Literature DB >> 30015781

Sex-specific echocardiographic reference values: the women's point of view.

Marta Petitto1, Roberta Esposito1, Regina Sorrentino1, Maria Lembo1, Federica Luciano1, Anna Maria De Roberto1, Lucia La Mura1, Enrica Pezzullo1, Silvia Maffei2, Maurizio Galderisi1, Patrizio Lancellotti3,4.   

Abstract

: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and outcomes of cardiac diseases are influenced by the activity of sex steroid hormones. These hormonal differences explain the later development of heart diseases in women in comparison with men and the different clinical picture, management and prognosis. Echocardiography is a noninvasive and easily available technique for the analysis of cardiac structure and function. The aim of the present review is to underline the most important echocardiographic differences between sexes. Several echocardiographic studies have found differences in healthy populations between women and men. Sex-specific difference of some of these parameters, such as left ventricular (LV) linear dimensions and left atrial volume, can be explained on the grounds of smaller body size of women, but other parameters (LV volumes, stroke volume and ejection fraction, right ventricular size and systolic function) are specifically lower in women, even after adjusting for body size and age. Sex-specific differences of standard Doppler and Tissue Doppler diastolic indices remain controversial, but it is likely for aging to affect LV diastolic function more in women than in men. Global longitudinal strain appears to be higher in women during the childbearing age - a finding that also highlights a possible hormonal influence in women. All these findings have practical implications, and sex-specific reference values are necessary for the majority of echocardiographic parameters in order to distinguish normalcy from disease. Careful attention on specific cut-off points in women could avoid misinterpretation, inappropriate management and delayed treatment of cardiac diseases such as valvular disease and heart failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30015781     DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)        ISSN: 1558-2027            Impact factor:   2.160


  5 in total

1.  Sex as a Biological Variable: A 5-Year Progress Report and Call to Action.

Authors:  Matthew E Arnegard; Lori A Whitten; Chyren Hunter; Janine Austin Clayton
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Age- and Sex-Differences in Cardiac Characteristics Determined by Echocardiography in Masters Athletes.

Authors:  Savannah V Wooten; Stefan Moestl; Phil Chilibeck; José Ramón Alvero Cruz; Uwe Mittag; Jens Tank; Hirofumi Tanaka; Jörn Rittweger; Fabian Hoffmann
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  The strain and strain rate imaging paradox in echocardiography: overabundant literature in the last two decades but still uncertain clinical utility in an individual case.

Authors:  Gian Luigi Nicolosi
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2020-12-26

4.  Determinants of improvement of left ventricular mechano-energetic efficiency in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Maria Lembo; Valentina Trimarco; Maria Virginia Manzi; Costantino Mancusi; Giovanni Esposito; Salvatore Esposito; Carmine Morisco; Raffaele Izzo; Bruno Trimarco
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-28

5.  National trends in heart failure mortality in men and women, United Kingdom, 2000-2017.

Authors:  Clare J Taylor; José M Ordóñez-Mena; Nicholas R Jones; Andrea K Roalfe; Sarah Lay-Flurrie; Tom Marshall; F D Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 17.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.