| Literature DB >> 30018657 |
Fang Lai1,2,3, Gengbiao Zhou1,2, Shutao Mai1,2, Xiaolian Qin4, Wenting Liu5, Yan Zhang1,2, Dongping Xie1,2, Yanna Weng1,2, Jiongdong Du1,2, Yi Zheng6, Jiyang Liao6, Yun Han1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sini Decoction (SND) is composed of Aconitum carmichaelii Debeaux, Zingiber officinale Roscoe, and Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch, having been used in China for centuries for collapsing phrase of disease. Studies reported that SND could alleviate inflammatory response, ameliorate microcirculatory disturbances, and improve shock reversal and adrenal gland glucocorticoid stress response during sepsis shock, yet the underlying mechanism is still elusive. Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 is demonstrated to be crucially correlated with the corticosterone secretion and the impaired adrenal glucocorticoid responses in sepsis.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018657 PMCID: PMC6029449 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5186158
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Oral administration of medicine was conducted once a day for 3 days, starting from the day after induction of CLP.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 10 | Sham | Distilled water (10ml/kg) |
| CLP | 20 | CLP | Distilled water (10ml/kg) |
| LD-SND | 20 | CLP | Low dose of SND (10g/kg) |
| HD-SND | 20 | CLP | High dose of SND(20g/kg) |
Primers list for real-time PCR analysis.
| Gene | Primer | Sequence (5′~3′) |
|---|---|---|
| TLR4 | F | GGGGCAGTAGTAGGTGCTCAA |
| R | GCCTGTGTTCAGTTTCCATTC | |
| TNF-a | F | GCGCCCAGCCTTCCTTAC |
| R | GCCCCGGCCTTCCAAATAAATAC | |
| IL-10 | F | TTGAACCACCCGGCATCTAC |
| R | CCAAGGAGTTGCTCCCGTTA | |
| GAPDH | F | GATGCAGAAGGAGATCACTGC |
| R | ATACTCCTGCTTGCTGATCCA |
F: forward primer; R: reverse primer.
Figure 1Survival rates between 4 groups (n = 10 for the sham group, n = 20 for the rest three groups) within 4 days. ∗∗P < 0.01 versus sham group; #P < 0.05 versus CLP group.
Figure 2Comparison of plasma corticosterone from the time before ACTH stimulation to 60 mins after ACTH stimulation between the four groups (n = 7 per group, P = 0.58 by Repeated Measures of General Linear Model). ○P < 0.05 versus T0 values of the respective group (by paired T test).
Figure 3Comparison of plasma ACTH (n = 7 per group) and the increase of serum corticosterone (n = 7 per group) 30 mins and 60 mins after ACTH stimulation between the four groups, all comparing to other groups of the respective time. ∗P < 0.05 versus sham group; ∗∗P < 0.01 versus sham group; #P < 0.05 versus CLP group.
Figure 4TLR4 protein and mRNA expression in adrenal tissue 4 days after CLP (n = 4 per group). ∗P < 0.05 versus sham group; ∗∗P < 0.01 versus sham group; #P < 0.05 versus CLP group; ##P < 0.01 versus CLP group.
Figure 5TNF-a and IL-10 mRNA expression in adrenal tissue 4 days after CLP (n = 4 per group), ∗∗P < 0.01 versus sham group; #P < 0.05 versus CLP group; ##P < 0.01 versus CLP group.
Figure 6Comparison of the mean levels of IL-10 and TNF-a in the plasma of rats with different treatment. Data are presented in pg/mL as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 5 per group). ∗∗P < 0.01 versus sham group; #P < 0.05 versus CLP group.