic acid in water |
| Flow rate | 0.8 mL/min |
| Injection volume | 10 μL |
| Composition of mobile phase | A:B=85:15 (0 min)→60:40 (30 min)→ 85:15 (40 min) |
Fig. 1Drying curve of traditional doenjang. Fifty gram of traditional doenjang obtained from Andong Jebiwon Agricultural Corp. was dried in convection oven at 45, 60, 80, and 100°C and weighed every 30 min until reached constant weight.
Fig. 2Antioxidant activity of doenjang dried under different conditions. Doenjang dried under different conditions was extracted with 80% ethanol and then subjected to antioxidant activity assays such as DPPH (A) and ABTS+ (B) radical scavenging assays, and FRAP assay (C). Data are mean±SD (n=3). Bars not sharing a common letter (a–d) in same concentration group represent statistically significantly different values from each other (P<0.05). NS, not significant.
Total phenolics and flavonoids contents and isoflavone composition of dried doenjang (unit: μg/g db)
| Total phenolics | Total flavonoids | Isoflavones | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Genistein | Daidzein | Glycitein | |||
| Freeze dried | 499.7±10.9b | 1,493.2±8.4b | 766.9±6.3ab | 559.8±5.9ab | 283.0±4.9b |
| Hot air drying | |||||
| 45°C | 391.7±9.1d | 1,457.2±70.6b | 744.1±11.4ab | 533.5±10.0b | 297.6±29.5ab |
| 60°C | 428.3±13.8c | 1,700.0±46.3a | 704.9±19.5b | 511.2±6.2b | 274.2±25.3b |
| 80°C | 355.1±18.2e | 1,529.7±33.5b | 825.7±108.0a | 602.9±71.8a | 332.7±33.6a |
| 100°C | 579.9±15.7a | 1,634.5±39.8a | 808.6±15.7a | 621.7±15.5a | 329.6±15.4a |
Total phenolic, total flavonoid, and isoflavone contents of doenjang dried under various conditions were assayed according to the protocols described in ‘MATERIALS AND METHODS’.
Data are mean±SD (n=3).
Values not sharing a common letter (a–e) are statistically significantly different from each other (P<0.05).
Gallic acid equivalent.
Naringin equivalent.
Proximate composition and quality parameters of doenjang dried under different conditions
| Freeze dried | Hot air drying | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 45°C | 60°C | 80°C | 100°C | ||
| Ash (%) | 12.9±0.0 | 12.9±0.0 | 12.9±0.0 | 12.9±0.0 | 12.9±0.0 |
| Crude protein (%) | 21.5±0.0b | 25.5±0.0a | 19.1±0.0c | 17.6±0.0d | 25.9±0.0a |
| Crude fat (%) | 22.6±0.0a | 17.4±0.0b | 17.3±0.0b | 16.4±0.1c | 16.7±0.1c |
| Salt concentration (%) | 60 | 62 | 60 | 56 | 60 |
| pH | 5.9 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.3 | 4.9 |
| Total acids (%) | 2.6 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.6 |
| Acid value (mg KOH/g) | 29.6±2.0bc | 31.6±1.7ab | 30.6±1.2b | 27.4±0.0c | 33.5±1.4a |
| Amino N (mg %) | 865.8 | 799.4 | 772.7 | 798.5 | 739.4 |
| Total free amino acids (mg/g) | 83.4 | 83.8 | 84.2 | 88.6 | 87.6 |
| 2-Phenylethylamine (mg/g) | 2.35 | 3.02 | 2.66 | 2.23 | 2.13 |
| Histamine (mg/g) | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
Data are mean±SD (n=3).
Values not sharing a common letter (a–c) are statistically significantly different from each other (P<0.05).
The parameters other than proximate composition and acid value were values from a single measurement.
Free amino acid composition of doenjang dried under different conditions (unit: μg/g)
| Free amino acids | Freeze dried | Hot air dried | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 45°C | 60°C | 80°C | 100°C | ||
| Phosphoserine | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Taurine | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Phosphoethanol amine | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Urea | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Aspartic acid | 2,104.63 | 2,128.95 | 2,058.92 | 2,077.93 | 2,042.94 |
| Threonine | 3,313.99 | 3,349.12 | 3,551.97 | 4,407.07 | 4,420.17 |
| Serine | 1,321.68 | 1,318.81 | 1,482.59 | 1,921.58 | 1,895.72 |
| Glutamic acid | 3,789.57 | 3,715.36 | 3,719.62 | 4,219.95 | 4,055.26 |
| Sarcosine | 15.04 | 17.22 | 16.27 | 12.83 | 29.04 |
| α-Amino adipic acid | 773.04 | 762.69 | 766.19 | 825.79 | 813.16 |
| Glycine | 4,398.86 | 4,390.67 | 4,228.85 | 4,273.12 | 4,236.02 |
| Alanine | 9,787.03 | 9,781.97 | 9,608.61 | 9,746.25 | 9,701.89 |
| Citrulline | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| α-Amino- | 1,989.76 | 2,119.67 | 1,385.04 | 972.48 | 1,019.12 |
| Valine | 5,993.62 | 6,125.71 | 6,137.41 | 6,360.48 | 6,096.60 |
| Cystine | 597.80 | 651.26 | 641.16 | 545.16 | 436.60 |
| Methionine | 2,232.14 | 2,190.96 | 2,141.32 | 2,168.67 | 2,106.26 |
| Cystathionine | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Isoleucine | 5,899.42 | 5,968.42 | 5,953.27 | 6,132.27 | 6,222.91 |
| Leucine | 11,232.13 | 11,331.96 | 11,224.81 | 11,299.74 | 11,391.40 |
| Tyrosine | 1,728.97 | 1,719.12 | 2,344.58 | 3,715.82 | 2,992.21 |
| Phenylalanine | 6,614.60 | 6,657.76 | 6,981.22 | 7,372.41 | 7,202.92 |
| β-Alanine | 183.94 | 283.71 | 338.16 | 321.29 | 214.88 |
| β-Amino isobutyric acid | 126.85 | 128.41 | 622.78 | 704.24 | 572.89 |
| γ-Amino- | 12,777.12 | 12,926.22 | 12,609.79 | 13,031.51 | 12,720.77 |
| Ethanolamine | 132.62 | 133.42 | 126.18 | 129.82 | 126.75 |
| Hydroxylysine | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Ornithine | 2,183.28 | 2,156.84 | 2,075.23 | 2,204.57 | 2,164.97 |
| Lysine | 9,160.52 | 9,085.56 | 8,737.37 | 9,146.46 | 9,047.05 |
| 1-Methylhistidine | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Histidine | 623.42 | 601.86 | 735.15 | 1,066.10 | 1,013.18 |
| 3-Methylhistidine | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Anserine | 216.64 | 299.41 | 338.42 | 389.99 | 377.84 |
| Carnosine | 11.50 | 10.76 | 11.79 | 8.91 | 11.12 |
| Arginine | 204.87 | 205.73 | 205.71 | 186.41 | 187.80 |
| Hydroxyl proline | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1.48 |
| Proline | 5,313.56 | 5,389.03 | 5,512.10 | 5,230.70 | 6,301.28 |
| Total free amino acid | 92,726.61 | 93,180.60 | 93,554.52 | 98,471.56 | 97,402.23 |
ND, not detected.
Color of doenjang powder dried under different conditions
| Color values | Drying method | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Freeze dried | Hot air dried | ||||
|
| |||||
| 45°C | 60°C | 80°C | 100°C | ||
| L | 71.33±0.24a | 53.71±0.16c | 52.74±0.03d | 54.42±0.36b | 49.29±0.12e |
| a | 4.50±0.03e | 7.39±0.03d | 8.38±0.10c | 8.66±0.06b | 9.05±0.01a |
| b | 21.36±0.14b | 21.06±0.07c | 19.09±0.07d | 21.67±0.23a | 18.28±0.08e |
| ΔE*ab | 30.98±0.26c | 43.85±0.17b | 43.74±0.03b | 44.13±0.38b | 46.39±0.14a |
Data are mean±SD (n=3).
Values not sharing a common alphabetical letter are statistically significantly different from each other (P<0.05).
Sensory characteristics of doenjang dried under different conditions
| Freeze dried | Hot air dried | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 45°C | 60°C | 80°C | 100°C | ||
| Color | 2.9±1.2a | 3.3±1.1a | 3.3±1.3a | 2.9±1.4a | 2.5±1.0b |
| Odor | 2.7±1.3 | 3.0±0.7 | 3.1±0.7 | 3.2±1.5 | 3.0±1.2 |
| Umami taste | 3.0±0.7a | 2.9±1.0a | 2.4±1.1b | 2.1±1.2c | 2.4±1.0c |
| Salty taste | 3.0±1.0a | 2.6±0.7a | 3.0±0.9a | 1.5±1.1b | 2.4±1.0a |
| Bitterness | 1.8±1.1a | 1.9±0.9a | 2.2±1.1a | 2.7±1.2ab | 2.9±1.0b |
| Overall acceptability | 3.0±1.05a | 2.5±0.9b | 3.2±1.1a | 2.4±1.4b | 2.0±0.9c |
Data are mean±SD (n=10).
Values not sharing a common letter (a–c) are statistically significantly different from each other (P<0.05).
The samples were organoleptically assessed by ten panelists, using a sensory rating scale of 1~5 for six parameters.
, not significant.