Literature DB >> 30013728

Three principles for radiation safety: time, distance, and shielding.

Jae Hun Kim1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30013728      PMCID: PMC6037814          DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2018.31.3.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Pain        ISSN: 2005-9159


× No keyword cloud information.
Pain physicians usually use C-arm fluoroscopy for the treatment of patients. The C-arm fluoroscope is an important device for pain interventions. However, pain physicians can be exposed to radiation during use of C-arm fluoroscopy. According to a previous study in Korea, most pain physicians were worried about the adverse biological effects of radiation exposure [1]. However not many pain physicians had knowledge of radiation safety [12]. Furthermore, not many pain physicians used radiation protective devices and radiation protective methods [12]. Even though almost all pain physicians had used thyroid protectors and aprons, the use of lead glasses and gloves was low. For reducing radiation exposure, there are 3 principals: time, distance, and shielding.

1. Time

Radiation exposure can be accumulated over the time of exposure. In C-arm fluoroscopy guided interventions, the time spent checking the C-arm fluoroscopy is related to the radiation exposure. The longer the exposure time, the more radiation exposure to the pain physician. Therefore, it is important to reduce the usage time of C-arm fluoroscopy [23]. For reducing the usage time, the physician has to improve his skill in intervention and the radiographer has to check the X-ray at the correct location, and at the right moment without blurred image.

2. Distance

A greater distance from the radiation source can reduce radiation exposure. The amount of radiation exposure is not inversely proportional to the distance from the radiation source, but is inversely proportional to the square of the distance [24]. This means that double the distance from the radiation source can reduce the radiation exposure not to 1/2 but to 1/4. Therefore, maintaining a greater distance from the X-ray generator is a very effective method for radiation safety. In a previous study of radiographers, two steps behind the mobile support structure can decrease the exposure of the radiographer by about 80% [4]. In another study, being only 20 cm farther from the center of the X-ray field can decrease the radiation exposure by about 73% [5].

3. Shielding

There are many shielding devices such as caps, lead glasses, thyroid protectors, aprons, radiation reducing gloves, and so on, for radiation safety during C-arm fluoroscopy-guided interventions. Even though the protective effect is enough for radiation safety, no use of the devices cannot protect the physician from radiation. In Korea, the use rate of the apron and thyroid protector by pain physicians is over 80% [126]. However, the use rate of lead glasses was about 40%, and the use rate of radiation reducing gloves was lower than 35% [1]. The radiation shielding devices are expensive, and the use of shielding devices can be uncomfortable. However, when a physician uses these devices, they can be protected from radiation exposure. Reducing the time of radiation exposure, a greater distance from radiation sources, and the use of shielding devices for radiation protection are important. Even if pain physicians have to use these three principles, I want to emphasize the importance of distance from the radiation source, because the longer distance from the radiation source may be more effective than reducing time or the use of shielding devices. If a pain physician decreases the time of radiation exposure in half, his radiation exposure will be halved. If a pain physician uses radiation protective devices with double the lead equivalent thickness, his radiation exposure will also be halved. However, if a pain physician stands double the distance from a radiation source, his radiation exposure will reduce to 1/4. Physicians do not pay money for a longer distance from the radiation source. Therefore, all physicians can use the principle of greater distance easily. Do you want to reduce your radiation exposure? Please remember the 3 principles; time, distance, and shielding.
  6 in total

1.  Radiation Exposure of the Hand and Chest during C-arm Fluoroscopy-Guided Procedures.

Authors:  Cheol Hee Jung; Jae Sung Ryu; Seung Woo Baek; Ji Hye Oh; Nam Sik Woo; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2013-01-04

2.  How Effective Are Radiation Reducing Gloves in C-arm Fluoroscopy-guided Pain Interventions?

Authors:  Ah Na Kim; Young Jae Chang; Bo Kyung Cheon; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2014-03-28

3.  The Radiation Exposure of Radiographer Related to the Location in C-arm Fluoroscopy-guided Pain Interventions.

Authors:  Young Jae Chang; Ah Na Kim; In Su Oh; Nam Sik Woo; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2014-03-28

4.  Radiation safety and education in the applicants of the final test for the expert of pain medicine.

Authors:  Pyong Eun Park; Jung Min Park; Joo Eun Kang; Jae Hun Cho; Suk Ju Cho; Jae Hun Kim; Woo Seog Sim; Yong Chul Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2012-01-02

5.  The radiation safety education and the pain physicians' efforts to reduce radiation exposure.

Authors:  Tae Hee Kim; Seung Wan Hong; Nam Sik Woo; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2017-03-31

6.  The Survey about the Degree of Damage of Radiation-Protective Shields in Operation Room.

Authors:  Jae Sung Ryu; Seung Woo Baek; Cheol Hee Jung; Suk Ju Cho; Eu Gene Jung; Hae Kyoung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2013-04-03
  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of Nonimage- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block: A Matched Paired Analysis in the Same Individuals.

Authors:  Syn-Hae Yoon; Hanwool Park; Kunhee Lee; Haesol Han; Keum Nae Kang; Gunn Lee; Yun A Han; Seong-Soo Choi
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Application of a tungsten apron for occupational radiation exposure in nursing care of children with neuroblastoma during 131I-meta-iodo-benzyl-guanidine therapy.

Authors:  Yuka Taniguchi; Hiroshi Wakabayashi; Hiroto Yoneyama; Zhuoqing Chen; Kei Morino; Akiko Otosaki; Masako Yamada; Anri Inaki; Daiki Kayano; Seigo Kinuya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Radiation safety for pain physicians: principles and recommendations.

Authors:  Sewon Park; Minjung Kim; Jae Hun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  A case report of radiopharmaceutical needlestick injury with scintigraphic imaging and dose quantification.

Authors:  James Elliott; Mariq Weatherley
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  COVID-19 pandemic and the effect of increased utilisation of mobile X-ray examinations on radiation dose to radiographers.

Authors:  Phoebe Yeung; Jo-Anne Pinson; Michael Lawson; Christopher Leong; Mohamed Khaldoun Badawy
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2022-02-18

6.  Clinical Efficacy of the Transradial Approach in Percutaneous Intervention for a Malfunctioning Arteriovenous Fistula.

Authors:  Hyun Young Choi; Gyoo-Sik Jung; Hee Kang; Ye Na Kim; Hyung Hwan Moon; Jong Hyouk Yun
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-12-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.