Wenbiao Zheng1, Junhui Guan1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Municipal Hospital, Taizhou, Zhejiang 318000, P.R. China.
Abstract
The present study investigated the function of oncostatin M (OSM), which may be associated with monocyte chemotactic protein‑1 (MCP‑1), on mouse MC3T3‑E1 osteoblast development and bone remodeling. Levels of MCP‑1, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP1α) and regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) were measured by ELISA. Cell viability, migration and invasion abilities were detected by MTT, wound healing and Transwell assays, respectively. Western blotting was performed to detect levels of phosphorylated protein kinase B (Akt). Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting were performed to detect the levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)‑1, ‑2 and ‑3. The results demonstrated that OSM treatment significantly increased MCP‑1 levels in a dose‑dependent manner. Interleukin (IL)‑1, also significantly increased MCP‑1 levels; however, treatment with other cytokines, including IL‑6, IL‑11 and leukemia inhibitory factor did not affect MCP‑1 levels to the same extent. In addition, OSM did not affect levels of the chemokines MIP1α and RANTES; indeed, only IL‑1 significantly increased levels of MIP1α and RANTES. OSM treatment promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion in a dose‑dependent manner, which were inhibited by MCP‑1 silencing. The expression of phosphorylated‑Akt, MMP‑1, ‑2 and ‑3 were increased by OSM treatment; however, these increases were reversed following MCP‑1 silencing. Collectively these data suggest that OSM promotes the differentiation of mouse MC3T3‑E1 osteoblasts via regulation of MCP‑1 expression. These results may therefore provide novel insights into bone repair and remodeling.
The present study investigated the function of oncostatin M (OSM), which may be associated with monocyte chemotactic protein‑1 (MCP‑1), on mouse MC3T3‑E1 osteoblast development and bone remodeling. Levels of MCP‑1, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP1α) and regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) were measured by ELISA. Cell viability, migration and invasion abilities were detected by MTT, wound healing and Transwell assays, respectively. Western blotting was performed to detect levels of phosphorylated protein kinase B (Akt). Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blotting were performed to detect the levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)‑1, ‑2 and ‑3. The results demonstrated that OSM treatment significantly increased MCP‑1 levels in a dose‑dependent manner. Interleukin (IL)‑1, also significantly increased MCP‑1 levels; however, treatment with other cytokines, including IL‑6, IL‑11 and leukemia inhibitory factor did not affect MCP‑1 levels to the same extent. In addition, OSM did not affect levels of the chemokines MIP1α and RANTES; indeed, only IL‑1 significantly increased levels of MIP1α and RANTES. OSM treatment promoted the proliferation, migration and invasion in a dose‑dependent manner, which were inhibited by MCP‑1 silencing. The expression of phosphorylated‑Akt, MMP‑1, ‑2 and ‑3 were increased by OSM treatment; however, these increases were reversed following MCP‑1 silencing. Collectively these data suggest that OSM promotes the differentiation of mouse MC3T3‑E1 osteoblasts via regulation of MCP‑1 expression. These results may therefore provide novel insights into bone repair and remodeling.
Skeletal repair and remodeling help to maintain bone integrity and this process occurs over the life course. It clears away aged bone tissues, in addition to repairing bone injuries and fractures (1). The remodeling process involves two mechanisms: Bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts (2). These mechanisms are tightly coordinated to ensure that skeletal integrity is maintained; the dysregulation of bone remodeling may lead to the onset of bone diseases, including osteoarthritis and osteoporosis (3).Cytokines and chemokines are usually secreted by immune cells, which serve critical roles in host defense systems and help to ensure that tissues remain in a healthy state (4). Studies have already determined the roles that chemokines in the immune system (5,6). However, the effect on bone remodeling requires further research. Certain chemokines, including TNFα, IL-6 and RANKL, are able to regulate osteoblasts and osteoclasts (7–10). Oncostatin M (OSM) is a cytokine which is part of the interleukin (IL)-6 family and originates from monocytes, macrophages or T-cells that are involved in chronic inflammation (11). OSM is commonly associated with osteoblast proliferation and collagen synthesis and is able to stimulate bone formation and resorption (12,13). It also serves a number of functions in skeletal tissue alteration, bone metabolism and inflammatory diseases (14,15). Furthermore, OSM assists with inducing the expression of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) in human proximal tubular cells, human aortic adventitial fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells (16,17).MCP-1 [also known as C-C motif chemokine (CCL)2], macrophage inflammatory protein 1α (MIP1α, also known as CCL3) and regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES, also known as CCL5) are members of the CC subfamily of chemokines that contain conserved cysteine residues (18,19). MCP-1induces the recruitment and activation of leukocytes to alleviate acute inflammation (20). During bone remodeling, MCP-1 is secreted by osteoblasts and promotes osteoclast differentiation to stimulate matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-induced cell fusion (21).The different types of MMPs include MMP-1 (fibroblast collagenase), MMP-2 (gelatinase A) and MMP-3 (stromelysin-1) (22). MMPs are primarily distributed in the bone matrix and usually regulate the proteolysis of extracellular matrix structural proteins, as well as induce cell metastasis (23). MMPs also participate in bone repair and remodeling (24). MMPs are secreted by chondrocytes and synovial lining cells and elevated MMPs have been detected in the synovial joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (25,26). The cytokine IL-1is able to promote MMP-1 and MMP-3 expression in synovial tissues (27) and MMP-2 mediates sarcomere degeneration during OSM-induced cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and regeneration (28). Furthermore, OSM is able to promote trophoblast invasion activity by stimulating the activity of MMP-2 and MMP-9 (29).To the best of the authors' knowledge, the mechanism by which OSM stimulates MCP-1 in osteoblasts, including during its regulation of MMPs, remains to be elucidated. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the regulatory function of OSM in parallel with MCP-1 in the skeletal repair and remodeling process, in order to provide novel insights into bone health.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
Mouse MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Osteoblasts were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) in 5% CO2 at 37°C. For subsequent experiments, cells in the logarithmic growth phase were used.
ELISA
Cells were cultured in 12-well plates and stimulated with varying concentrations of OSM (0, 1, 5, 10, 30 and 50 ng/ml), IL-1 (10 ng/ml), IL-6 (30 ng/ml), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF; 20 ng/ml) or IL-11 (30 ng/ml) for 24 h. All cytokines were purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Cells were centrifuged at 6,000 × g and 4°C for 10 min, and supernatants were collected and stored at −20°C prior to analysis.MCP-1, MIP1α and RANTES levels were respectively determined using the MouseCCL2/JE/MCP-1 Quantikine ELISA kit (MJE00; R&D Systems, Inc.), MouseCCL3/MIP1α Quantikine ELISA kit (MMA00; R&D Systems, Inc.), and Mouse/RatCCL5/RANTES Quantikine ELISA kit (MMR00; R&D Systems, Inc.), following the manufacturer's protocol. Cell supernatants (50 µl) or specific standard substances (MCP-1, MIP1α and RANTES) from the kits were added to the wells of a 96-well plate and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Biotinylated conjugates from the kits were added to the wells and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Following rinsing, the substrate avidin peroxidase complex was added and incubated for another 30 min. Reactions were attenuated using stop solution and optical density values were measured at a wavelength of 450 nm using a microplate reader. The concentration of cytokines in samples was calculated via interpolation of a standard curve.
MTT assay
Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. Cells were seeded into a 96-well plate at 5×103 cells/well and stimulated using different concentrations of OSM (10, 30 and 50 ng/ml) for 24 h. Subsequently, 10 µl MTT reagent was added to each well, the formazan crystals dissolved by dimethyl sulfoxide, and the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm, following the manufacturer's protocol (Cell Growth Detection kit MTT-Based; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany).
Wound healing assay
Cells were seeded in 12-well plates at 1×105 cells/well and stimulated by different concentrations of OSM (10, 30 and 50 ng/ml). The confluent monolayer of cells was scratched gently using a pipette yellow tip to form a cell-free area in wells. Cells were observed using a light microscope (magnification, ×200) 24 h after stimulation.
Cell invasion assay
Cell invasion was detected using 24-well Transwell chambers containing 8-µm pore polycarbonate filters (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA) and chambers pre-coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Briefly, cells treated with different concentrations of OSM (10, 30 and 50 ng/ml) for 24 h were collected and transferred to the upper chambers (5×104 cells/well) containing DMEM (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and Matrigel. The bottom chambers contained DMEM culture medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and 10% FBS. Following incubation for 24 h, invaded cells on the lower surface that passed through the filter were fixed with ice cold methanol for 30 min and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min at 37°C. Invaded cells were counted in four randomly selected high-power fields using a light microscope (magnification, ×200) and the relative number of cells was calculated. Experiments were repeated 3 times and the average of the 3 independent experiments was recorded.
Small interfering (si)RNA transfection
MCP-1 siRNA transfection was performed to determine whether the effect of OSM on cell proliferation and invasion is dependent on MCP-1 expression. siRNA-MCP-1 was designed and synthesized by Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) as 5′-AACTTCACCAATAGGAAGATC-3′. A nonspecific sequence was used as NC control: 5′-CACATTTCAAACGTAGTAGAA-3′. For siRNA transfection, cells were seeded into 12-well plates at a concentration of 5×104 cells/well and 50% confluent cells were transfected with 5 nmol/l MCP-1 siRNA (siMCP-1 group) or nonspecific siRNA (mock group), with HiPerFect Transfection Reagent (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) for 24 h, according to the manufacturer's protocol. Then cells were stimulated with OSM (30 ng/ml) for 24 h, in the OSM+siMCP-1 group or OSM+mock group respectively. Cells that did not receive any treatment, including transfection and OSM stimulation, were used as a control (Control group). Only cells stimulated with 30 ng/ml OSM were defined as OSM group. Subsequently, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and western blotting were conducted to determine the interference efficiency by measuring MCP-1 levels in the OSM+siMCP-1, OSM+mock, OSM and control groups.
RT-qPCR
Levels of mRNA were measured using RT-qPCR. Total RNA was extracted from cells using an RNeasy kit (Qiagen GmbH) and cDNA was synthesized with 1 µg total RNA using an EN-QuantiTect Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen GmbH), according to the manufacturer's protocol. qPCR was performed using Fast SYBR Green Master mix (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) on a ABI 7300 Thermocycler (Applied Biosystems; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The reactions were conducted for 15 sec at 95°C for pre-heating, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec and annealing/extension at 60°C for 25 sec, and a final step of 72°C for 10 min. The primer sequences used are presented in Table I. GAPDH was used as a reference gene. The quantification was identified by 2−ΔΔCq method (30).
Table I.
Primers used in the reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Cells were lysed by protein lysis reagent P0013 (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China), and cell lysis was centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatants were collected and the protein concentrations were determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). Subsequently, proteins (20 µg/lane) were electrophoresed using 15% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Following blocking with 5% nonfat dry milk in PBS for 1 h at 37°C, membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with specific primary antibodies. GAPDH was used as a loading control. The primary antibodies were: Rabbit anti-MCP-1 (ab25124; 1:2,000), anti-p-AKT (ab38449; 1:1,000), anti-Akt (ab8805; 1:500), anti-MMP-1 (ab137332, 1:2,000), anti-MMP-2 (ab37150; 1:1,000), anti-MMP-3 (ab53015; 1:1,000) and anti-GAPDH (ab9485; 1:2,500). Membranes were then probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies: Goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (HRP; ab6721; 1:5,000) at 37°C for 1 h. The PVDF membrane was exposed to an X-ray film and immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagents (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). Band densities were quantified using Bio-Rad ChemiDoc™ XRS+System with Image Lab™ software version 4.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). All antibodies were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).
Statistical analysis
All values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of 5 independent experiments. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 13.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and significance was determined by performing one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
The effect of the cytokines OSM, IL-1, IL-6, LIF and IL-11 on the chemokines MCP-1, MIP1α and RANTES in osteoblasts
ELISA was performed to assess the responses of cells to OSM, IL-1, IL-6, LIF and IL-11. Cells were stimulated with OSM (0, 1, 5, 10, 30 and 50 ng/ml), IL-1 (10 ng/ml), IL-6 (30 ng/ml), LIF (20 ng/ml) and IL-11 (30 ng/ml). Supernatants were collected and the levels of MCP-1, MIP1α and RANTES were analyzed using ELISA. The results revealed that IL-1 significantly increased levels of the cytokines MCP-1, MIP1α and RANTES compared with controls (all P<0.01; Fig. 1A-C). Furthermore, IL-6, LIF and IL-11 significantly increased levels of MCP-1, and did not affect expression levels of MIP1α and RANTES, compared with the control (Fig. 1B and C). In addition, the concentrations of MCP-1 significantly increased in a dose-dependent manner when cells were stimulated with OSM (P<0.01) and the effect of OSM (50 ng/ml) was almost equal to the effect of IL-1 (Fig. 1A). However, OSM had no effect on the expression levels of MIP1α and RANTES (Fig. 1B and C).
Figure 1.
OSM stimulated chemokine expression in osteoblasts. Cells were stimulated with cytokines, including OSM (0, 1, 5, 10, 30 and 50 ng/ml), IL-1 (10 ng/ml), IL-6 (30 ng/ml), LIF (20 ng/ml) and IL-11 (30 ng/ml). Supernatants were collected and analyzed using ELISA to determine levels of (A) MCP-1, (B) MIP1α and (C) RANTES. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. n=5. *P<0.01 and **P<0.01 vs. control. OSM, oncostatin M; IL, interleukin; LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; MIP1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; RANTES, regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted.
OSM stimulates the progression of osteoblasts
Cells were stimulated with different concentrations of OSM (10, 30 and 50 ng/ml) for 24 h. An MTT assay was performed to detect cell viability, a wound healing assay was conducted to measure cell migration and a Transwell assay was employed to assess cell invasion. The results revealed that there were dose-dependent increases in cell viability, wound healing and cell invasion in the OSM groups compared with the control group (all P<0.01; Fig. 2). Following treatment with 10, 30 and 50 ng/ml OSM, cell viability increased 44, 75 and 91%, respectively (Fig. 2A). The wound healing area increased 94, 123 and 158% respectively, following treatment with 10, 30 and 50 ng/ml OSM (Fig. 2B). Cell invasion ability increased 480, 590 and 660% of the control, respectively (P<0.01; Fig. 2C).
Figure 2.
OSM induced cell progression in osteoblasts. (A) An MTT assay was performed to detect cell viability and cells were counted 24 h following stimulation with different concentrations of OSM (10, 30 and 50 ng/ml). (B) Cell migration abilities were measured using a wound healing assay 24 h after scratch. (C) Cell invasion abilities were evaluated using a Transwell invasion assay and cells were counted after 24 h incubation. (D) Images of wound healing assay and (E) Transwell invasion assay, magnification × 200. Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation n=5. **P<0.01 vs. control. OSM, oncostatin M.
The transfection efficiency of MCP-1siRNA in osteoblasts
To further verify that the stimulating effect of OSM on osteoblast progression was associated with MCP-1, MCP-1 mRNA levels were measured following the treatment of cells with OSM. Interference efficiency was identified by RT-qPCR and western blotting, which detected the mRNA and protein levels of MCP-1, respectively. The results demonstrated that the mRNA and protein levels of MCP-1were significantly increased in the OSM group, compared with the control group (P<0.01; Fig. 3). However, the mRNA and protein levels of MCP-1 were decreased in the OSM+siMCP-1 group compared with the OSM+mock group and similar to the OSM group (P<0.01; Fig. 3). These results demonstrated that transfection with siMCP-1 significantly decreased MCP-1 expression.
Figure 3.
The silencing effect of siMCP-1 in OSM stimulated osteoblasts was determined. (A) The silencing effect of siMCP-1 was detected by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction following siMCP-1 transfection and/or OSM stimulation (B and C) The silencing effect of siMCP-1 was detected by western blotting following siMCP-1 transfection and/or OSM stimulation. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation n=5. **P<0.01 vs. control and ##P<0.01 vs. OSM+mock. OSM+siMCP-1 group, group transfected with siMCP-1 and treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; OSM+mock group, group transfected with non-specific siRNA and treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; OSM group, control group treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; control group, control group that received no treatment; OSM, oncostatin M; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; si, small interfering.
Effect of MCP-1 silencing on OSM-induced cell progression
To verify the effect of MCP-1 silencing on OSM-induced cell progression, an MTT assay was performed to measure cell viability, a wound healing assay was used to measure cell migration ability and a Transwell invasion assay was used to determine cell invasion. The results demonstrated that cell viability, wound healing area and cell invasion were significantly increased in the OSM group compared with the control group (all P<0.01) and significantly decreased in the OSM+siMCP-1 group compared with the OSM+mock group (all P<0.01; Fig. 4). Cell viability, migration and invasion were similar in the OSM+mock and OSM groups. Cell viability increased 73% in the OSM group, compared with the control, while cell viability decreased 33% in the OSM+siMCP-1 group, compared with the OSM group (Fig. 4A). The wound healing area increased 111% in the OSM group, compared with the control, while that of OSM + siMCP-1 group decreased 44% compared with the OSM group (Fig. 4B). Cell invasion activity of the OSM group increased 610%, compared with the control, whereas that of the OSM+siMCP-1 group decreased 77%, compared with the OSM group, a little higher compared with the control group (P<0.01; Fig. 4C).
Figure 4.
Effect of MCP-1 silencing on OSM induced cell progression. (A) An MTT assay was performed to detect cell viability and cells were counted 24 h following stimulation with OSM (30 ng/ml). (B) Cell migration was measured by performing a wound healing assay. (C) Cell invasion abilities were evaluated by performing a Transwell invasion assay and cells were counted following 24 h incubation. Images of (D) wound healing assay and (E) Transwell invasion assay, magnification ×200. Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation n=5. **P<0.01 vs. control and ##P<0.01 vs. OSM+mock. OSM+siMCP-1 group, group transfected with siMCP-1 and treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; OSM+mock group, group transfected with non-specific siRNA and treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; OSM group, control group treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; control group, control group that received no treatment; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; OSM, oncostatin M; si, small interfering.
MCP-1-mediated OSM promotes the phosphorylation of protein kinase B (Akt)
To assess whether MCP-1 is associated with the regulation of OSM on Akt phosphorylation in osteoblasts, western blot analysis was performed. The results demonstrated that OSM significantly enhanced Akt phosphorylation levels compared with the control (P<0.01) and that these effects were partially blocked following siMCP-1 transfection (P<0.01; Fig. 5A). The phosphorylation levels of Akt in the OSM+siMCO-1 group decreased by 66% compared with the OSM+mock group (P<0.01; Fig. 5A and B).
Figure 5.
MCP-1 mediated OSM regulated Akt phosphorylation and MMP expression. (A and B) MCP-1 mediated OSM-stimulated Akt phosphorylation. Western blotting was performed to measure the phosphorylation of Akt. (C, D and E) MCP-1 mediated OSM regulated the expression of MMPs. (C) Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction and (D and E) western blotting were performed. Data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation. n=5. **P<0.01 vs. control and ##P<0.01 vs. OSM+mock. OSM+siMCP-1 group, group transfected with siMCP-1 and treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; OSM+mock group, group transfected with non-specific siRNA and treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; OSM group, control group treated with 30 ng/ml OSM; control group, control group that received no treatment; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; OSM, oncostatin M; Akt, protein kinase B; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; si, small interfering.
MCP-1-mediated OSM regulates MMP production
To further clarify the underlying mechanism of invasion activity induced by OSM, levels of MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-3 mRNA and protein were measured in the siMCP-1+OSM groups. The results demonstrated that OSM significantly increased MMP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-3 mRNA and protein levels compared with the control (P<0.01; Fig. 5C-E). However, these effects were partially blocked by siMCP-1 transfection; MMP-1 and MMP-2 levels were significantly decreased in the OSM+siMCP-1 group compared with the OSM+mock group (P<0.01; Fig. 5C-E). Although transfection with siMCP-1 decreased the mRNA and protein levels of MMP-3, compared with the group that underwent treatment with OSM, this decrease was not significant (Fig. 5C-E).
Discussion
Skeletal repair and remodeling throughout life are essential to maintain bone integrity. Cytokines and chemokines are important factors that regulate cell recruitment during activation of the bone remodeling process. Although increasing attention has been given to the role of OSM during osteoblast development, it remains unknown whether OSM is associated with MCP-1during this process. Therefore, the present study was performed to determine the underlying molecular mechanisms of OSM on MCP-1 during osteoblast activity.The activation and resorption of the bone matrix, and the formation of new bones are processes that occur during the bone remodeling process (31). Chemokines are small proteins weighing 8–10 kDa, which serve important roles in host defense systems and help to maintain normal tissues status (32,33). Therefore, the present study determined the effects of different cytokines, including OSM, IL-1, IL-6, IL-11 and LIF on the expression of different chemokines, including MCP-1, MIP1α and RANTES. The results suggested that OSM stimulated MCP-1 production in a dose-dependent manner and that the effect of 50 ng/ml OSM on MCP-1 was almost equal to that of 10 ng/ml IL-1, which has been previously reported to stimulate chemokine activity (34,35). MIP1α directly stimulates osteoclast production and RANTES induces osteoclast differentiation (36). However, the results of the current study demonstrated that only IL-1 upregulated the expression of MIP1α and RANTES. Although elevated IL-6 and LIF levels have been reported in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, IL factors, such as IL-6, LIF and IL-11 did not stimulate the production of MCP-1, MIP1α and RANTES in the present study. This may be due to the fact that osteoblasts exhibit low levels of IL-6, LIF and IL-11 receptors (37).The present study subsequently verified whether OSM induces the progression of osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner. The effects of OSM (10, 30 and 50 ng/ml) on the viability, migration and invasion of osteoblasts were assessed. Following the silencing of MCP-1 expression by siRNA, the expression of MCP-1 mRNA and protein were not increased in osteoblasts following treatment with OSM and neither were osteoblast viability, migration and invasion. This suggests that MCP-1 mediates the stimulatory action of OSM in osteoblasts. In addition, cell signaling activated by OSM in osteoblasts maybe associated with Akt phosphorylation. The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway serves an important role in cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. Mice that have experienced Akt gene knockout grow slowly and exhibit signs of osteoporosis, including the increased apoptosis of osteoblasts (38). By contrast, the activation of Akt signaling in mature osteoblasts may inhibit apoptosis and prolong the life of osteoblasts (39). The results of the current study revealed that the phosphorylation of Akt was increased in osteoblasts treated with OSM; however, this increase was attenuated by MCP-1 silencing. This indicates that OSM activates Akt in osteoblasts via MCP-1, which may, in turn stimulate cell proliferation.MMPs exist in the bone matrix and are proteases that degrade collagens, regulate the proteolysis of extracellular matrix structural proteins and induce cell metastasis (40,41). MMP-2 is secreted by osteoblasts and initiates bone reabsorption and formation by degrading the bone matrix, acting as the coupling factor that co-regulates bone reabsorption and bone formation (42,43). It has been demonstrated that levels of MMP-1 and MMP-3 are elevated in rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts (44). In the present study, levels of MMP-1, −2 and −3 were elevated in cells treated with OSM. Following transfection with siMCP-1, the pathway was blocked and the levels of MMP-1 and MMP-2 decreased. Levels of MMP-3 also decreased following transfection, although this decrease was not significant. This suggests that OSM treatment primarily affects MMP-1 (collagenases) and MMP-2 (gelatinases) in osteoblasts but has a smaller effect on MMP-3 (stromelysin). Furthermore, these results indicate that this process is mediated by MCP-1.In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that OSM affects the viability, migration and invasion of osteoblasts. These effects may be mediated by MCP-1, which regulate levels of phosphorylated Akt and the activation of MMP-1 and MMP-2. The results of the current study may provide novel insights and targets for skeletal repair and remodeling in clinical applications.
Authors: Emma C Walker; Narelle E McGregor; Ingrid J Poulton; Melissa Solano; Sueli Pompolo; Tania J Fernandes; Matthew J Constable; Geoff C Nicholson; Jian-Guo Zhang; Nicos A Nicola; Matthew T Gillespie; T John Martin; Natalie A Sims Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-01-04 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Camila Slompo; Camila P Buzalaf; Carla A Damante; Gisele M Martins; Angélica R Hannas; Marília A R Buzalaf; Rodrigo C Oliveira Journal: Braz Dent J Date: 2012