Recent findings revealed that type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a chronic inflammatory disease and an islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP)/amylin, is deposited within pancreatic islets. IAPP/amylin has been reported to activate NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in infiltrated macrophages. NLRP3, an intracellular pattern recognition receptor, has been shown to recognize pathogens and/or metabolites and complexes with the adopter protein apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase-recruitment domain ASC to form a huge complex, called an inflammasome, an interleukin (IL)-1β-processing platform. Although reactive oxygen species (ROS) were reported to be involved in activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, we were hypothesized that IAPP could directly activate NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to islets β-cell death. We analyzed expression of the inflammasome components ASC, NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β, IAPP/amylin, and insulin immunohistochemically in Langerhans' islets of autopsy cases. The initial event of NLRP3 inflammasome activation was assessed using a cell-free system consisting of NLRP3 and ASC with the amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay. IAPP/amylin deposition in Langerhans' islets was detected and significantly correlated with expressions of IL-1β and ASC. IAPP/amylin directly interacted with NLRP3 and initiated an interaction between NLRP3 and ASC in a cell-free system. The deposition of IAPP/amylin in β-cells of Langerhans' islets may act together with the expression level of an inflammasome component, ASC, to regulate IL-1β processing, and directly lead to the dysfunction of β-cells. The interaction between IAPP/amylin and NLRP3 could be an attractive drug target to avoid both inflammation and β-cell death for T2D therapy.
Recent findings revealed that type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a chronicinflammatory disease and an islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP)/amylin, is deposited within pancreatic islets. IAPP/amylin has been reported to activate NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome in infiltrated macrophages. NLRP3, an intracellular pattern recognition receptor, has been shown to recognize pathogens and/or metabolites and complexes with the adopter protein apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase-recruitment domain ASC to form a huge complex, called an inflammasome, an interleukin (IL)-1β-processing platform. Although reactive oxygen species (ROS) were reported to be involved in activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, we were hypothesized that IAPP could directly activate NLRP3 inflammasome, leading to islets β-cell death. We analyzed expression of the inflammasome components ASC, NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β, IAPP/amylin, and insulin immunohistochemically in Langerhans' islets of autopsy cases. The initial event of NLRP3 inflammasome activation was assessed using a cell-free system consisting of NLRP3 and ASC with the amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay. IAPP/amylin deposition in Langerhans' islets was detected and significantly correlated with expressions of IL-1β and ASC. IAPP/amylin directly interacted with NLRP3 and initiated an interaction between NLRP3 and ASC in a cell-free system. The deposition of IAPP/amylin in β-cells of Langerhans' islets may act together with the expression level of an inflammasome component, ASC, to regulate IL-1β processing, and directly lead to the dysfunction of β-cells. The interaction between IAPP/amylin and NLRP3 could be an attractive drug target to avoid both inflammation and β-cell death for T2D therapy.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease. The number of patients with type 2
diabetes mellitus (T2D) has increased in the world. T2D is considered to be a
chronic sterile inflammatory disease because of the elevation of serum inflammatory
cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6.[1] In addition, IL-1β has also been suggested to negatively affect the
insulin-producing pancreatic β-cell function, and recent studies suggested that
treatment with the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra cured T2D.[2]NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 (NLRP3), also known as cryopyrin, is
an intracellular pattern recognition receptor that is activated by the recognition
of pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules and/or damage-associated
molecular pattern molecules.[3] Activated NLRP3 interacts with the adaptor protein ASC to construct a huge
signalosome called inflammasome, which activates pro-caspase-1, leading to IL-1β
processing and activation in a complex.[4-6]NLRP3 has also been reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases
including T2D, atherosclerosis, obesity, and gout.[7,8] Furthermore, the role of NLRP3
in diseases was associated with those in central nerve, lung disease, liver, kidney,
and aging.[9-12] These diseases are thought to
be caused by endogenous metabolites, which activate inflammasome.Recently, it was reported that when a human islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP)/amylin
transgene is expressed in mice or rats, amyloid is deposited within pancreatic
islets, leading to a reduced β-cell mass.[13,14] It was also reported that an
endogenous metabolite, human amyloidogenicIAPP/amylin, can trigger activation of
the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-primed
infiltrated macrophages or dendritic cells, not in islet β-cells.[7] These findings prompted us to test the expression of inflammasome components
in Langerhans’ islets and investigate whether IAPP/amylin directly activates NLRP3
inflammasome.In this study, we report an analysis of the expression of NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1,
IL-1β, and IAPP/amylin in Langerhans’ islets in the pancreas and the effect of
IAPP/amylin on NLRP3 inflammasome using reconstituted NLRP3 inflammasome in a
cell-free system.
Methods
Human pancreatic samples
Paraffin-embedded blocks of the human pancreas were selected from the autopsy
files of the Department of Pathology of Ehime University. The study was approved
by the Human Research Ethical Committee of Ehime University (reference number
1301001). Samples from diabeticpatients should be included; however, because of
the non-consolidated anonymous experiment, we do not know which samples were
from diabeticpatients.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical analysis was carried out using the anti-ASCmouse monoclonal
antibody developed in our previous study.[15] Anti-NLRP3mouse monoclonal antibody [Nalpy3-b] was purchased from Alexis
Biochemicals (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-caspase-1mouse monoclonal antibody
(#2225) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).
Anti-IL-1β rabbitpolyclonal antibody (ab2105) and anti–IAPP/amylinmouse
monoclonal antibody (ab115766) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK).
Anti-insulinGuinea pigpolyclonal antibody kit (A0654) was purchased from Dako
(Carpinteria, CA, USA).Three-micrometer-thick sections were obtained from formalin-fixed
paraffin-embedded tissues. The sections were deparaffinized in xylene and
rehydrated in an ethanol series with a decreasing concentration. Endogenous
peroxidase activity was blocked by the addition of 1% H2O2methanol for 30 min. The primary antibody was diluted in blocking buffer and
exposed to the tissues overnight at 4°C. Their binding was detected using
EnVision+ Mouse/Rabbit/HRP (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA), and positive signals
were revealed by the addition of diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB).
Tissue sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. A control experiment was
performed by omitting the primary antibody from the staining procedure, and no
specific staining was found.
Evaluation of expressions of ASC, NLRP3, capsase-1, IL-1β, and
IAPP/amylin
For the evaluation of protein expressions of Langerhans’ islets in
immunochemistry, we defined the protein-positive score as follows: 3 (plus) is
strong, complete submembranous and uniform, intense intracellular staining; 2
(plus) is weak complete submembranous staining or uniform, intense intracellular
staining; 1 (plus) is weak, incomplete submembranous or partial intracellular
staining in any proportion of cells; and 0 is no specific staining. Ten
Langerhans’ islets were evaluated using the categories above from each specimen
under 200× magnification in the best-stained area of each section. Data are
presented in Table
1.
Table 1.
Clinicopathological data and expression of protein-positive score of
inflammasome components and amylin in islets of Langerhans in autopsy
cases.
Case
Age (years)
Sex
HbA1c (NGST%)
NLRP3
ASC
Caspase-1
IL-1β
Amylin
1
66
F
6.3
1.7 ± 0.48
1.7 ± 0.67
0.4 ± 0.52
2.1 ± 0.57
1.6 ± 0.52
2
75
M
8.3
1.2 ± 0.42
1.8 ± 0.32
0.3 ± 0.48
1.8 ± 0.42
1.1 ± 0.32
3
93
M
5.8
1.4 ± 0.52
1.3 ± 0.48
1.4 ± 0.84
1.4 ± 0.52
0.6 ± 0.52
4
69
M
6.1
0.4 ± 0.52
1.1 ± 0.32
1.6 ± 0.51
1.4 ± 0.70
0.9 ± 0.32
5
62
M
6.7
1.1 ± 0.32
2.1 ± 0.57
0.6 ± 0.84
2.1 ± 0.88
1.7 ± 0.67
6
65
M
8.5
1.5 ± 0.53
1.2 ± 0.42
0.1 ± 0.32
1.4 ± 0.52
1.7 ± 0.67
7
81
M
7.2
0.6 ± 0.52
0.7 ± 0.48
0.1 ± 0.32
1.3 ± 0.52
0.6 ± 0.52
8
57
M
5.3
0.8 ± 0.42
0.4 ± 0.71
0.9 ± 0.74
1.1 ± 0.32
0.8 ± 0.42
9
59
M
11.2
1.3 ± 0.48
2.2 ± 0.63
0.4 ± 0.52
2.4 ± 0.70
2.7 ± 0.48
NLRP3: NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein 3; IL:
interleukin.
Age: age at autopsy. Sex: female (F) and male (M); Values are
mean ± SD of protein positive-scores from 10 individually evaluated
islets of Langerhans in each case.
Clinicopathological data and expression of protein-positive score of
inflammasome components and amylin in islets of Langerhans in autopsy
cases.NLRP3: NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains-containing protein 3; IL:
interleukin.Age: age at autopsy. Sex: female (F) and male (M); Values are
mean ± SD of protein positive-scores from 10 individually evaluated
islets of Langerhans in each case.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Three-micrometer-thick sections were obtained from formalin-fixed
paraffin-embedded tissues. The sections were deparaffinized in xylene and
rehydrated in an ethanol series with a decreasing concentration. The tissue was
exposed to anti-IL-1β rabbitpolyclonal antibody (ab2105) for 1 h at room
temperature followed by tetramethylrhodamine (TRITC)-conjugated swine
anti-rabbit immunoglobulins (R156) (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA). The tissue was
then exposed to anti-insulinGuinea pigpolyclonal antibody (A0654) (Dako,
Carpinteria, CA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature followed by fluorescein
(FITC)-conjugated affinity pure goat anti-Guinea pig IgG F(ab′)2 fragment
specific antibody (106-095-006) (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA,
USA).
Recombinant protein synthesis using a wheat germ cell-free system
The NLRP3 entry clones, pDONR221-NLRP3-FL, DONR221-NLRP3-(Exons 1-2),
pDONR221-NLRP3-(Exons 3-9), pDONR221-NLRP3-(Exons 4-9), and pDONR221-ASC, were
constructed as previously reported.[16] The constructed plasmids were used to synthesize specific proteins with
the WEPRO1240 Expression Kit (Cell-free, Inc., Matsuyama, Japan) followed by
Western blotting.
Amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay
Synthesized protein–protein interactions were assessed using the amplified
luminescent proximity homogeneous assay (Alpha). A total of 100 ng of each
protein was applied to Alpha buffer (100-mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.01% (v/v)
Tween20), 1 mg/mL BSA, 17 µg/mL streptavidin-conjugated Alpha donor beads
(PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA), 17 µg/mL protein-A-conjugated Alpha acceptor
beads, and 5 µg/mL anti-FLAG mAb M2, and incubated in an AlphaPlate-384 shallow
well (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at 25°C for 24 h. The fluorescence emission
signals of each well were measured using an EnSpire™ Multimode Plate Reader
(PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
Immunoprecipitation
Three micrograms of biotinylated IAPP/amylin and 1 μg of FLAG-NLRP3-FL,
FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 1-2), FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 3-9), and FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 4-9) lysed
in 300 μL of NP-40 buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 142.5 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L
MgCl2, 10 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.6), 0.2 mmol/L
phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF), and 1 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetraacetic
acid (EDTA)) were precipitated with 20 μL of streptavidin-conjugated agarose
beads (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and incubated for 3 h at 4°C. The
precipitations were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Detection on the
blotting membranes was performed using anti-FLAG mAb M2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO, USA).
Chemicals
Human synthesized α−IAPP/amylin (4219-v) was purchased from PEPTIDE INSTITUTE,
INC. (Osaka, Japan). Biotinylated IAPP/amylin (AS-64451-05) was purchased from
AnaSpec (Fremont, CA, USA).
Statistics
Results are presented as the mean and standard deviation of data from three
independent experiments, and the significance of differences was evaluated using
Mann–Whitney U test. A P < 0.05 was considered
significant. Correlations were examined using Pearson’s product–moment
correlation coefficient.
Results
Expression of inflammasome components in Langerhans’ islets of human
pancreatic tissues
Immunohistochemical staining of Langerhans’ islets
We examined the expression of inflammasome components such as ASC, NLRP3,
caspase-1, and the substrate IL-1β in paraffin-embedded pancreatic tissue
sections from autopsy cases by immunohistochemistry (Figure 1: ASC, NLRP3, caspase-1, and
IL-1β, and Table
1). We also examined the expression of IAPP/amylin and a β-cell
marker, insulin, in the same specimens to evaluate the deposition of
IAPP/amylin and amounts of β-cells in Langerhans’ islets by
immunohistochemistry (Figure 1). In general, varied positive staining signals of ASC,
NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β, IAPP/amylin, and insulin were observed (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Expression of NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, IL-1β, and IAPP/amylin in
Langerhans’ islets of pancreas. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded
specimens of nine autopsy cases were immunostained with specific
antibodies to ASC, NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β, amylin, and insulin as
indicated. Representative Langerhans’ islets in each case are
presented. Parallel hematoxylin and eosin staining is presented on
the left. The bar is 100 μm. The cases are summarized in Table
1.
Expression of NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, IL-1β, and IAPP/amylin in
Langerhans’ islets of pancreas. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded
specimens of nine autopsy cases were immunostained with specific
antibodies to ASC, NLRP3, caspase-1, IL-1β, amylin, and insulin as
indicated. Representative Langerhans’ islets in each case are
presented. Parallel hematoxylin and eosin staining is presented on
the left. The bar is 100 μm. The cases are summarized in Table
1.Positive staining signals of ASC were located in subpopulations of cells of
Langerhans’ islets. Cytosolic signals were also found in cells of
Langerhans’ islets (Figure
1, ASC). A weak staining signal of NLRP3 was noted in Langerhans’
islets and even diffusely in acinar cells of exocrine cells (Figure 1, NLRP3). A
weak staining signal of NLRP3 was found in Langerhans’ islets (Figure 1, Caspase-1).
An intense staining signal of IL-1β was noted in subpopulations of cells in
the cellular periphery of Langerhans’ islets (Figure 1, IL-1β). A positive staining
signal of IAPP/amylin was detected in cells and interstitial tissue in
Langerhans’ islets of pancreatic tissues, especially in hyaline-degenerated
islets of Case 9 (Figure
1, Amylin).
Immunofluorescence staining of IL-1β and insulin in Langerhans’ islets of
pancreatic tissues
We investigated whether IL-1β-positive cells were β-cells that release
insulin in Langerhans’ islets using immunofluorescence microscopy. The data
revealed that the green insulin-positive cells were almost identical to the
red IL-1β-positive cells on dual immunofluorescence microscopy (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Dual immunofluorescence microscopy of islet of Langerhans in
pancreas. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens were
stained with anti-insulin Guinea pig polyclonal antibody with
FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (left, insulin, green) and
anti-IL-1β rabbit polyclonal antibody with TRITC-conjugated
secondary antibody (middle, IL-1β, red) and were observed using a
fluorescence microscope. A merged image is shown (right, merge,
yellow). The bar is 10 µm.
Dual immunofluorescence microscopy of islet of Langerhans in
pancreas. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded specimens were
stained with anti-insulinGuinea pigpolyclonal antibody with
FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (left, insulin, green) and
anti-IL-1β rabbitpolyclonal antibody with TRITC-conjugated
secondary antibody (middle, IL-1β, red) and were observed using a
fluorescence microscope. A merged image is shown (right, merge,
yellow). The bar is 10 µm.
ASC-positive score correlated with IL-1β-positive score
Since ASC was reported to be indispensable for IL-1β processing by inflammasome,
we examined whether the ASC-positive score was correlated with the
IL-1β-positive score in the same patient samples as presented in Table 1. We found that
the ASC-positive score was significantly correlated with the IL-1β-positive
score based on Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient R = 0.937 with
P = 0.000191 (Figure 3(a), Table 1).
Figure 3.
Correlation diagram comparing IAPP/amylin-positive scores and each value.
(a) Correlation analysis between ASC-positive score and IL-1β-positive
score. (b) Correlation analysis between IAPP/amylin-positive score and
ASC-positive score. (c) Correlation analysis between
IAPP/amylin-positive score and IL-1β-positive score. (d) Correlation
analysis between IAPP/amylin-positive score and NLRP3-positive score.
(e) Correlation analysis between IAPP/amylin-positive score and
caspase-1-positive score. (f) Correlation analysis between
IAPP/amylin-positive score and serum HbA1c (%).
Correlation diagram comparing IAPP/amylin-positive scores and each value.
(a) Correlation analysis between ASC-positive score and IL-1β-positive
score. (b) Correlation analysis between IAPP/amylin-positive score and
ASC-positive score. (c) Correlation analysis between
IAPP/amylin-positive score and IL-1β-positive score. (d) Correlation
analysis between IAPP/amylin-positive score and NLRP3-positive score.
(e) Correlation analysis between IAPP/amylin-positive score and
caspase-1-positive score. (f) Correlation analysis between
IAPP/amylin-positive score and serum HbA1c (%).
IAPP/amylin-positive score correlated with ASC and IL-1β-positive
score
Since IAPP/amylin was reported to activate inflammasome, we examined whether an
IAPP/amylin-positive score was correlated with NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1, and
IL-1β−positive scores in the same patient samples as presented in Table 1. We found that
an IAPP/amylin-positive score was significantly correlated with ASC and
IL-1β-positive scores with based on Pearson’s product–moment correlation
coefficient R = 0.742 with P = 0.0220 (Figure 3(b)) and R = 0.823
with P = 0.0640, respectively (Figure 3(c)). However,
there was no significant correlation between an IAPP/amylin-positive score and
NLRP3 or caspase-1 (Figure
3(d) and (f)).
IAPP/amylin-positive score correlated with most recent HbA1c value of
patients
We examined whether an IAPP/amylin-positive score was correlated with the most
recent HbA1c value of patients presented in Table 1. We found that an
IAPP/amylin-positive score was significantly correlated with the HbA1c value
based on Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient R = 0.774 with P = 0.0143 (Figure 3(f)).
IAPP/amylin-induced interaction between NLRP3 and ASC in a cell-free
system
C-terminal biotinylated full-length NLRP3 (NLRP3-FL-Btn) and N-terminal
FLAG-tagged full-length ASC (FLAG-ASC-FL) are schematically indicated in Figure 4(a).
Figure 4.
IAPP/amylin-induced interaction between NLRP3 and ASC in a cell-free
system. (a) Schematic representations of NLRP3 and ASC. Synthetic
C-terminal biotinylated full-length NLRP3 (NLRP3-FL-Btn) and N-terminal
FLAG-tagged ASC (FLAG-ASC-FL) are indicated. The pyrin domain (PYD) is
indicated by black boxes. The caspase recruitment domain (CARD) is
indicated by a dark gray box. The nucleotide-binding oligomerization
domain (NOD) is indicated by a light gray box. Leucine-rich repeats are
indicated by a striped box. Amino acid sequence numbers are indicated
under each schema. (b) Interaction between NLRP3-FL-Btn and FLAG-ASC-FL
was detected by an amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay
(Alpha). Responses (counts) were measured using an EnSpire™ Multimode
Plate Reader. The results are given as means ± standard deviation from
triplicate wells. *P-value < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant using Mann–Whitney U test. (c)
IAPP/amylin directly interact with NLRP3 in a dose-dependent manner.
Representative results are shown from three independent experiments.
IAPP/amylin-induced interaction between NLRP3 and ASC in a cell-free
system. (a) Schematic representations of NLRP3 and ASC. SyntheticC-terminal biotinylated full-length NLRP3 (NLRP3-FL-Btn) and N-terminal
FLAG-tagged ASC (FLAG-ASC-FL) are indicated. The pyrin domain (PYD) is
indicated by black boxes. The caspase recruitment domain (CARD) is
indicated by a dark gray box. The nucleotide-binding oligomerization
domain (NOD) is indicated by a light gray box. Leucine-rich repeats are
indicated by a striped box. Amino acid sequence numbers are indicated
under each schema. (b) Interaction between NLRP3-FL-Btn and FLAG-ASC-FL
was detected by an amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay
(Alpha). Responses (counts) were measured using an EnSpire™ Multimode
Plate Reader. The results are given as means ± standard deviation from
triplicate wells. *P-value < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant using Mann–Whitney U test. (c)
IAPP/amylin directly interact with NLRP3 in a dose-dependent manner.
Representative results are shown from three independent experiments.Using wheat germ cell-free system–specific expression plasmids, NLRP3-FL-Btn and
FLAG-ASC-FL proteins were also synthesized as described previously.[16,17]Since we previously reported the construction of NLRP3 inflammasome in a
cell-free system that is able to detect NLRP3 inflammasome–activating ligands,
we investigated whether IAPP/amylin was able to induce interaction between NLRP3
and ASC using the reconstituted NLRP3 inflammasome. Expectedly, IAPP/amylin
induced the interaction between FLAG-ASC-FL and NLRP3-FL-Btn in the cell-free
system (Figure 4(b),
Amylin). A positive control poly(I:C) also induced the interaction between
FLAG-ASC-FL and NLRP3-FL-Btn (Figure 4(b), poly(I:C)), whereas neither MDP, LPS nor poly(C)
induced this interaction (Figure 4(b), muramyl dipeptide (MDP), LPS, and poly(C),
respectively).To confirm the direct interaction between NLRP3 and IAPP/amylin, we examined the
interaction between N-terminal FLAG-tagged full-length NLRP3 (FLAG-NLRP3-FL) and
biotinylated IAPP/amylin. The Alpha signals of these interactions gradually
increased with IAPP/amylin in dose-dependent manner (Figure 4(c)).
IAPP/amylin directly interacted with NLRP3
We assessed the specific binding site of NLRP3 with biotinylated IAPP/amylin by
Alpha and immunoprecipitation. FLAG-NLRP3-FL and its truncated proteins, such as
FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 1-2), FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 3-9), and FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 4-9), were
prepared (Figure 5(a)).
Stronger Alpha signals were detected between FLAG-NLRP3-FL, FLAG-NLRP3-(Exon
3-9), or FLAG-NLRP3-(Exon 4-9) and biotinylated IAPP/amylin (Figure 5(b)).
Figure 5.
IAPP/amylin directly interacted with LRR domain of NLRP3. (a) A schematic
representation of the NLRP3 structure depicts Exon components and
truncated proteins. (b) Synthetic protein-protein interactions between
biotinylated IAPP/amylin and FLAG-NLRP3-FL, FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 1-2),
FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 3-9), or FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 4-9) were assessed by
amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay (Alpha). The results
are given as means ± standard deviation from triplicate wells. *P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant using Mann–Whitney U test. (c) Interactions between
biotinylated IAPP/amylin and FLAG-NLRP3-FL, FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 1-2),
FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 3-9), or FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 4-9) were assessed by
immunoprecipitation. The asterisk indicates a non-specific band.
WT: wild-type; P: precipitation; WB: western blot; Lysate: lysate after
immunoprecipitation.
IAPP/amylin directly interacted with LRR domain of NLRP3. (a) A schematic
representation of the NLRP3 structure depicts Exon components and
truncated proteins. (b) Synthetic protein-protein interactions between
biotinylated IAPP/amylin and FLAG-NLRP3-FL, FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 1-2),
FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 3-9), or FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 4-9) were assessed by
amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay (Alpha). The results
are given as means ± standard deviation from triplicate wells. *P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically
significant using Mann–Whitney U test. (c) Interactions between
biotinylated IAPP/amylin and FLAG-NLRP3-FL, FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 1-2),
FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 3-9), or FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 4-9) were assessed by
immunoprecipitation. The asterisk indicates a non-specific band.WT: wild-type; P: precipitation; WB: western blot; Lysate: lysate after
immunoprecipitation.These interactions between IAPP/amylin and NLRP3 or its truncated forms were
confirmed by immunoprecipitation. FLAG-NLRP3-FL or FLAG-NLRP3-(Exons 4-9) was
co-precipitated with 10 µg/mL IAPP/amylin (Figure 5(c)).
Discussion
Over the past decade, accumulating data have indicated that the pattern recognition
receptors in innate immunity can recognize excessive nutrient intake associated with
a stress-related biological event. Especially, the NLRP3 inflammasome was reported
to mediate inflammatory and stress responses in various tissues that contribute to
the development of metabolic disorders.[18]T2D was reported to be an inflammatory disease linked to the pathogenesis of
hypersecretion of IL-1β and activation.[1,2,19,20] IAPP/amylin is co-secreted
with insulin from islet β-cells into the extracellular spaces in islets by the
exocytosis of secretory granules.[21] Oxidative stress was reported to induce pancreatic β-cell death.[22] The pancreatic β-cell death was considered to be caused by IL-1β released by
infiltrated macrophages.[23] The sources of IL-1β were reported to be primary macrophages that had
phagocytosed IAPP/amylin through frustrated phagocytosis, resulting in reactive
oxygen species (ROS) formation.[24] The IAPP/amylin or generated ROS are thought to be involved in the
inflammasome complex nucleated by NLRP3.[25]Consistent with this, a recent paper reported that amyloidogenichumanIAPP/amylin
can trigger the processing of IL-1β from bone marrow–derived macrophages in a mouse model.[7] The inflammasome activation and pancreatic β-cell death mediated by
IAPP/amylin were suggested to be involved in a ROS-sensitive manner.[26]In this study, we have found additional evidence that both ASC and IL-1β are highly
expressed in β-cells in Langerhans’ islets of humanpancreatic tissues, which
correlates with the deposition of IAPP/amylin. Also, IAPP/amylin directly initiates
an interaction between NLRP3 and ASC, which may lead to NLRP3 inflammasome
activation in a cell-free system.The distributions of inflammasome components in Langerhans’ islets are interesting
(Figure 1). Both NLRP3
and caspase-1 expressions were diffusely distributed in the cells of Langerhans’
islets (Figure 1, NLRP3 and
Caspase-1). However, ASC and IL-1β were likely to be restricted in specific cells
(Figure 1, ASC and
IL-1β). Dual immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that red-fluorescence-positive
IL-1β-expressing cells are almost identical to green-fluorescence-positive
insulin-expressing cells suggested to be β-cells in Langerhans’ islets (Figure 2). Thus, we suggested
that expressions of both ASC and IL-1β are involved in β-cell functions.In support of the description above, there is a significant correlation between
ASC-positive and IL-1β-positive scores (Figure 3(a)), and both scores were
significantly correlated with an IAPP/amylin-positive score (Figure 3(b) and (c)). However, there were no significant
correlations between an NLRP3-positive score or capase-1-positive score and
IAPP/amylin-positive score (Figure
3(d) and (e)).
IAPP/amylin deposition in Langerhans’ islets is associated with T2D progression.[27] Consistent with this, an IAPP/amylin-positive score was significantly
correlated with the most recently obtained HbA1c value (Figure 3(f)).Does IAPP/amylin induces an interaction between NLRP3 and ASC without ROS machinery?
To answer this, we performed recently developed cell-free experiments.[17] Cell-free experiments, with no ROS, revealed that IAPP/amylin directly
induces the interaction between NLRP3 and ASC confirmed by Alpha and
immunoprecipitation, which could be an initial event of NLRP3 inflammasome
activation. Consistent with the known function of NLRP3, IAPP/amylin directly
interacted with LRR domain (NLRP3-Exon (4-9)) of NLRP3 (Figures 4 and 5). Inflammasome activation reportedly leads
to IL-1β secretion accompanied by pyroptotic cell death.[6] In addition, pancreatic β-cells and endothelial cells were reported to
express IL-1R1, which could mediate the function of increased IL-1β.[28,29] Thus, direct
activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in β-cells in Langerhans’ islets by IAPP/amylin
may contribute inflammation and β-cell death in T2D in addition to the ROS-mediated
mechanism in living cells. Although we cannot deny the accumulated evidence that ROS
are crucial intrinsic triggers of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in infiltrating macrophages,[7] we provide evidence that IAPP/amylin could directly trigger NLRP3
inflammasome in β-cells of Langerhans’ islets in human tissues.In conclusion, IAPP/amylin directly interacts with NLRP3 to activate NLRP3
inflammasome, and this interaction could be an attractive drug target to avoid
inflammation and β-cell death during therapy for diabetes, although there are
mechanisms in NLRP3 inflammasome and diabetes pathology in human tissues that still
require elucidation. Our data may help to advance understanding of these
mechanisms.
Authors: J Janson; W C Soeller; P C Roche; R T Nelson; A J Torchia; D K Kreutter; P C Butler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1996-07-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: C B Verchere; D A D'Alessio; R D Palmiter; G C Weir; S Bonner-Weir; D G Baskin; S E Kahn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1996-04-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Seth L Masters; Aisling Dunne; Shoba L Subramanian; Rebecca L Hull; Gillian M Tannahill; Fiona A Sharp; Christine Becker; Luigi Franchi; Eiji Yoshihara; Zhe Chen; Niamh Mullooly; Lisa A Mielke; James Harris; Rebecca C Coll; Kingston H G Mills; K Hun Mok; Philip Newsholme; Gabriel Nuñez; Junji Yodoi; Steven E Kahn; Ed C Lavelle; Luke A J O'Neill Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2010-09-12 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Yun-Hee Youm; Ryan W Grant; Laura R McCabe; Diana C Albarado; Kim Yen Nguyen; Anthony Ravussin; Paul Pistell; Susan Newman; Renee Carter; Amanda Laque; Heike Münzberg; Clifford J Rosen; Donald K Ingram; J Michael Salbaum; Vishwa Deep Dixit Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: S Zraika; R L Hull; J Udayasankar; K Aston-Mourney; S L Subramanian; R Kisilevsky; W A Szarek; S E Kahn Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Andrew N Bubak; Cheryl Beseler; Christina N Como; Christina M Coughlan; Noah R Johnson; James E Hassell; Anna M Burnet; Teresa Mescher; D Scott Schmid; Colin Coleman; Ravi Mahalingam; Randall J Cohrs; Timothy D Boyd; Huntington Potter; Ali H Shilleh; Holger A Russ; Maria A Nagel Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 5.226