Literature DB >> 30016816

Health Information Systems - from Present to Future?

Reinhold Haux.   

Abstract

This article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on the German Medical Informatics Initiative. Funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research with about 150 million Euro in its currently starting development and networking phase this initiative has already a significant impact on the development of health information systems in Germany. In this Focus Theme two editorials introduce this initiative, one from the viewpoint of its funding institution and one from the initiative's accompanying institutions. Then the initiative's four consortia DIFUTURE (Data Integration for Future Medicine), HiGHmed (Heidelberg-Göttingen-Hannover Medical Informatics), MIRACUM (Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine), and SMITH (Smart Medical Information Technology for Healthcare) present their concepts and plans. For better readability their manuscripts all contain three major sections on governance and policies, on architectural framework and methodology, and on use cases. As the German Medical Informatics Initiative is a large national experiment, we are convinced that communicating on this initiative already at this early stage to an international audience is of importance. Schattauer GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30016816      PMCID: PMC6178198          DOI: 10.3414/ME18-03-0004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


1. On Digitization and Health Information Systems

Digitization has meanwhile become a priority for governments and societies (e.g. [ 1 , 2 ] for Germany). In the context of the United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals it is mentioned that the “spread of information and communications technology and global interconnectedness has great potential to accelerate human progress, to bridge the digital divide and to develop knowledge societies, as does scientific and technological innovation across areas as diverse as medicine and energy” [ 3 ]. Health care and biomedical research in this new information age is affected in many ways (e.g. [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ]). According to the World Health Organization, information and communication technologies for health are “recognised as one of the most rapidly growing areas in health today” [ 8 ]. Health information systems in this context play an important role. They have developed significantly during the last decades. As examples, for the 1980ies [ 9 ], the seminal paper of Peter Reichertz on this topic is mentioned here, also [ 10 ] and [ 11 ] for the first decade of the 21 st century ([ 11 ] directly referring to [ 9 ]), as well as [ 12 ] and [ 13 ] for current reflections. As outlined in [ 14 ], the trend from institution-centered (e.g. hospital-centered) information processing for health care to information processing, supporting patient-centered care beyond one health care institution has already been mentioned in [ 11 ], section 3.2 (see also figure 6 on p. 277, line 2). It was there as well mentioned that health information systems should support both patient care and biomedical research ([ 11 ], section 3.4, see also figure 6 on p. 277, line 4). In spite of this progress during the last decades, there is still a significant need for improving health information systems’ architectures and functionalities, in particular for the benefit of patients as well as for the progress of biomedical/health sciences and of computer/information sciences.

2. On the Contents of this Focus Theme on the German Medical Informatics Initiative

In this focus theme of Methods of Information in Medicine, reports are presented on a national experiment: The German Medical Informatics Initiative. Funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research with about 150 million Euro in its currently starting “development and networking phase” (details in [ 15 , 16 ]), it has already now, in a still rather initial state, a significant impact on the development of health information systems in Germany. It can be expected that the outcomes of this large national research project will significantly influence biomedical and health informatics research worldwide. Two editorials provide introductions to the German Medical informatics Initiative. In [ 15 ] Stefanie Gehring and René Eulenfeld introduce the German Medical informatics Initiative on behalf of its funding institution, the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. In [ 16 ] Sebastian Semler, Frank Wissing, and Ralf Heyder take the viewpoint of accompanying institutions of the German Medical informatics Initiative. These editorials are to some extent redundant in content, while, however, reflecting the initiative from different viewpoints. Then the four consortia, having been positively evaluated after the initiative’s “conceptual phase” (details in [ 15 , 16 ]) will introduce their concepts. The consortia are (in alphabetic order): DIFUTURE – Data Integration for Future Medicine [ 17 ], HiGHmed – Heidelberg-Göttingen-Hannover Medical Informatics [ 18 ], MIRACUM – Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine [ 19 ], and SMITH – Smart Medical Information Technology for Healthcare [ 20 ]. For better readability all consortia followed an identical structure with three major sections on governance and policies, on architectural framework and methodology, and on use cases.

3. From Present to Future?

When planning this Focus Theme with consortia’s leading medical informatics colleagues and with the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, we were aware of the fact that reporting about the German Medical Informatics Initiative at this early stage cannot contain results and has to focus on presenting concepts and plans. As it is a large national experiment on an important topic, we are convinced that communicating on these concepts and plans to an international audience is of importance. Choosing for publication Methods Open, the Gold Open Access part of Methods of Information in Medicine, makes the manuscript of this Focus Theme immediately broadly available in a fair way through the journal’s tandem model ([ 21 ], p. 484). Will the German Medical Informatics Initiative push health information systems from the current present state to a new future state? Will this progress be for the benefit of patients as well as for the progress of biomedical/health sciences and of computer/information sciences? Will progress be mainly limited to Germany or will it have an international impact? Answers to all these questions will hopefully be given in the future, after the German Medical Informatics Initiative’s development and networking phase or even later.
  16 in total

1.  Assessing the prognoses on Health care in the information society 2013--thirteen years after.

Authors:  Petra Knaup; Elske Ammenwerth; Carl Dujat; Andrew Grant; Arie Hasman; Andreas Hein; Achim Hochlehnert; Casimir Kulikowski; John Mantas; Victor Maojo; Michael Marschollek; Lincoln Moura; Maik Plischke; Rainer Röhrig; Jürgen Stausberg; Katsuhiko Takabayashi; Frank Uckert; Alfred Winter; Klaus-Hendrik Wolf; Reinhold Haux
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Exploring Possibilities for Transforming Established Subscription-based Scientific Journals into Open Access Journals. Present Situation, Transformation Criteria, and Exemplary Implementation within Trans-O-MIM.

Authors:  Reinhold Haux; Stefanie Kuballa; Mareike Schulze; Claudia Böhm; Olaf Gefeller; Jan Haaf; Peter Henning; Corinna Mielke; Florian Niggemann; Andrea Schürg; Dieter Bergemann
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Digital Medicine and Biomedical Informatics: What's in a Name?

Authors:  Edward H Shortliffe
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  The New Role of Biomedical Informatics in the Age of Digital Medicine.

Authors:  Fernando J Martin-Sanchez; Guillermo H Lopez-Campos
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Discussion of "The New Role of Biomedical Informatics in the Age of Digital Medicine".

Authors:  Najeeb Al-Shorbaji; Riccardo Bellazzi; Fernan Gonzalez Bernaldo de Quiros; Sabine Koch; Casimir A Kulikowski; Nigel H Lovell; Victor Maojo; Hyeoun-Ae Park; Ferran Sanz; Indra N Sarkar; Hiroshi Tanaka
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 6.  Health information systems - past, present, future.

Authors:  Reinhold Haux
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  MIRACUM: Medical Informatics in Research and Care in University Medicine.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Till Acker; Johannes Bernarding; Harald Binder; Martin Boeker; Melanie Boerries; Philipp Daumke; Thomas Ganslandt; Jürgen Hesser; Gunther Höning; Michael Neumaier; Kurt Marquardt; Harald Renz; Hermann-Josef Rothkötter; Carmen Schade-Brittinger; Paul Schmücker; Jürgen Schüttler; Martin Sedlmayr; Hubert Serve; Keywan Sohrabi; Holger Storf
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.176

8.  HiGHmed - An Open Platform Approach to Enhance Care and Research across Institutional Boundaries.

Authors:  Birger Haarbrandt; Björn Schreiweis; Sabine Rey; Ulrich Sax; Simone Scheithauer; Otto Rienhoff; Petra Knaup-Gregori; Udo Bavendiek; Christoph Dieterich; Benedikt Brors; Inga Kraus; Caroline Marieken Thoms; Dirk Jäger; Volker Ellenrieder; Björn Bergh; Ramin Yahyapour; Roland Eils; HiGHmed Consortium; Michael Marschollek
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.176

9.  Smart Medical Information Technology for Healthcare (SMITH).

Authors:  Alfred Winter; Sebastian Stäubert; Danny Ammon; Stephan Aiche; Oya Beyan; Verena Bischoff; Philipp Daumke; Stefan Decker; Gert Funkat; Jan E Gewehr; Armin de Greiff; Silke Haferkamp; Udo Hahn; Andreas Henkel; Toralf Kirsten; Thomas Klöss; Jörg Lippert; Matthias Löbe; Volker Lowitsch; Oliver Maassen; Jens Maschmann; Sven Meister; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Matthias Nüchter; Mathias W Pletz; Erhard Rahm; Morris Riedel; Kutaiba Saleh; Andreas Schuppert; Stefan Smers; André Stollenwerk; Stefan Uhlig; Thomas Wendt; Sven Zenker; Wolfgang Fleig; Gernot Marx; André Scherag; Markus Löffler
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.176

10.  Data Integration for Future Medicine (DIFUTURE).

Authors:  Fabian Prasser; Oliver Kohlbacher; Ulrich Mansmann; Bernhard Bauer; Klaus A Kuhn
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mapping the Entire Record-An Alternative Approach to Data Access from Medical Logic Modules.

Authors:  Stefan Kraus; Dennis Toddenroth; Martin Staudigel; Wolfgang Rödle; Philipp Unberath; Lena Griebel; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Sebastian Mate
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.342

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.