David V Sheehan1,2,3,4, Maria Gasior1,2,3,4, Susan L McElroy1,2,3,4, Jana Radewonuk1,2,3,4, Barry K Herman1,2,3,4, James Hudson1,2,3,4. 1. Dr. Sheehan is with the University of South Florida College of Medicine in Tampa, Florida. 2. Drs. Herman and Gasior and Ms. Radewonuk are formerly affiliated with Shire Pharmaceuticals in Lexington, Massachusetts. 3. Dr. McElroy is with the Lindner Center of HOPE and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine in Mason, Ohio. 4. Dr. Hudson is with McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School in Belmont, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Objective: In two Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (NCT01718483 and NCT01718509 at ClinicalTrials.gov), lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) reduced binge eating days/week in adults with moderate-to-severe binge eating disorder (BED). We describe the effects of LDX (50mg and 70mg) on the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS; exploratory endpoint) from both studies. Design: The SDS was assessed at baseline, Week 6, and Week 12/early termination. Analyses included mixed-effects models for repeated measures for the examination of SDS total and domain score changes and a generalized estimating equation model to assess dichotomized remission status (remission [total score ≤6] versus nonremission [total score >6]). Results:Least squares (95% confidence interval [CI]) mean treatment differences for SDS total score change from baseline at Week 12 were -2.80 (-3.98, -1.61) in Study 1 and -3.70 (-4.81, -2.58) in Study 2 (both p<0.001). Least squares (95% CI) mean treatment differences across SDS domains favored LDX over placebo in both studies for the change from baseline at Week 12 (work/school: -0.8 [-1.2, -0.4] and -1.1 [-1.5, -0.7], both p<0.001; social life/leisure activities: -1.0 [-1.4, -0.5] and -1.4 [-1.8, -1.0], both p<0.001; and family life/home responsibilities: -1.0 [-1.4, -0.5] and -1.3 [-1.7, -0.9], both p<0.001). Odds ratios (95% CI) for SDS remission versus nonremission favored LDX over placebo at Week 12 (Study 1: 2.39 [1.44, 3.96]; p<0.001 and Study 2: 5.12 [2.80, 9.33]; p<0.001). Conclusion: These findings indicate that LDX treatment is associated with improvement on the SDS in adults with moderate-to-severe BED.
RCT Entities:
Objective: In two Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (NCT01718483 and NCT01718509 at ClinicalTrials.gov), lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) reduced binge eating days/week in adults with moderate-to-severe binge eating disorder (BED). We describe the effects of LDX (50mg and 70mg) on the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS; exploratory endpoint) from both studies. Design: The SDS was assessed at baseline, Week 6, and Week 12/early termination. Analyses included mixed-effects models for repeated measures for the examination of SDS total and domain score changes and a generalized estimating equation model to assess dichotomized remission status (remission [total score ≤6] versus nonremission [total score >6]). Results: Least squares (95% confidence interval [CI]) mean treatment differences for SDS total score change from baseline at Week 12 were -2.80 (-3.98, -1.61) in Study 1 and -3.70 (-4.81, -2.58) in Study 2 (both p<0.001). Least squares (95% CI) mean treatment differences across SDS domains favored LDX over placebo in both studies for the change from baseline at Week 12 (work/school: -0.8 [-1.2, -0.4] and -1.1 [-1.5, -0.7], both p<0.001; social life/leisure activities: -1.0 [-1.4, -0.5] and -1.4 [-1.8, -1.0], both p<0.001; and family life/home responsibilities: -1.0 [-1.4, -0.5] and -1.3 [-1.7, -0.9], both p<0.001). Odds ratios (95% CI) for SDS remission versus nonremission favored LDX over placebo at Week 12 (Study 1: 2.39 [1.44, 3.96]; p<0.001 and Study 2: 5.12 [2.80, 9.33]; p<0.001). Conclusion: These findings indicate that LDX treatment is associated with improvement on the SDS in adults with moderate-to-severe BED.
Authors: Susan L McElroy; James I Hudson; Julie A Capece; Karen Beyers; Alan C Fisher; Norman R Rosenthal Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-01-29 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: David V Sheehan; Kathy Harnett-Sheehan; Melissa E Spann; Harry F Thompson; Apurva Prakash Journal: Int Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 1.659
Authors: Robert Arbuckle; Mark A Frye; Martin Brecher; Björn Paulsson; Kitty Rajagopalan; Susan Palmer; Alessio Degl' Innocenti Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2008-11-29 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Antonio Preti; Giovanni de Girolamo; Gemma Vilagut; Jordi Alonso; Ron de Graaf; Ronny Bruffaerts; Koen Demyttenaere; Alejandra Pinto-Meza; Josep Maria Haro; Piero Morosini Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Brian P Brennan; Jacqueline L Roberts; Kate V Fogarty; Karina A Reynolds; Jeffrey M Jonas; James I Hudson Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Susan L McElroy; James Hudson; M Celeste Ferreira-Cornwell; Jana Radewonuk; Timothy Whitaker; Maria Gasior Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 7.853