BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) in subjects on mechanical ventilation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MI-E on airway mucus clearance among mechanically ventilated ICU subjects. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial was conducted between June and November 2017 in a single, mixed ICU. Adult ICU subjects receiving mechanical ventilation for > 24 h with stable ventilatory and hemodynamic status were randomized to receive either standard respiratory physiotherapy alone (control group) or respiratory physiotherapy by using an MI-E device (intervention group). The primary outcome was the weight of aspirated airway mucus after study interventions. Secondary outcomes included variation in static lung compliance (ΔCL), airway resistance (ΔRaw), work of breathing (ΔWOB) in relation to the pre-intervention period, and hemodynamic and ventilator complications during the procedures. RESULTS: There were 90 subjects in each group. The mean ± SD weight of the aspirated airway mucus was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (2.42 ± 2.32 g vs 1.35 ± 1.56 g, P < .001). The ΔCL values in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group (1.76 ± 4.90 mL/cm H2O vs -0.57 ± 4.85 mL/cm H2O, P = .001). The ΔRaw and ΔWOB values were similar between the groups. No hemodynamic or ventilatory complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Among the general ICU subjects receivingmechanical ventilation, use of an MI-E device during respiratory physiotherapy resulted in a larger amount of airway mucus clearance than respiratory physiotherapy alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03178565.).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated the effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) in subjects on mechanical ventilation. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of MI-E on airway mucus clearance among mechanically ventilated ICU subjects. METHODS: A randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial was conducted between June and November 2017 in a single, mixed ICU. Adult ICU subjects receiving mechanical ventilation for > 24 h with stable ventilatory and hemodynamic status were randomized to receive either standard respiratory physiotherapy alone (control group) or respiratory physiotherapy by using an MI-E device (intervention group). The primary outcome was the weight of aspirated airway mucus after study interventions. Secondary outcomes included variation in static lung compliance (ΔCL), airway resistance (ΔRaw), work of breathing (ΔWOB) in relation to the pre-intervention period, and hemodynamic and ventilator complications during the procedures. RESULTS: There were 90 subjects in each group. The mean ± SD weight of the aspirated airway mucus was higher in the intervention group than in the control group (2.42 ± 2.32 g vs 1.35 ± 1.56 g, P < .001). The ΔCL values in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group (1.76 ± 4.90 mL/cm H2O vs -0.57 ± 4.85 mL/cm H2O, P = .001). The ΔRaw and ΔWOB values were similar between the groups. No hemodynamic or ventilatory complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Among the general ICU subjects receiving mechanical ventilation, use of an MI-E device during respiratory physiotherapy resulted in a larger amount of airway mucus clearance than respiratory physiotherapy alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT03178565.).
Authors: Ema Swingwood; Willemke Stilma; Lyvonne Tume; Fiona Cramp; Frederique Paulus; Marcus Schultz; Wilma Scholte Op Reimer; Louise Rose Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2020-12-08
Authors: Chloe Apps; Kelly Morris; Laura Allum; Neeraj Shah; Laura Mylott; Isobel Hinton; Danielle Spencer; Rachel Farley; Hannah Mitchell; Leyla Osman Journal: Physiother Res Int Date: 2022-06-18