| Literature DB >> 30013855 |
Abstract
Sex structure is very labile between populations and specific for each population because it is a result of genetic, ontogenetic and biocenotic influences on the mollusks. In this study, the age frequency distribution, age-sex structure, and sex ratio were assessed in the wild populations of the Yeso scallop Patinopecten yessoensis (Jay) observed at fifteen sites in the northwestern Sea of Japan (=East Sea). The sex ratio varied between the populations from 0.83:1 to 1.52:1 (males/females), with the mean sex ratio being 1.03 ± 0.05:1. Within a population, the proportions of males and females in term of number differed between age classes. Males were more numerous than females in the younger age classes, and females prevailed over males in the older age classes. It was found that in different scallop populations the sex change occurred at different ages. In the populations that predominantly consisted of young (two- to four-year-old) individuals, males prevailed over females in the age class 2 yr.; the equal male/female proportion was found in the age class 3 yr.; and in older age classes, females prevailed over males. Another pattern was observed in the populations that consisted mainly of middle-aged (five- to six-year-old) individuals. Here, the age-sex ratio became equal at an age of 4-6 years. In the old populations (mainly 6-12-year-olds) the equal male/female proportion was observed at an age of 8-10 years. Thus, the age of sex change was not uniform for the scallop populations. It depended on the age structure of the population and, thus, was socially controlled. The greater number of females in the older age classes suggests a protandric sex change.Entities:
Keywords: Bivalves; Environment; Growth; Growth rates; Mollusks; Population; Populations; Protandry; Scallops; Sex change
Year: 2018 PMID: 30013855 PMCID: PMC6046201 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Sites of sampling of the scallop Patinopecten yessoensis (black circles).
1, Sivuchiya Bay; 2, Severnaya Bay; 3, Kreiserok Bay; 4, Vityaz Bay; 5, near Stenina Island; 6, Pervaya Rechka River Estuary; 7, near Cape Shkota; 8, Lazurnaya Bay; 9, Andreeva Bay; 10, near Putyatina Island; 11, Anna Bay; 12, Rifovaya Bay; 13, Ozero Vtoroe Bay; 14, Melkovodnaya Bay; 15, Srednyaya Bay.
Patinopecten yessoensis.
The male:female ratios in the wild scallop populations inhabited the northwestern part of the Sea of Japan. The populations are arranged according to increase in their most abundant age classes.
| Site, year of sampling | Total number, in parenthesis are numbers of scallops at the age ≤5 and > 5 years old | Age range, years | Most abundant age classes, years | Male:female ratio for population | Starting age of female prevalence, years | Male:female ratio for age classes ≤ 5 years | Male:female ratio for age classes > 5 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Bay, 1988 | 59 (55 + 4) | 2–7 | 2 | 1.36:1 | 4 | 1.62:1 | |
|
| 44 (44 + 0) | 2–5 | 2 and 4 | 1:1 | 3 | 1:1 | |
| At Cape Shkota, 1979 | 37 (21 + 16) | 2–10 | 2 and 7 | 1.06:1 | 4 | 2:1 | |
|
| 73 (44+29) | 2–12 | 3 and 4 | 1.52:1 | 4 | 1.87:1 | 1:1 |
|
| 74 (49+25) | 2–10 | 3 and 6 | 1:1 | 4–5 | 1.13:1 | |
| At Putyatina Island, 1980 | 46 (31 + 15) | 2–11 | 4 | 1:1 | 6 | 1.58:1 | |
| 50 (37 + 13) | 3–9 | 4 and 5 | 5 | 1.06:1 | |||
| Melkovodnaya Bay, 1980 | 61 (33 + 28) | 1–14 | 5 | 1:1 | 6 | 1.64:1 | |
|
| 209 (99 + 110) | 1–10 | 5 and 6 | 1:1 | 5 | 1.36:1 | |
|
| 40 (12 + 28) | 3–14 | 4 and 11–12 | 1:1 | 10 | 5:1 | |
| 25 (7 + 18) | 3–9 | 6 | 1.08:1 | 5–6 | 1.33:1 | 1:1 | |
|
| 68 (28 + 40) | 2–13 | 2 and 6–8 | 6 | 3:1 | ||
| 34 (10 + 24) | 4–8 | 7 and 5 | 6 | 2:1 | |||
| Vityaz Bay, 1979 | 41 (3+38) | 4–13 | 8 | 9 | – | ||
| 31 (2 + 29) | 4–16 | 9 and 12 | 1:1 | 11 | – | 1.07:1 | |
| 102 (15 + 87) | 3–14 | 11 | 8 | 1.80:1 |
Notes.
Bold ratios indicate the higher proportion of females.
Bold and underlined names of the sites indicate populations, where the scallops have the high and low growth rates, correspondingly. An “–” denotes too little data for corresponding index calculation.
Figure 2Patinopecten yessoensis.
The proportion of different aged hermaphrodites per 1 thousand scallops at ages ≥ 2 years.
Figure 3Patinopecten yessoensis.
Sex-age structure of “young” populations (mainly two- to five-year-olds) from Anna Bay (A) and Pervaya Rechka River Estuary (2016) (B). Arrow indicates the first age class in which females start to prevail over males in number.
Figure 4Patinopecten yessoensis.
Sex-age structure of “middle aged” populations (mainly four- to eight-year-olds) from Melkovodnaya Bay (A) and Ozero Vtoroe Bay (B). Arrow indicates the first age class in which females start to prevail over males in number.
Figure 5Patinopecten yessoensis.
Sex-age structure of “old” populations (mainly six to 12-year-olds) from Vityaz Bay (A) and near Stenina Island (B). Arrow indicates the first age class in which females start to prevail over males in number.
Patinopecten yessoensis.
The densities of the occurrences and growth rates in the populations inhabited the northwestern part of the Sea of Japan.
| Site | Density, ind./m2, at site of sampling | Shell height at 1-year-old age, mm | Shell height at 2-year-old age, mm | Shell height at 3-year-old age, mm | Shell height at 4-year-old age, mm | Shell height at 5-year-old age, mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Growth | Rates | ||||
|
| 0.29 | 40.1 ± 2.6 | 79.1 ± 2.8 | 97.9 ± 2.4 | 116.4 ± 2.8 | 130.3 ± 2.8 |
|
| 0.13 | 38.1 ± 0.7 | 73.5 ± 1.5 | 95.6 ± 1.5 | 108.3 ± 1.5 | 113.4 ± 1.0 |
|
| 0.80 | 42.4 ± 0.6 | 81.0 ± 0.7 | 104.7 ± 0.6 | 121.3 ± 0.7 | 132.5 ± 1.1 |
|
| 0.16 | 43.4 ± 1.9 | 80.6 ± 2.3 | 104.5 ± 2.2 | 121.5 ± 2.3 | 127.5 ± 1.7 |
|
| 0.31 | 48.6 ± 0.8 | 88.7 ± 1.0 | 108.0 ± 1.0 | 119.8 ± 1.1 | 125.6 ± 1.3 |
| Middle | Growth | Rates | ||||
| Anna Bay | 2.01 | 52.5 ± 0.8 | 86.9 ± 0.9 | 121.2 ± 0.7 | 134.4 ± 1.1 | 138.2 ± 1.8 |
| At Cape Shkota | 0.19 | 48.3 ± 2.1 | 89.5 ± 1.7 | 116.4 ± 1.3 | 129.2 ± 1.4 | 133.6 ± 1.9 |
| At Putyatina Island | 0.16 | 50.2 ± 1.6 | 87.4 ± 1.2 | 117.0 ± 1.0 | 129.1 ± 1.1 | 135.3 ± 1.8 |
| Melkovodnaya Bay | 0.25 | 39.5 ± 1.8 | 81.7 ± 1.3 | 108.8 ± 1.4 | 126.3 ± 1.3 | 137.7 ± 1.5 |
| Vityaz Bay | 0.27 | 47.2 ± 1.3 | 89.5 ± 1.1 | 116.1 ± 0.9 | 130.6 ± 1.1 | 140.0 ± 1.5 |
| High | Growth | Rates | ||||
| 0.60 | 45.6 ± 1.8 | 96.1 ± 2.0 | 118.7 ± 1.8 | 137.2 ± 1.5 | 148.6 ± 2.3 | |
| 0.22 | 62.6 ± 1.4 | 106.2 ± 1.3 | 129.0 ± 1.3 | 141.8 ± 1.4 | 149.4 ± 1.2 | |
| 1.03 | 65.4 ± 1.0 | 108.4 ± 0.9 | 131.2 ± 0.8 | 143.1 ± 0.8 | 151.3 ± 0.8 | |
| 0.24 | 45.0 ± 1.2 | 89.4 ± 1.5 | 120.5 ± 1.4 | 138.5 ± 1.6 | 150.4 ± 2.3 | |
| 0.67 | 52.7 ± 1.2 | 94.3 ± 1.2 | 116.2 ± 1.3 | 130.0 ± 1.9 | 138.8 ± 1.9 |
Notes.
Bold and underlined names of the sites indicate populations, where the scallops have the high and low growth rates, correspondingly.