Samuel P Scott1, Laura E Murray-Kolb1, Michael J Wenger2, Shobha A Udipi3, Padmini S Ghugre3, Erick Boy4, Jere D Haas5. 1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. 2. Department of Psychology and Cellular and Behavioral Neurobiology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK. 3. Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University Women's University, Mumbai, India. 4. Harvest Plus, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. 5. Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iron deficiency remains the most prevalent micronutrient deficiency globally, but few studies have examined how iron status relates to cognition in adolescents. Iron biofortification of staple food crops is being scaled up, yet it is unknown whether consuming biofortified crops can benefit cognition. Objective: Our objective was to determine the efficacy of iron-biofortified pearl millet in improving attention and memory in Indian school-going adolescents. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, intervention study was conducted in 140 Indian boys and girls, aged 12-16 y, who were assigned to consume iron-biofortified [Fe = 86 parts per million (ppm)] or conventional (Fe = 21-52 ppm) pearl millet. Hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin receptor (TfR) were measured and body iron (BI) was calculated at baseline and after 4 and 6 mo. Five measures of cognitive function were obtained at baseline and 6 mo: simple reaction time (SRT), Go/No-Go (GNG) task, Attentional Network Task (ANT), Composite Face Effect (CFE) task, and Cued Recognition Task (CRT). Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results:Daily iron intake from pearl millet was higher in those consuming biofortified compared with conventional pearl millet (19.6 compared with 4.8 mg/d). Effects on ferritin, TfR, and BI at 4 mo, and on TfR at 6 mo (all P < 0.05), indicated efficacy of biofortified pearl millet over conventional pearl millet in improving iron status. Compared with conventional pearl millet, the consumption of biofortified pearl millet resulted in greater improvement in attention (SRT, GNG, and ANT) and memory (CFE and CRT). Reaction time decreased twice as much from 0 to 6 mo in those consuming biofortified compared with conventional pearl millet on attention tasks (SRT: -123 compared with -63 ms; GNG: -67 compared with -30 ms; ANT double cue: -74 compared with -32 ms; all P < 0.01). Conclusion:Consuming iron-biofortified pearl millet improves iron status and some measures of cognitive performance in Indian adolescents. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02152150.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Iron deficiency remains the most prevalent micronutrient deficiency globally, but few studies have examined how iron status relates to cognition in adolescents. Iron biofortification of staple food crops is being scaled up, yet it is unknown whether consuming biofortified crops can benefit cognition. Objective: Our objective was to determine the efficacy of iron-biofortified pearl millet in improving attention and memory in Indian school-going adolescents. Methods: A double-blind, randomized, intervention study was conducted in 140 Indian boys and girls, aged 12-16 y, who were assigned to consume iron-biofortified [Fe = 86 parts per million (ppm)] or conventional (Fe = 21-52 ppm) pearl millet. Hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin receptor (TfR) were measured and body iron (BI) was calculated at baseline and after 4 and 6 mo. Five measures of cognitive function were obtained at baseline and 6 mo: simple reaction time (SRT), Go/No-Go (GNG) task, Attentional Network Task (ANT), Composite Face Effect (CFE) task, and Cued Recognition Task (CRT). Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: Daily iron intake from pearl millet was higher in those consuming biofortified compared with conventional pearl millet (19.6 compared with 4.8 mg/d). Effects on ferritin, TfR, and BI at 4 mo, and on TfR at 6 mo (all P < 0.05), indicated efficacy of biofortified pearl millet over conventional pearl millet in improving iron status. Compared with conventional pearl millet, the consumption of biofortified pearl millet resulted in greater improvement in attention (SRT, GNG, and ANT) and memory (CFE and CRT). Reaction time decreased twice as much from 0 to 6 mo in those consuming biofortified compared with conventional pearl millet on attention tasks (SRT: -123 compared with -63 ms; GNG: -67 compared with -30 ms; ANT double cue: -74 compared with -32 ms; all P < 0.01). Conclusion: Consuming iron-biofortified pearl millet improves iron status and some measures of cognitive performance in Indian adolescents. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02152150.
Authors: Michael J Wenger; Laura E Murray Kolb; Samuel P Scott; Erick Boy; Jere D Haas Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Jana Kholová; Milan Oldřich Urban; James Cock; Jairo Arcos; Elizabeth Arnaud; Destan Aytekin; Vania Azevedo; Andrew P Barnes; Salvatore Ceccarelli; Paul Chavarriaga; Joshua N Cobb; David Connor; Mark Cooper; Peter Craufurd; Daniel Debouck; Robert Fungo; Stefania Grando; Graeme L Hammer; Carlos E Jara; Charlie Messina; Gloria Mosquera; Eileen Nchanji; Eng Hwa Ng; Steven Prager; Sindhujan Sankaran; Michael Selvaraj; François Tardieu; Philip Thornton; Sandra P Valdes-Gutierrez; Jacob van Etten; Peter Wenzl; Yunbi Xu Journal: J Exp Bot Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 6.992
Authors: Jennifer K Foley; Kristina D Michaux; Bho Mudyahoto; Laira Kyazike; Binu Cherian; Olatundun Kalejaiye; Okonkwo Ifeoma; Paul Ilona; Chelsea Reinberg; Donald Mavindidze; Erick Boy Journal: Food Nutr Bull Date: 2021-02-17 Impact factor: 2.069
Authors: Jesse T Beasley; Alexander A T Johnson; Nikolai Kolba; Julien P Bonneau; Raymond P Glahn; Lital Ozeri; Omry Koren; Elad Tako Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-02-10 Impact factor: 4.379