| Literature DB >> 30018384 |
Edyta Łokas1, Krzysztof Zawierucha2, Anna Cwanek3, Katarzyna Szufa3, Paweł Gaca4, Jerzy W Mietelski3, Ewa Tomankiewicz3.
Abstract
Cryoconite granules are mixtures of mineral particles, organic substances and organisms on the surface of glaciers where they decrease the ice albedo and are responsible for formation of water-filled holes. The contaminants are effectively trapped in the cryoconite granules and stay there for many years. This study evaluates the contamination level of artificial and natural radionuclides in cryoconite holes from Adishi glacier (Georgia) and identifies the sources of contamination based on activity or mass ratios among artificial radionuclides. Results revealed high activity concentrations of fallout radionuclides reaching 4900 Bq/kg, 2.5 Bq/kg, 107 Bq/kg and 68 Bq/kg for 137Cs, 238Pu, 239+240Pu and 241Am, respectively. The main source of Pu is global fallout, but the low 240Pu/239Pu atomic ratios also indicated local tropospheric source of 239Pu, probably from the Kapustin Yar nuclear test site. Also, high activity ratios of 241Am/239+240Pu could originate from Kapustin Yar. The natural radionuclides originate from the surrounding rocks and were measured to control the environmental processes. 210Pb in cryoconite granules comes predominantly from the atmospheric deposition, and its activity concentrations reach high values up to 12000 Bq/kg.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018384 PMCID: PMC6050279 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29076-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Study area. Map of the Georgia: star indicates sampling area, inserted picture shows the cryoconite hole on Adishi Glacier with a map of the World: frame indicate Caucasus region and Georgia(A) (Permission for using figures is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:GNU_Free_Documentation_License,_version_1.2). The links to original files are https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BlankMap-Caucasus.png#filelinks (under licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en), https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BlankMap-World-v2.png (under licence https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en) respectively); Adishi Glacier where the samples were collected (B); cryoconite holes from Adishi Glacier (2 C,D); cryoconites granules, scale bar 0.5 mm (2 E); view of Adishi Glacier (source: Google Earth; US Dept of State Geographer ©2018 Google, Image Landsat/Copernicus, Image ©2018 DigitalGlobe), scale bar 0.5 km (F); view of Adishi Glacier tongue with marked sampling points (source: Google Earth), scale bar 0.25 km (G) (all black shapes and description were added to original pictures).
Figure 2Activity concentrations of airborne radionuclides (239+240Pu, 241Am, 90Sr) (2A) and (137Cs and 210Pb) (2B) in cryoconite samples.
Figure 3Regression plots for Pu isotopes (3 A) vs Am (3 B) and Cs (3 C) for all cryoconite samples.
Figure 4Activity ratios (4 A) and atomic ratios (4 B) for all cryoconite samples with reference lines.
Figure 5Activity concentrations of natural radionuclides (U and Th isotopes) in all cryoconite samples.