Michael M Beyea1, Bourke W Tillmann2, Alla E Iansavichene3, Varinder K Randhawa4, Kristine Van Aarsen5, A Dave Nagpal6. 1. Division of Emergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Critical Care Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada. Electronic address: mbeyea@uwo.ca. 2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada. 3. Health Science Library, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Campus, London, ON, Canada. 4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. Division of Emergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada. 6. Critical Care Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted CPR (ECPR) is an evolving adjunct for resuscitation of OHCA patients. The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess survival-to-hospital discharge with good neurologic recovery after OHCA among patients treated with ECPR compared to conventional CPR (CCPR). METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE® and EMBASE® electronic databases was performed from inception until July 2016 to identify studies reporting ECPR use in adults with OHCA and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1512 citations identified, 75 studies met our inclusion criteria (63 case series and 12 cohort studies). Among case series, 0 to 71.4% of patients treated with ECPR survived to discharge with a good neurologic outcome. Subgroup analysis of the cohort studies demonstrated survival-to-hospital discharge with good neurologic recovery in the ECPR group ranging from 8.3 to 41.6% compared to 1.5 to 9.1% in the CCPR group. Five cohort studies adjusted for confounders, 3 of which demonstrated significantly increased adjusted odds ratios of survival among the ECPR-treated patients. Due to significant heterogeneity (I2 = 63%, p = 0.03), pooling of outcomes and a meta-analysis were not conducted. CONCLUSION: Although a trend towards improved survival with good neurologic outcome was reported in controlled, low-risk of bias cohort studies, a preponderance of low quality evidence may ascribe an optimistic effect size of ECPR on survival among OHCA patients. Our confidence in a clinically relevant difference in outcomes compared to current standards of care for OHCA remains weak. In this state of equipoise, high quality RCT data is urgently needed.
INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-assisted CPR (ECPR) is an evolving adjunct for resuscitation of OHCA patients. The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess survival-to-hospital discharge with good neurologic recovery after OHCA among patients treated with ECPR compared to conventional CPR (CCPR). METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE® and EMBASE® electronic databases was performed from inception until July 2016 to identify studies reporting ECPR use in adults with OHCA and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1512 citations identified, 75 studies met our inclusion criteria (63 case series and 12 cohort studies). Among case series, 0 to 71.4% of patients treated with ECPR survived to discharge with a good neurologic outcome. Subgroup analysis of the cohort studies demonstrated survival-to-hospital discharge with good neurologic recovery in the ECPR group ranging from 8.3 to 41.6% compared to 1.5 to 9.1% in the CCPR group. Five cohort studies adjusted for confounders, 3 of which demonstrated significantly increased adjusted odds ratios of survival among the ECPR-treated patients. Due to significant heterogeneity (I2 = 63%, p = 0.03), pooling of outcomes and a meta-analysis were not conducted. CONCLUSION: Although a trend towards improved survival with good neurologic outcome was reported in controlled, low-risk of bias cohort studies, a preponderance of low quality evidence may ascribe an optimistic effect size of ECPR on survival among OHCA patients. Our confidence in a clinically relevant difference in outcomes compared to current standards of care for OHCA remains weak. In this state of equipoise, high quality RCT data is urgently needed.
Authors: Julia M Carlson; Eric Etchill; Glenn Whitman; Bo Soo Kim; Chun Woo Choi; Joseph E Tonna; Romergryko Geocadin; Sung-Min Cho Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2022-08-04 Impact factor: 6.251