Emily R Locke1, Rachel M Thomas1, Deborah M Woo2, Ethan H K Nguyen2, Bryson K Tamanaha2, Valerie G Press3, Gayle E Reiber1, Peter J Kaboli4,5, Vincent S Fan1,6. 1. 1 Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D), Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. 2. 2 Pharmacy and Nutritional Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington. 3. 3 Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 4. 4 The Comprehensive Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa. 5. 5 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa. 6. 6 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proper inhaler technique is important for effective drug delivery and symptom control in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, yet not all patients receive inhaler instructions. INTRODUCTION: Using a retrospective chart review of participants in a video telehealth inhaler training program, the study compared inhaler technique within and between monthly telehealth visits and reports associated with patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-four (N = 74) rural patients prescribed ≥1 inhaler participated in three to four pharmacist telehealth inhaler training sessions using teach-to-goal (TTG) methodology. Within and between visit inhaler technique scores are compared, with descriptive statistics of pre- and postprogram survey results including program satisfaction and computer technical issues. Healthcare utilization is compared between pre- and post-training periods. RESULTS: Sixty-nine (93%) patients completed all three to four video telehealth inhaler training sessions. During the initial visit, patients demonstrated improvement in inhaler technique for metered dose inhalers (albuterol, budesonide/formoterol), dry powder inhalers (formoterol, mometasone, tiotropium), and soft mist inhalers (ipratropium/albuterol) (p < 0.01 for all). Improved inhaler technique was sustained at 2 months (p < 0.01). Ninety-four percent of participants were satisfied with the program. Although technical issues were common, occurring among 63% of attempted visits, most of these visits (87%) could be completed. There was no significant difference in emergency department visits and hospitalizations pre- and post-training. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated high patient acceptance of video telehealth training and objective improvement in inhaler technique. CONCLUSIONS: Video telehealth inhaler training using the TTG methodology is a promising program that improved inhaler technique and access to inhaler teaching for rural patients with COPD or asthma.
BACKGROUND: Proper inhaler technique is important for effective drug delivery and symptom control in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, yet not all patients receive inhaler instructions. INTRODUCTION: Using a retrospective chart review of participants in a video telehealth inhaler training program, the study compared inhaler technique within and between monthly telehealth visits and reports associated with patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-four (N = 74) rural patients prescribed ≥1 inhaler participated in three to four pharmacist telehealth inhaler training sessions using teach-to-goal (TTG) methodology. Within and between visit inhaler technique scores are compared, with descriptive statistics of pre- and postprogram survey results including program satisfaction and computer technical issues. Healthcare utilization is compared between pre- and post-training periods. RESULTS: Sixty-nine (93%) patients completed all three to four video telehealth inhaler training sessions. During the initial visit, patients demonstrated improvement in inhaler technique for metered dose inhalers (albuterol, budesonide/formoterol), dry powder inhalers (formoterol, mometasone, tiotropium), and soft mist inhalers (ipratropium/albuterol) (p < 0.01 for all). Improved inhaler technique was sustained at 2 months (p < 0.01). Ninety-four percent of participants were satisfied with the program. Although technical issues were common, occurring among 63% of attempted visits, most of these visits (87%) could be completed. There was no significant difference in emergency department visits and hospitalizations pre- and post-training. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrated high patient acceptance of video telehealth training and objective improvement in inhaler technique. CONCLUSIONS: Video telehealth inhaler training using the TTG methodology is a promising program that improved inhaler technique and access to inhaler teaching for rural patients with COPD or asthma.
Authors: William B Weeks; Lewis E Kazis; Yujing Shen; Zhongxiao Cong; Xinhua S Ren; Donald Miller; Austin Lee; Jonathan B Perlin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrea S Melani; Marco Bonavia; Vincenzo Cilenti; Cristina Cinti; Marco Lodi; Paola Martucci; Maria Serra; Nicola Scichilone; Piersante Sestini; Maria Aliani; Margherita Neri Journal: Respir Med Date: 2011-03-02 Impact factor: 3.415
Authors: Rachel M Thomas; Emily R Locke; Deborah M Woo; Ethan H K Nguyen; Valerie G Press; Troy A Layouni; Emily H Trittschuh; Gayle E Reiber; Vincent S Fan Journal: Respir Care Date: 2017-07-18 Impact factor: 2.258
Authors: J Vestbo; J A Anderson; P M A Calverley; B Celli; G T Ferguson; C Jenkins; K Knobil; L R Willits; J C Yates; P W Jones Journal: Thorax Date: 2009-08-23 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Valerie G Press; Vineet M Arora; Kristin C Trela; Richa Adhikari; Frank J Zadravecz; Chuanhong Liao; Edward Naureckas; Steven R White; David O Meltzer; Jerry A Krishnan Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-06