MicroRNAs (miRNAs) as small non-coding RNAs act as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes in human cancers, of which miR-149-5p (miR-149) is involved in tumor growth and metastasis, but its role and molecular mechanisms underlying osteosarcoma growth are poorly understood. The correlation of miR-149 expression with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in patients with sarcoma was analyzed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) RNA-sequencing data. Osteosarcoma cell growth affected by miR-149 was evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and colony formation assays. As a result, we found that the expression level of miR-149 was markedly downregulated in human sarcoma samples and were negatively associated with tumor size, acting as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival of the sarcoma patients. Restoration of miR-149 expression suppressed osteosarcoma cell growth, while its knockdown reversed these effects. Furthermore, we identified TNFRSF12A (TNF receptor superfamily member 12A), also called fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) as a direct target of miR-149, and TNFRSF12A and its ligand TNFSF12 (TNF superfamily member 12), also called tumor necrosis factor-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), were both negatively correlated with miR-149 expression in sarcoma samples. Knockdown of TNFRSF12A suppressed cell growth, but its overexpression weakened the antiproliferative effects of miR-149 via the PI3K/AKT (AKT serine/threonine kinase) signaling pathway. Altogether, our findings show that miR-149 functions as a tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma via inhibition of the TWEAK-Fn14 axis and represents a potential therapeutic target in patients with osteosarcoma.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) as small non-coding RNAs act as either tumor suppressors or oncogenes in humancancers, of which miR-149-5p (miR-149) is involved in tumor growth and metastasis, but its role and molecular mechanisms underlying osteosarcoma growth are poorly understood. The correlation of miR-149 expression with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in patients with sarcoma was analyzed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) RNA-sequencing data. Osteosarcoma cell growth affected by miR-149 was evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and colony formation assays. As a result, we found that the expression level of miR-149 was markedly downregulated in humansarcoma samples and were negatively associated with tumor size, acting as an independent prognostic factor for overall survival of the sarcomapatients. Restoration of miR-149 expression suppressed osteosarcoma cell growth, while its knockdown reversed these effects. Furthermore, we identified TNFRSF12A (TNF receptor superfamily member 12A), also called fibroblast growth factor-inducible 14 (Fn14) as a direct target of miR-149, and TNFRSF12A and its ligand TNFSF12 (TNF superfamily member 12), also called tumor necrosis factor-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), were both negatively correlated with miR-149 expression in sarcoma samples. Knockdown of TNFRSF12A suppressed cell growth, but its overexpression weakened the antiproliferative effects of miR-149 via the PI3K/AKT (AKT serine/threonine kinase) signaling pathway. Altogether, our findings show that miR-149 functions as a tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma via inhibition of the TWEAK-Fn14 axis and represents a potential therapeutic target in patients with osteosarcoma.
Osteosarcoma (OS), the most common malignant bone tumor, is an aggressive neoplasm,
occurring primarily in children and young adults.[1] In spite of the advances in multidrug chemotherapy and surgical removal of
the primary tumors, the 5-year overall survival rate and recurrence of OS patients
have not been improved owing to the tumor metastases.[2] A variety of molecular alterations related with critical signal transduction
pathways are implicated in multiple processes of OS pathobiology, such as
proliferation, invasion, survival, and metastasis.[3] Therefore, identifying these important molecular targets may shed light on
the novel approaches for OS diagnosis and therapy.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play key roles in the biological processes, such as cell
proliferation and invasion, by negatively regulating the expression of target genes,
of which miR-149 is reported to be downregulated in breast cancer[4,5] and glioma,[6] correlates with advanced stages, lymph node metastasis, and early recurrence,
and mediates the inhibition of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion via
integrin and Akt signaling.[4-6] In addition,
miR-149 induces cell apoptosis by repressing Akt1 and E2F1 expressions in neuroblastoma,[7] represses cell proliferation and invasion in bladder cancer,[8] and blocks cycle progression in gastric cancer.[9] Given the downregulation of miR-149 in some cancers, it is subject to DNA
hypermethylation that mediates transcriptional repression in cervical carcinogenesis[10] and colorectal cancer.[11] However, several studies show that miR-149 is highly expressed in metastatic melanoma[12] and accelerates cell proliferation by reducing sex-determining region Y-box 2
(SOX2), NANOG (Nanog homeobox), and octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4)
expressions that are required for syndecan-1-mediated androgen-refractory prostate cancer[13] and decreases cell apoptosis in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia,[14] suggesting that miR-149 exhibits a critical role in tumor progression.Tumor necrosis factor–related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), a member of the
tumor necrosis factor superfamily, acts by binding to its exclusive receptor
fibroblast growth factor–inducible 14 (Fn14). Activation of the TWEAK/Fn14 axis is
implicated in the tumorigenesis of multiple malignancies.[15] Increasing evidence shows that the ectopic expression of the TWEAK/Fn14 axis
is associated with poor prognosis and promotes cell survival and invasion in
prostate cancer,[16] neuroblastoma,[17] and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).[18] But targeting of the TWEAK/Fn14 axis reduces cancer-induced cachexia and
prolongs survival.[19] To clarify the functions and the underlying mechanisms of miR-149 in human
OS, in this study, we discovered that miR-149 inhibited OS growth via inhibition of
the TWEAK–Fn14 axis and indicated a potential therapeutic target for OS
patients.
Materials and methods
Clinical data
The clinicopathological and prognostic data for 191 sarcomapatients and 66
adjacent normal samples as well as the relative expression levels of miR-149,
TNFRSF12A, and TWEAK were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas 2015 RNA
sequencing database (https://genome-cancer.ucsc.edu). The protocols used in our study
were approved by the Ethics Committee of Renji Hospital. The information on
clinicopathological characteristics of sarcomapatients is summarized in
Supplementary Table
S1.
Table S1.
Clinicopathologic data of sarcoma patients.
Variables
Number of cases
(%)
191 (100%)
Age (years)
>20
39 (79.58%)
<20
152 (20.42%)
Gender
Male
89 (46.60%)
Female
102 (53.40%)
Tumor size (cm)
>3
69 (36.13%)
<3
122 (63.87%)
Lymph node infiltration
No
99 (51.83%)
Yes
92 (48.17%)
Distant metastases
No
171 (89.53%)
Yes
20 (10.47%)
Materials
OS cell lines (U-2 OS, Saos-2, MG-63, SW-1353, HOS, and 143B) used in our
experiments were from Chinese Academy of Science Shanghai Cell Bank (Shanghai,
P.R. China). Lentivirus-mediated miR-149 overexpression and miR-149 shRNA and
TNFRSF12A overexpression vectors and the negative control (NC) vector were from
GeneChem (Shanghai, P.R. China); the primary antibodies of TWEAK (rabbit
polyclonal antibody, ab37170), Fn14 (also called TWEAKR, mouse monoclonal
antibody, ab21127), p-PI3K p85 (rabbit polyclonal antibody, ab182651), anti-PI3K
(mouse monoclonal antibody, BYK-0128R), AKT (rabbit polyclonal antibody,
ab126811), p-AKT (rabbit polyclonal antibody, ab18206), and glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; rabbit polyclonal antibody, ab70699) were from
Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA).
Drugs and reagents
Specific details for the sources of drugs and reagents were described in
Supplementary Table
S2.
The detailed description was referred from the previous study.[20]
Cell culture
OS cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented
with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL of penicillin, and
100 μg/mL of streptomycin. Cells in this medium were placed in a humidified
atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37°C.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
To quantitatively confirm the expression levels of miR-149, real-time polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed. Total RNA was extracted from each clone
using TRIzol according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription was
carried out using M-MLV and cDNA amplification was performed using the SYBR
Green Master Mix kit according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. miR-149 was
amplified using a specific primer: forward, 5’-GGCTCTGGCTCCGTGTCTT-3’, and
reverse, 5’-CAGTGCAGGGT CCGAGGTATT-3’; U6 forward, 5’-CAAATTCGTGAAGCGTTCCATA-3’,
and reverse, 5’-AGTGCAGGGTCCGAGGTA TTC-3’; and GAPDH forward, CCTGTACGCC AA
CACAGTGC, and reverse, ATACTCCTGCTTG CTGATCC. GAPDH gene or U6 was used as an
endogenous control. Data were analyzed using the comparative Ct method. Three
separate experiments were performed for each clone.
Western blot analysis
The cells were lysed using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Thermo
Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) with protease inhibitors. The proteins were
subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes
(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), which were probed with anti-TWEAK
(1:1000), anti-Fn14 (1:1000), anti-p-PI3K p85 (1:1000), anti-PI3K (1:1000),
anti-AKT (1:1000), anti-p-AKT (1:1000), and anti-GAPDH (1:1000), followed by
horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody. The proteins of
interest were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate. GAPDH
was used as the loading control.
Cell viability assay
Cell proliferation was analyzed by the
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. After
the OS cells were transfected with miR-149 vector (20 μL, multiplicity of
infection (MOI) = 50) for 48 h and incubated in 96-well plates at a density of
4 × 103 cells per well with DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS. Then the
cells were treated with 20 μL of MTT and subsequently incubated with 150 μL of
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 10 min. The color reaction was measured at 570 nm
using an Enzyme Immunoassay Analyzer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA,
USA).
Colony formation assay
2× DMEM containing 20% FBS and 2 × 103 cells was mixed with an equal volume of
0.7% agarose and immediately plated in 6-well plates containing an underlayer of
0.5% agarose made in 1× DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. The plates were cultured
at 37°C under 5% CO2 for 7 days.
Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay
OS cells were seeded into 24-well plates. After 24-h incubation, pmirGLO report
vector carrying wild-type (WT) 3’-UTR or mutated 3’-UTR of miR-149 targets was
co-transfected with miR-149 (10 μL, MOI = 50) or NC into the OS cells. At 48 h
after transfection, luciferase activities were examined with a Dual-Luciferase
Reporter Assay System (Promega Corporation, Beijing, China).
Statistical analysis
SPSS 20.0 was used for the statistical analysis. All of the values were recorded
as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) from at least three independent
experiments. Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to evaluate the differences
between each group. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis was used to
analyze the correlations. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval
between the dates of surgery and death and the Overall survival and disease-free
survival (DFS; or recurrence) curves were analyzed with the Kaplan–Meier method
and log-rank test. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Results
miR-149 expression is downregulated in human OS samples
The expression levels of miR-149 in human OS samples (n = 191) and adjacent
normal tissues (n = 66) were analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)
sequencing data, which indicated a decreased expression level of miR-149 in OS
samples (P < 0.0001; Figure 1(a)) as well as in the
pair-matched OS tissues (n = 66, P < 0.0001;
Figure 1(b)) in
comparison to the adjacent normal tissues. Then, we examined the expression
level of miR-149 in OS samples with tumor size ⩾3 cm (n = 69) or <3 cm
(n = 122), suggesting that miR-149 expression was markedly downregulated in
patients with tumor size ⩾ 3 cm compared to those with tumor size < 3 cm
(P < 0.0001; Figure 1(c)).
Figure 1.
The expression of miR-149 in human sarcoma samples. (a) TCGA cohort
analysis of miR-149 expression level in sarcoma samples and the adjacent
normal tissues. (b) TCGA cohort analysis of miR-149 expression level in
pair-matched sarcoma samples. (c) TCGA cohort analysis of miR-149
expression level in sarcoma samples with tumor size <3 cm and ⩾3 cm.
(d), (e) Overall survival and recurrence curves demonstrated the link of
the high or low expression of miR-149 with the percent survival and
recurrence of OS patients.
The expression of miR-149 in humansarcoma samples. (a) TCGA cohort
analysis of miR-149 expression level in sarcoma samples and the adjacent
normal tissues. (b) TCGA cohort analysis of miR-149 expression level in
pair-matched sarcoma samples. (c) TCGA cohort analysis of miR-149
expression level in sarcoma samples with tumor size <3 cm and ⩾3 cm.
(d), (e) Overall survival and recurrence curves demonstrated the link of
the high or low expression of miR-149 with the percent survival and
recurrence of OS patients.
The expression of miR-149 was correlated with tumor size and overall survival
in OS patients
To confirm the correlation of miR-149 expression with OS patients, we analyzed
the association between its expression and clinicopathological characteristics
and prognosis in OS patients. As shown in Table 1, miR-149 expression was
negatively correlated with age (P = 0.033) and
tumor size (P = 0.001), but had no link with
gender, lymph node infiltration, and distant metastasis in OS patients (each
P > 0.05). We further analyzed the
correlation of miR-149 expression with overall survival and recurrence in OS
patients y using Kaplan–Meier and multivariate analysis, which demonstrated that
miR-149 expression was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival
(P = 0.024; Supplementary Table S3) in OS
patients. Overall survival curve showed that the patients with high miR-149
expression harbored longer survival time (P = 0.0178; Figure
1(d)) compared to those with low miR-149 expression, but the tumor
recurrence curve showed no difference between the patients with high miR-149
expression and those with low miR-149 expression (P = 0.136; Figure
1(e)).
Table 1.
The correlation of miR-149 expression with clinicopathological factors of
sarcoma patients.
Variables
Cases (n)
miR-149
expression
P value
Low
High
Total
191
36
155
Age (years)
⩾20
39
12
27
<20
152
24
128
0.033
Gender
Male
89
13
76
Female
102
23
79
0.163
Tumor size (cm)
⩾3
69
22
47
<3
122
14
108
0.001
Lymph node infiltration
No
95
22
73
Yes
96
14
82
0.131
Distant metastases
No
171
29
142
Yes
20
7
13
0.052
Table S3.
Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with overall
survival.
overall
survival
Multivariate
Factors
Univariate P
HR
95% CI
P value
Age (years) (⩾20 vs. <20)
0.959
NA
Gender (male vs. female)
0.970
NA
Tumor size (cm) (⩾3 vs. <3)
0.012
0.573
0.368-1.215
NS
Lymph node infiltration (Yes vs.
No)
0.113
NA
Distant metastasis (Yes vs. No)
0.073
NA
miR-30e expression (high vs.
low)
0.021
0.469
0.247-0.890
0.024
The correlation of miR-149 expression with clinicopathological factors of
sarcomapatients.
Ectopic expression of miR-149 inhibited cell growth
Having confirmed the negative correlation of miR-149 expression with tumor size
in OS patients (Figure
1(c) and Table
1), we explored the functions of miR-149 in OS cell growth. The
expression levels of miR-149 were examined in different OS cell lines by
quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis, which
indicated that miR-149 displayed high expression in MG-63 and HOS cell lines but
low expression in U-2 OS and Saos-2 cell lines (Figure 2(a)). Thus, miR-149
overexpression vector was used to transfect into U-2 OS and Saos-2 cell lines
with low miR-149 expression. After transfection for 48 h, miR-149 expression
levels were verified by qRT-PCR analysis (**P < 0.01; Figure
2(b)). Then, MTT assay was performed to investigate cell
proliferation capacity, indicating that the overexpression of miR-149
significantly inhibited the cell proliferation activity (Figure 2(c) and (d)) and colony formation ability (Figure
2(e) and (f)) in U-2OS and Saos-2
cells.
Figure 2.
The effects of miR-149 on cell proliferation and colony formation. (a)
Expression levels of miR-149 in different OS cell lines indicated by
qRT-PCR analysis. (b) Expression level of miR-149 after miR-149
overexpression vector transfection into U-2 OS and Saos-2 cell lines for
48 h. (c), (d) The effects of miR-149 overexpression on cell
proliferation by MTT assay. (e), (f) The effects of miR-149
overexpression on cell colony formation. Data are the means ± SEM of
three experiments.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
The effects of miR-149 on cell proliferation and colony formation. (a)
Expression levels of miR-149 in different OS cell lines indicated by
qRT-PCR analysis. (b) Expression level of miR-149 after miR-149
overexpression vector transfection into U-2 OS and Saos-2 cell lines for
48 h. (c), (d) The effects of miR-149 overexpression on cell
proliferation by MTT assay. (e), (f) The effects of miR-149
overexpression on cell colony formation. Data are the means ± SEM of
three experiments.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.Furthermore, miR-149 shRNA vector was transfected into MG-63 and HOS cell lines
with high miR-149 expression. After transfection for 48 h, miR-149 expression
levels were confirmed by qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 3(a)). Cell growth assays showed
that the knockdown of miR-149 accelerated cell proliferation and colony
formation capability in MG-63 and HOS cell lines, respectively, indicated by MTT
(Figure 3(b) and
(c)) and colony
formation assays (Figure
3(d) and (e)).
Figure 3.
The effects of miR-149 knockdown on cell proliferation and colony
formation. (a) Expression level of miR-149 after miR-149 shRNA vector
transfection into MG-63 and HOS cell lines for 48 h. (b), (c) The
effects of miR-149 knockdown on cell proliferation by MTT assay. (d),
(e) The effects of miR-149 knockdown on cell colony formation. Data are
the means ± SEM of three experiments.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
The effects of miR-149 knockdown on cell proliferation and colony
formation. (a) Expression level of miR-149 after miR-149 shRNA vector
transfection into MG-63 and HOS cell lines for 48 h. (b), (c) The
effects of miR-149 knockdown on cell proliferation by MTT assay. (d),
(e) The effects of miR-149 knockdown on cell colony formation. Data are
the means ± SEM of three experiments.*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
TNFRSF12A is a direct target of miR-149
To expound the molecular mechanisms by which miR-149 suppresses OS cell growth,
we attempted to identify publicly available miR-149 targets by prediction
websites (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/targetSite.php). Among hundreds of
target genes, TNFRSF12A was considered as the most suitable candidate target
gene of miR-149 due to its low mirSVR score and high PhastCons score. To confirm
whether miR-149 directly binds to the 3’-UTR of TNFRSF12A, the WT 3’-UTR or
mutant 3’-UTR target sequences of TNFRSF12A (Figure 4(a)) were cloned into the
luciferase reporter vector and transfected into U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells. The
results showed that miR-149 decreased both the mRNA (Figure 4(b)) and protein expression
levels of TNFRSF12A (Figure
4(c)) in U-2OS and Saos-2 cells, indicated by qRT-PCR and Western
blot analysis. Moreover, miR-149 decreased the luciferase activity of WT 3’-UTR
of TNFRSF12A in U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells, but had no effect on that of mutant
3’-UTR of TNFRSF12A (Figure
4(d)).
Figure 4.
TNFRSF12A is a novel target of miR-149. (a) The miR-149 putative binding
sites and the corresponding mutant sites of TNFRSF12A. (b), (c)
Expression level of TNFRSF12A was examined by qRT-PCR and Western blot
analysis in the miR-149 and miR-NC groups. (d) Luciferase activity of
TNFRSF12A 3’-UTR was detected after miR-149 vector transfection. Data
were normalized to the luciferase activity after transfection with
miR-NC. Data are the means ± SEM of three experiments.
**P < 0.01.
TNFRSF12A is a novel target of miR-149. (a) The miR-149 putative binding
sites and the corresponding mutant sites of TNFRSF12A. (b), (c)
Expression level of TNFRSF12A was examined by qRT-PCR and Western blot
analysis in the miR-149 and miR-NC groups. (d) Luciferase activity of
TNFRSF12A 3’-UTR was detected after miR-149 vector transfection. Data
were normalized to the luciferase activity after transfection with
miR-NC. Data are the means ± SEM of three experiments.**P < 0.01.
Knockdown of TNFRSF12A represses cell proliferation and colony
formation
To address the correlation of miR-149 with TNFRSF12A and TWEAK expression in OS
samples, the expression levels of TNFRSF12A and TWEAK in sarcoma tissues
(n = 191) were analyzed by TCGA cohort, which showed that both TNFRSF12A and
TWEAK expression levels were remarkably upregulated in sarcoma samples compared
to the adjacent normal tissues (n = 66; Figure 5(a) and (b)), and the correlation analysis
indicated that miR-149 had the negative correlation with TNFRSF12A (r = –4.613,
P < 0.01) and TWEAK expression (r = –3.475,
P < 0.01) in sarcoma tissues (Figure 5(c) and (d)). Furthermore, to
figure out the functions of TNFRSF12A in OS cells, we constructed the TNFRSF12A
shRNA stably transfected U-2 OS and Saos-2 cell lines and detected its mRNA and
protein expression levels by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis (Figure 5(e) and (f)). Then, the knockdown
of TNFRSF12A significantly repressed cell proliferation (Figure 5(g) and (h)) and the colony formation abilities in
OS cells (Figure 5(i)
and (j)).
Figure 5.
The effect of TNFRSF12A knockdown on cell proliferation and colony
formation. (a), (b) qRT-PCR analysis was used to detect the expression
of TNFRSF12A and TWEAK in sarcoma and adjacent normal tissues. (c), (d)
The correlation analysis of the association between miR-149 and
TNFRSF12A and TWEAK expression in sarcoma tissues. (e), (f) Expression
level of TNFRSF12A was determined by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis
in TNFRSF12A shRNA–transfected U-2 OS and Saos-2 cell lines. (g), (h)
The effects of TNFRSF12A knockdown on cell proliferation by MTT assay.
(i), (j) The effects of TNFRSF12A knockdown on cell colony formation.
Data are the means ± SEM of three experiments.
**P < 0.01.
The effect of TNFRSF12A knockdown on cell proliferation and colony
formation. (a), (b) qRT-PCR analysis was used to detect the expression
of TNFRSF12A and TWEAK in sarcoma and adjacent normal tissues. (c), (d)
The correlation analysis of the association between miR-149 and
TNFRSF12A and TWEAK expression in sarcoma tissues. (e), (f) Expression
level of TNFRSF12A was determined by qRT-PCR and Western blot analysis
in TNFRSF12A shRNA–transfected U-2 OS and Saos-2 cell lines. (g), (h)
The effects of TNFRSF12A knockdown on cell proliferation by MTT assay.
(i), (j) The effects of TNFRSF12A knockdown on cell colony formation.
Data are the means ± SEM of three experiments.**P < 0.01.
miR-149 mimic undermines TNFRSF12A-induced activation of TWEAK/EGFR
signaling
To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms by which TNFRSF12A mediated miR-149
to modulate cell proliferation, TNFRSF12A overexpression vector was transfected
into miR-149-pretreated U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells, indicating that TNFRSF12A
overexpression promoted cell viability and miR-149 impaired TNFRSF12-induced
cell proliferation (Figure
6(a) and (b)). The protein expression levels of TNFRSF12A, TWEAK, and epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR), PI3K/p-PI3K and AKT/p-AKT as the potential
downstream factors of TNFRSF12A were detected by Western blot analysis,
referring that miR-149 inactivated the TWEAK/EGFR pathway, and TNFRSF12A
attenuated the inhibitory effects of miR-149 on TWEAK/EGFR signaling (Figure 6(c)).
Figure 6.
TNFRSF12A attenuates miR-149-induced inactivation of TWEAK/EGFR
signaling. (a), (b) The effects of TNFRSF12A overexpression on cell
proliferation in miR-149-transfected U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells indicated
by MTT assay. (c) The effects of TNFRSF12A overexpression on the
activity of the TWEAK/EGFR/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in
miR-149-transfected U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells indicated by Western blot
analysis.
TNFRSF12A attenuates miR-149-induced inactivation of TWEAK/EGFR
signaling. (a), (b) The effects of TNFRSF12A overexpression on cell
proliferation in miR-149-transfected U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells indicated
by MTT assay. (c) The effects of TNFRSF12A overexpression on the
activity of the TWEAK/EGFR/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in
miR-149-transfected U-2 OS and Saos-2 cells indicated by Western blot
analysis.
Discussion
Increasing evidence shows that miR-149 exerts a pivotal role in multiple types of
cancers and is associated with distant metastasis and poor prognosis in
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).[20,21] Also, miR-149 gene rs2292832
polymorphism results in the risk and susceptibility of patients with
cancers.[22-25] However, some studies
illustrate the reduced risk and susceptibility of miR-149 gene rs2292832
polymorphism for overall survival and recurrence in patients with digestive cancers.[26] In this study, we found that the decreased expression of miR-149 was closely
associated with the age and tumor size, and Kaplan–Meier analysis uncovered that
miR-149 was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in sarcomapatients, suggesting that miR-149 might be a potential prognostic biomarker for
sarcomapatients.Recent studies have documented the indispensable role of miR-149 in various diseases
including cancer. miR-149 overexpression represses cell migration and invasion in
colorectal cancer[27] and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in non-small-cell lung cancer,[28] and reverses cancer-associated fibroblast-induced EMT and stem-like
properties in gastric cancer.[29] miR-149 decreases cell proliferation and migration in renal cell carcinoma[30] and attenuates chemoresistance in breast cancer.[31] However, miR-149 promotes glioma cell growth by targeting caspase-2/p53/p21 pathways.[32] To further clarify the functions of miR-149 in OS cells, we found that
miR-149 suppressed cell proliferation and colony formation, but the knockdown of
miR-149 reversed these effects, indicating the tumor suppressor role of miR-149 in
OS cells.TWEAK can bind with its receptor Fn14 and the TWEAK/Fn14 axis is implicated in
multiple biological responses including oncogenesis.[33,34] High expression of TWEAK/Fn14,
related with EGFR activation, promotes tumor invasion and metastasis.[35-37] TWEAK–Fn14 interaction
contributes to cell growth, angiogenesis, and drug resistance in gastric cancer.[38] Activation of the TWEAK–Fn14 axis leads to the activation of the PI3K/AKT
signaling pathway, thus promoting the tumorigenesis.[39] In addition, TWEAK induces cardiomyocyte apoptosis and cell cycle activation
in a PI3K/AKT pathway–dependent manner.[40,41] Intriguingly, we first
confirmed that TNFRSF12A was a target of miR-149 and had a negative correlation with
miR-149 expression in OS tissues; knockdown of TNFRSF12A inhibited cell growth and
attenuated miR-149-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation in OS cells. Then, we
found that miR-149 overexpression downregulated the expression of the TWEAK–Fn14
axis and inactivated the PI3K/AKT pathway, but TNFRSF12A overexpression reversed the
inhibitory effects of miR-149 on the TWEAK–Fn14 axis and the PI3K/AKT pathway. The
TWEAK receptorTNFRSF12 is a potential biomarker for glioblastoma,[42] and the antibodies against it curb tumor growth.[43] These findings demonstrated that TNFRSF12A might mediate the tumor suppressor
role of miR-149 in OS cells via the PI3K/AKT pathway.In conclusion, decreased expression of miR-149 represents an independent prognostic
factor for overall survival in sarcomapatients, and miR-149 suppresses tumor growth
of OS cells via inhibition of the TWEAK–Fn14 axis.
Authors: Bin Yang; Ping Yan; Hui Gong; Lin Zuo; Ying Shi; Jian Guo; Rui Guo; Jun Xie; Bao Li Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Saskia M Wilting; Wina Verlaat; Annelieke Jaspers; Nour A Makazaji; Reuven Agami; Chris J L M Meijer; Peter J F Snijders; Renske D M Steenbergen Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: George S Watts; Nhan L Tran; Michael E Berens; Achyut K Bhattacharyya; Mark A Nelson; Elizabeth A Montgomery; Richard E Sampliner Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Patricia A Culp; Donghee Choi; Yongke Zhang; Johnny Yin; Pui Seto; Suzanne E Ybarra; Mian Su; Mien Sho; Roxanne Steinle; Melanie H L Wong; Ferdinand Evangelista; Jennifer Grove; Marie Cardenas; Marjorie James; Eric D Hsi; Debra T Chao; David B Powers; Vanitha Ramakrishnan; Robert Dubridge Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Diana Yu; Elliot Kahen; Christopher L Cubitt; Jeremy McGuire; Jenny Kreahling; Jae Lee; Soner Altiok; Conor C Lynch; Daniel M Sullivan; Damon R Reed Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 4.379