| Literature DB >> 30013641 |
Rui Fang1,2, Yong Yang1, Haicheng Han2, Xiaoqing Fu1, Liwen Dong1, Baisheng Xie1, Wei Lu3, Chenyang Ma3, Feng Cui1, Jian Hu4, Jun Wang5.
Abstract
Risk factors for stage I lung adenocarcinoma were analyzed using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography (CT). The patients were divided into case group (stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients) and control group (benign pulmonary nodules patients). All patients were subjected to low-dose high-resolution CT. Multiple linear regression was performed to analyze the CT imaging features of the two groups. Stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients were significantly associated with nodular site (X3, upper left lobe) [95% CI (1.796, 54.695), p=0.008], nodule type (X4) (p<0.001), nodule size (X5) [95% CI (0.614, 0.803), p<0.001], spicule sign (X7) [95% CI (0.029, 0.580), p=0.008], lobulation sign (X8) [95% CI (0.048, 0.673), p=0.011]. The stepwise regression equation is: Logistic (p) =-12.009 + 2.294X3 - 0.327X4 - 0.354X5 - 2.042X7 - 1.713X8. Risk factors of low-dose and high-resolution CT imaging for patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma are nodular site (upper left lobe), nodule type, nodule size, spicule sign, and lobulation sign.Entities:
Keywords: case-control study; computed tomography image; health care; risk factors; stage I lung adenocarcinoma
Year: 2018 PMID: 30013641 PMCID: PMC6036570 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Comparison of the basic information between two groups.
| Variables | Cases | Case group (n=194) | Control group (n=90) | χ2 value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 126 | 82 | 44 | 1.092 | 0.296 |
| Female | 158 | 112 | 46 | ||
| Age (years) | |||||
| <60 | 153 | 101 | 52 | 0.808 | 0.369 |
| ≥60 | 131 | 93 | 38 | ||
| Ethnicity | |||||
| Han nationality | 267 | 183 | 84 | 0.108 | 0.742 |
| Minority | 17 | 11 | 6 | ||
| Marriage status | |||||
| Married | 258 | 178 | 80 | 0.606 | 0.436 |
| Unmarried and divorced | 26 | 16 | 10 | ||
| Degree of education | |||||
| Junior high school and below | 151 | 104 | 57 | 2.482 | 0.289 |
| High school, technical secondary | |||||
| school and college | 74 | 55 | 19 | ||
| College and above | 49 | 35 | 14 | ||
| Smoking | |||||
| Yes | 85 | 56 | 29 | 0.330 | 0.566 |
| No | 199 | 138 | 61 | ||
| Family history of cancer | |||||
| Yes | 52 | 35 | 17 | 0.030 | 0.864 |
| No | 232 | 159 | 73 | ||
Logistic regression analysis of low-dose high-resolution CT imaging features on stage I lung adenocarcinoma.
| Variables | Types | B | SE | Wald | Odd ratio | 95% CI | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoking (X1) | 0.738 | 0.560 | 1.739 | 2.093 | 0.698–6.271 | 0.187 | |
| Family history of cancer (X2) | −1.042 | 0.736 | 2.007 | 0.353 | 0.083–1.491 | 0.157 | |
| Nodular site (X3) | Left upper lobe | 2.294 | 0.872 | 6.925 | 9.910 | 1.796–54.695 | 0.008 |
| Left lower lobe | 0.049 | 1.166 | 0.002 | 1.050 | 0.107–10.334 | 0.996 | |
| Right upper lobe | 1.240 | 0.832 | 2.223 | 3.455 | 0.677–17.633 | 0.136 | |
| Right middle lobe | 2.164 | 0.899 | 5.794 | 8.708 | 1.495–50.726 | 0.016 | |
| Nodule type (X4) | 44.188 | <0.001 | |||||
| Partial solid nodules | 24.995 | 27,265.515 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.999 | |
| Solid nodules | 21.016 | 27,265.515 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.999 | |
| Nodule size (X5) | 19.901 | 27,265.515 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.999 | |
| Purely ground glass-like density nodules | −0.354 | 0.069 | 26.443 | 0.702 | 0.614–0.803 | <0.001 | |
| Bronchial inflatable sign (X6) | −1.326 | 0.749 | 3.129 | 0.266 | 0.061–1.154 | 0.077 | |
| Burr sign (X7) | −2.042 | 0.764 | 7.143 | 0.130 | 0.029–0.580 | 0.008 | |
| Lobulation sign (X8) | −1.713 | 0.672 | 6.495 | 0.180 | 0.048–0.673 | 0.011 | |
| Constant | −20.009 | – | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.999 |
CT, computed tomography.
Figure 1.Logistic regression analysis of malignant probability and nodule size in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients.
Figure 2.Logistic regression analysis of the percentage of malignant and solid nodules in stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients.
The sensitivity and specificity of CT imaging risk factors in the diagnosis of stage I lung adenocarcinoma in the predictive model.
| 95% CI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test result variables | Area under the curve | SE[ | Asymptotic sig[ | Lower bound | Upper bound | Sensitivity | 1-Sensitivity | Youden index |
| Nodular site (X3) | 0.678 | 0.067 | 0.015 | 0.545 | 0.810 | 0.663 | 0.316 | 0.347 |
| Nodule type (X4) | 0.821 | 0.063 | 0.001 | 0.697 | 0.945 | 0.926 | 0.316 | 0.611 |
| Nodule size (X5) | 0.702 | 0.063 | 0.006 | 0.579 | 0.825 | 0.800 | 0.474 | 0.326 |
| Spicule sign (X7) | 0.600 | 0.069 | 0.170 | 0.465 | 0.735 | 0.463 | 0.263 | 0.200 |
| Lobulation sign (X8) | 0.616 | 0.064 | 0.112 | 0.490 | 0.742 | 0.337 | 0.105 | 0.232 |
The test result variables: predicted probability, predicted.
Under the non-parament assumption
null hypathesis: true area, 0.5. CT, computed tomography.
Figure 3.ROC curve of different CT imaging risk factors to stage I lung adenocarcinoma in the predictive model. CT, computed tomography.