| Literature DB >> 30018205 |
Shuai Hu1, Zhenyu Chen2, Xingpeng Guo3,4.
Abstract
A novel and simple method to improve the corrosion resistance of copper by constructing a three-dimensional (3D)Entities:
Keywords: 1-dodecanethiol SAM; 3D nanostructures; copper; phosphoric acid
Year: 2018 PMID: 30018205 PMCID: PMC6073992 DOI: 10.3390/ma11071225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a,b) copper surface treated with H3PO4 solution; (c) copper surface with 1-dodecanethiol self-assembled monolayers (SAM); (d,e) copper surface-treated with H3PO4 solution and modified with 1-dodecanethiol SAM; (f) energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping; (g) cross section of bare copper with 1-dodecanethiol SAM; and, (h) cross section of H3PO4 treated copper with 1-dodecanethiol SAM.
Figure 2X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of major elements on copper surface treated with H3PO4 solution and modified with 1-dodecanethiol SAM: (a) XPS; (b) C 1s; (c) Cu 2p; (d) O 1s; (e) P 2p; and (f) S 2p.
The atomic ratios (%) of elements on detected samples.
| Sample | C | Cu | O | P | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu/H3PO4 | 73.25 | 8.19 | 14.36 | 4.19 | - |
| Cu/1-dodecanethiol | 75.07 | 15.31 | 7.58 | - | 2.03 |
| Cu/H3PO4/1-dodecanethiol | 81.19 | 5.01 | 3.51 | 3.61 | 6.67 |
Figure 3X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of Cu3(PO4)2 nanoflower.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of (a) copper surface treated with H3PO4 solution; (b) copper surface with 1-dodecanethiol SAM; and, (c) copper surface treated with H3PO4 solution and modified with 1-dodecanethiol SAM.
Figure 5Contact angle of water droplets on (a) bare copper surface; (b) H3PO4-treated copper surface; (c) copper surface with 1-dodecanethiol SAM; and, (d) H3PO4-treated copper surface with 1-dodecanethiol SAM.
Figure 6Potentiodynamic polarization curves of copper electrode with or without H3PO4 solution treatment.
Polarization parameters of copper electrode with and without H3PO4 solution treatment.
| Sample | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | −243 | 116 | −60 | 6.60 × 10−6 |
| Cu/H3PO4 | −248 | 98 | −66 | 7.81 × 10−6 |
Figure 7Nyquist plots of copper electrode with or without H3PO4 solution treatment.
Figure 8Equivalent circuits used for fitting impedance data: (a) bare copper electrode and copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM; (b) H3PO4-treated copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM.
Electrochemical impedance parameters of copper electrode with and without H3PO4 solution treatment.
| Sample | CPEf |
| CPEdl |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 3 | 1.96 × 10−5 | 0.96 | 81 | 2.94 × 10−4 | 0.47 | 3762 |
| Cu/H3PO4 | 4 | 4.64 × 10−5 | 0.87 | 53 | 8.50 × 10−4 | 0.45 | 2649 |
Figure 9Potentiodynamic polarization curves obtained in 3.5% NaCl solution after 48 h for bare copper electrode, copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM, and copper electrode treated with H3PO4 solution and modified with 1-dodecanethiol SAM.
Polarization parameters of copper electrode, copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM and H3PO4-treated copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM in 3.5% NaCl solution for 48 h.
| Sample | IE% | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | −247 | 97 | −66 | 4.75 × 10−6 | - |
| Cu/1-dodecanethiol SAM | −235 | 199 | −49 | 1.28 × 10−6 | 73.1 |
| Cu/H3PO4/1-dodecanethiol SAM | −187 | 48 | −205 | 1.32 × 10−7 | 97.2 |
Figure 10Nyquist plots of (a) bare copper electrode, (b) copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM, and (c) H3PO4-treated copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM in 3.5% NaCl solution at different times.
Electrochemical impedance parameters of bare copper electrode.
| Sample | Time | CPEf |
| CPEdl |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu | 0.5 | 3 | 1.96 × 10−5 | 0.96 | 81 | 2.92 × 10−4 | 0.47 | 3762 |
| 4 | 4 | 2.62 × 10−6 | 0.98 | 293 | 8.18 × 10−5 | 0.46 | 7292 | |
| 12 | 4 | 4.23 × 10−6 | 0.98 | 109 | 5.98 × 10−5 | 0.51 | 7533 | |
| 24 | 4 | 4.18 × 10−6 | 0.98 | 137 | 4.20 × 10−5 | 0.68 | 7832 | |
| 36 | 4 | 4.04 × 10−6 | 0.95 | 155 | 4.09 × 10−5 | 0.71 | 8654 | |
| 48 | 4 | 3.73 × 10−6 | 0.92 | 185 | 3.51 × 10−5 | 0.69 | 9625 |
Electrochemical impedance parameters of copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM.
| Sample | Time | CPEf |
| CPEdl |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu/ | 0.5 | 6 | 1.69 × 10−6 | 0.88 | 6573 | 1.93 × 10−5 | 0.47 | 50,575 |
| 4 | 5 | 2.00 × 10−6 | 0.88 | 6398 | 2.04 × 10−5 | 0.45 | 35,949 | |
| 12 | 7 | 2.46 × 10−6 | 0.98 | 4597 | 2.17 × 10−5 | 0.50 | 31,803 | |
| 24 | 6 | 3.08 × 10−6 | 0.94 | 3291 | 2.23 × 10−5 | 0.53 | 25,286 | |
| 36 | 4 | 3.96 × 10−6 | 0.89 | 1277 | 2.32 × 10−5 | 0.65 | 22,670 | |
| 48 | 4 | 5.04 × 10−6 | 0.92 | 931 | 2.52 × 10−5 | 0.64 | 21,026 |
Electrochemical impedance parameters of H3PO4-treated copper electrode with 1-dodecanethiol SAM.
| Sample | Time | CPEf |
| CPEdl |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cu/H3PO4/ | 0.5 | 4 | 1.21 × 10−6 | 0.57 | 1086 | 1.04 × 10−7 | 0.88 | 302,811 |
| 4 | 8 | 1.33 × 10−6 | 0.52 | 429 | 9.82 × 10−7 | 0.80 | 239,891 | |
| 12 | 5 | 1.41 × 10−6 | 0.52 | 347 | 1.21 × 10−6 | 0.84 | 214,319 | |
| 24 | 5 | 1.68 × 10−6 | 0.55 | 237 | 1.54 × 10−6 | 0.82 | 181,316 | |
| 36 | 5 | 1.86 × 10−6 | 0.50 | 202 | 1.79 × 10−6 | 0.81 | 172,380 | |
| 48 | 6 | 2.15 × 10−6 | 0.60 | 153 | 2.83 × 10−6 | 0.82 | 153,320 |
Figure 11Schematic of the formation of Cu3(PO4)2 nanoflowers.
Figure 12Schematic of networks on H3PO4-treated copper surface with 1-dodecanethiol SAM.