BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common form of arthritis with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 45%. The use of orthotic devices is a generally accepted conservative therapy in KOA. A new conservative treatment is an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO); however, studies on the biomechanical effects are limited. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of different orthotic devices (AFO, knee brace and wedged shoes) on (un)loading parameters in subjects with KOA. METHODS: Fifty-two medial KOA patients (mean age 59 (standard deviation (SD) 10) years and mean body mass index 27.5 (SD 4.9) kg/m2) were recruited. Three-dimensional gait analysis was undertaken with different interventions in a randomized order: control (own shoes), new AFO, conventional unloader brace and laterally wedged shoes (six degrees). RESULTS: Significant decreases of 27% and nine percent in first peak knee adduction moment (KAM) were observed for the AFO and wedged shoes, respectively, in comparison with the control. Significant decreases of 21%, seven percent and 18% in the KAM impulse were observed for the AFO, brace and wedged shoes, respectively, compared to the control. The knee flexion moment (KFM) increased compared to the control for all conditions, but only significantly while using the AFO, showing an increase of 26% as compared to the control. CONCLUSIONS: The AFO and wedged shoes were more effective in unloading the medial compartment of the knee compared to the unloader brace. However, the effect of an increased KFM on KOA remains unclear and requires further investigation.
BACKGROUND:Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is the most common form of arthritis with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 45%. The use of orthotic devices is a generally accepted conservative therapy in KOA. A new conservative treatment is an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO); however, studies on the biomechanical effects are limited. The aim of this study was to examine the acute effects of different orthotic devices (AFO, knee brace and wedged shoes) on (un)loading parameters in subjects with KOA. METHODS: Fifty-two medial KOA patients (mean age 59 (standard deviation (SD) 10) years and mean body mass index 27.5 (SD 4.9) kg/m2) were recruited. Three-dimensional gait analysis was undertaken with different interventions in a randomized order: control (own shoes), new AFO, conventional unloader brace and laterally wedged shoes (six degrees). RESULTS: Significant decreases of 27% and nine percent in first peak knee adduction moment (KAM) were observed for the AFO and wedged shoes, respectively, in comparison with the control. Significant decreases of 21%, seven percent and 18% in the KAM impulse were observed for the AFO, brace and wedged shoes, respectively, compared to the control. The knee flexion moment (KFM) increased compared to the control for all conditions, but only significantly while using the AFO, showing an increase of 26% as compared to the control. CONCLUSIONS: The AFO and wedged shoes were more effective in unloading the medial compartment of the knee compared to the unloader brace. However, the effect of an increased KFM on KOA remains unclear and requires further investigation.
Authors: Lianzhi Chen; Jessica Jun Yi Zheng; Guangyi Li; Jun Yuan; Jay R Ebert; Hengyuan Li; John Papadimitriou; Qingwen Wang; David Wood; Christopher W Jones; Minghao Zheng Journal: J Orthop Translat Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Martin Schwarze; Leonie P Bartsch; Julia Block; Merkur Alimusaj; Ayham Jaber; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Sebastian I Wolf Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Leonie P Bartsch; Martin Schwarze; Julia Block; Merkur Alimusaj; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Ayham Jaber; Sebastian I Wolf Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 3.959