Literature DB >> 30014882

Predicting early death in older adults with cancer.

Rabia Boulahssass1, Sebastien Gonfrier2, Jean-Marc Ferrero3, Marine Sanchez4, Véronique Mari5, Olivier Moranne6, Cyrielle Rambaud7, Francine Auben8, Jean-Michel Hannoun Levi9, Jean-Marc Bereder10, Isabelle Bereder11, Patrick Baque12, Jean Michel Turpin13, Anne-Claire Frin14, Delphine Ouvrier15, Delphine Borchiellini16, Remy Largillier17, Guillaume Sacco18, Jerome Delotte19, Cyprien Arlaud20, Daniel Benchimol21, Matthieu Durand22, Ludovic Evesque23, Abakar Mahamat24, Gilles Poissonnet25, Jérôme Mouroux26, Jérôme Barriere27, Emmanuel Benizri28, Thierry Piche29, Joel Guigay30, Eric Francois31, Olivier Guerin32.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting early death after a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is very difficult in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system to estimate risk of death at 100 days in elderly cancer patients to assist the therapeutic decision.
METHODS: This was a multicentric, prospective cohort study approved by an ethics committee. Elderly cancer patients aged older than 70 years were enrolled before the final therapeutic decision. A standardised CGA was made before the treatment decision at baseline. Within 100 days, event (death), oncologic and geriatric data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to select the risk factors for the overall population. Score points were assigned to each risk factor using the β coefficient. Internal validation was performed by a bootstrap method. Calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test and accuracy with the mean c-statistic.
FINDINGS: One thousand fifty patients (mean age: 82 years) joined the study from April 2012 to December 2014. The independent predictors were metastatic cancers (odds ratio [OR] 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], [1.7-3.5] p<0 .001); gait speed<0.8 m/s (OR 2.1; 95% CI [1.3-3.3] p=0.001); Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) < 17 (OR 8; 95% CI; [3.7-17.3] p<0.001), MNA ≤23.5 and ≥ 17 (OR 4.4; 95% CI, [2.1-9.1) p<0.001); performance status (PS) > 2 (OR 1.7; 95% CI, [1.1-2.6)] p=0.015) and cancers other than breast cancer (OR 4; 95% CI, [2.1-7.9] p<0.001). We attributed 4 points for MNA<17, 3 points for MNA between ≤23.5 and ≥ 17, 2 points for metastatic cancers, 1 point for gait speed <0.8 m/s, 1 point for PS > 2 and 3 points for cancers other than breast cancer. The risk of death at 100 days was 4% for 0 to 6 points, 24% for 7 to 8 points, 39% for 9 to 10 points and 67% for 11 points.
INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this is the first score which estimates early death in elderly cancer patients. The system could assist in the treatment decision for elderly cancer patients.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Comprehensive geriatric assessment; Elderly; Prediction of death; Treatment decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30014882     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  13 in total

Review 1.  Arti Hurria and the progress in integrating the geriatric assessment into oncology: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper.

Authors:  Clark DuMontier; Mina S Sedrak; Wee Kheng Soo; Cindy Kenis; Grant R Williams; Kristen Haase; Magnus Harneshaug; Hira Mian; Kah Poh Loh; Siri Rostoft; William Dale; Harvey Jay Cohen
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Geriatric Assessment Predictors of 1-Year Mortality in Older Adults With GI Malignancies: A Survival Tree Analysis.

Authors:  Grant R Williams; Chen Dai; Smith Giri; Mustafa Al-Obaidi; Christian Harmon; Kelly M Kenzik; Andrew McDonald; Olumide Gbolahan; Darryl Outlaw; Moh'd Khushman; Joshua Richman; Smita Bhatia
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2022-09

3.  Effectiveness of Geriatric Assessment-Driven Interventions on Survival and Functional and Nutritional Status in Older Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial (EGeSOR).

Authors:  Elena Paillaud; Lydia Brugel; Chloe Bertolus; Melany Baron; Emilie Bequignon; Philippe Caillet; Thomas Schouman; Jean Lacau Saint Guily; Sophie Périé; Eric Bouvard; Marie Laurent; Didier Salvan; Laurence Chaumette; Laure de Decker; Benoit Piot; Beatrix Barry; Agathe Raynaud-Simon; Elisabeth Sauvaget; Christine Bach; Antoine Bizard; Abderrahmane Bounar; Aurelien Minard; Bechara Aziz; Eric Chevalier; Dominique Chevalier; Cedric Gaxatte; Olivier Malard; Evelyne Liuu; Sandrine Lacour; Laetitia Gregoire; Charlotte Lafont; Florence Canouï-Poitrine
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Metastatic disease in head & neck oncology.

Authors:  Paolo Pisani; Mario Airoldi; Anastasia Allais; Paolo Aluffi Valletti; Mariapina Battista; Marco Benazzo; Roberto Briatore; Salvatore Cacciola; Salvatore Cocuzza; Andrea Colombo; Bice Conti; Alberto Costanzo; Laura Della Vecchia; Nerina Denaro; Cesare Fantozzi; Danilo Galizia; Massimiliano Garzaro; Ida Genta; Gabriela Alejandra Iasi; Marco Krengli; Vincenzo Landolfo; Giovanni Vittorio Lanza; Mauro Magnano; Maurizio Mancuso; Roberto Maroldi; Laura Masini; Marco Carlo Merlano; Marco Piemonte; Silvia Pisani; Adriele Prina-Mello; Luca Prioglio; Maria Gabriella Rugiu; Felice Scasso; Agostino Serra; Guido Valente; Micol Zannetti; Angelo Zigliani
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity and Death in Older Adults with Colon Cancer: Results of MOST Study.

Authors:  Frédérique Retornaz; Olivier Guillem; Frédérique Rousseau; Francois Morvan; Yves Rinaldi; Sophie Nahon; Chantal Castagna; Rabia Boulahssass; Michel Grino; Dany Gholam
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-08-06

6.  Nutritional status according to the mini nutritional assessment (MNA)® as potential prognostic factor for health and treatment outcomes in patients with cancer - a systematic review.

Authors:  G Torbahn; T Strauss; C C Sieber; E Kiesswetter; D Volkert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  The Desire to Better Understand Older Adults with Solid Tumors to Improve Management: Assessment and Guided Interventions-The French PACA EST Cohort Experience.

Authors:  Rabia Boulahssass; Sebastien Gonfrier; Noémie Champigny; Sandra Lassalle; Eric François; Paul Hofman; Olivier Guerin
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Prediction of Chemotoxicity, Unplanned Hospitalizations and Early Death in Older Patients with Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jaime Feliu; Enrique Espinosa; Laura Basterretxea; Irene Paredero; Elisenda Llabrés; Beatriz Jiménez-Munárriz; Maite Antonio-Rebollo; Beatriz Losada; Alvaro Pinto; Ana Belén Custodio; María Del Mar Muñoz; Jenifer Gómez-Mediavilla; María-Dolores Torregrosa; Gema Soler; Patricia Cruz; Oliver Higuera; María-José Molina-Garrido
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  PG-SGA SF in nutrition assessment and survival prediction for elderly patients with cancer.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Xiang-Rui Li; Xi Zhang; Jia-Shan Ding; Tong Liu; Liang Qian; Meng-Meng Song; Chun-Hua Song; Rocco Barazzoni; Meng Tang; Kun-Hua Wang; Hong-Xia Xu; Han-Ping Shi
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  Development, validation and clinical impact of a prediction model for 6-month mortality in older cancer patients: the GRADE.

Authors:  Eurydice Angeli; Kader Chouahnia; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Boris Duchemann; Thomas Aparicio; Elena Paillaud; Laurent Zelek; Guilhem Bousquet; Frédéric Pamoukdjian
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.