Literature DB >> 30013613

Vasa praevia: Should we routinely screen high-risk women for this rare but serious condition?

Victoria McQueen1, Michelle Speed2, Susan Rutter2, Thomas Gray1.   

Abstract

Vasa praevia is described as the unprotected fetal vessels traversing through the placental membranes over the cervical os, below the fetal presenting part and unprotected by placental tissue or the umbilical cord. It is often not detected antenatally and presents with painless bleeding and rapid fetal compromise after spontaneous or artificial rupture of the membranes, which causes trauma to these vessels. It is a rare condition affecting one in 2500 pregnancies and has a reported perinatal mortality rate of up to 60%. More than 80% of cases of vasa praevia have at least one risk factor for the condition and it has been shown that identification of vasa praevia antenatally results in fetal survival rates of up to 97%. Risk factors include placenta praevia, velamentous cord insertion, bi-lobed placenta, succenturiate lobe, assisted reproduction and multiple pregnancy. Screening for vasa praevia with transvaginal ultrasound has been shown to be sensitive and cost effective when used in a targeted population where risk factors are present. Here, we present the antenatal assessment and management of a case of vasa praevia detected during the routine 20-week anatomy scan of a healthy primigravida, which resulted in elective caesarean section delivery of a healthy baby at 36 weeks' gestation. The pathophysiology of vasa praevia is discussed and the methods and role of screening for this rare but serious condition are appraised.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vasa praevia; obstetrics; placenta praevia; ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 30013613      PMCID: PMC6042306          DOI: 10.1177/1742271X17747137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound        ISSN: 1742-271X


  10 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of vasa praevia.

Authors:  Yinka Oyelese; Reena C Jha; Michael D Moxley; Joseph V Collea; John T Queenan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Vasa praevia.

Authors:  G M EVANS
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1952-12-06

3.  Vasa praevia: improved diagnosis through recognition of risk factors.

Authors:  R M Silver
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 4.  Poor perinatal outcome associated with vasa previa: is it preventable? A report of three cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  T Y Fung; T K Lau
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Prenatally Diagnosed Vasa Previa: A Single-Institution Series of 96 Cases.

Authors:  Val Catanzarite; Larry Cousins; Sean Daneshmand; Wade Schwendemann; Holly Casele; Joanna Adamczak; Tevy Tith; Ami Patel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Incidence of and risk indicators for vasa praevia: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Ruiter; N Kok; J Limpens; J B Derks; I M de Graaf; Bwj Mol; E Pajkrt
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of vasa previa: ultrasound findings and obstetric outcome in ten cases.

Authors:  V Catanzarite; C Maida; W Thomas; A Mendoza; L Stanco; K M Piacquadio
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Vasa previa evaluated by noncontrast time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Naoyuki Iwahashi; Nami Ota; Michihisa Shiro; Shigetaka Yagi; Sawako Minami; Kazuhiko Ino
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.705

9.  The cost-effectiveness of targeted or universal screening for vasa praevia at 18-20 weeks of gestation in Ontario.

Authors:  L E Cipriano; W H Barth; G S Zaric
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 10.  Guidelines for the management of vasa previa.

Authors:  Robert Gagnon
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2009-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.