| Literature DB >> 30013554 |
Katja J Jarick1,2, Zeinab Mokhtari1, Lukas Scheller1,2, Julia Hartweg1,2, Sina Thusek1, Duc-Dung Le1, Maria Ranecky1,2, Haroon Shaikh1,2, Musga Qureischi1,2, Katrin G Heinze3, Andreas Beilhack1,2,4.
Abstract
The regulation of immune cell migration throughout the body is essential to warrant immunosurveillance and to maintain immune homeostasis. Marking and tracking of these cells has proven important to study mechanisms of immune cell trafficking and cell interaction in vivo. Photoconversion is a well-suited technique for intravital application because it enables contactless time- and location-specific marking of cells in the tissue without surgically manipulating the microenvironment of the cells in question. However, in dividing cells the converted fluorescent protein may decline quickly. Here, we provide a detailed description of the photoconversion technique and its applicability to tracking highly proliferating T cells from the priming site of T cell activation to peripheral target organs of effector function in a preclinical model. Dendra2+ T cells were photoconverted in the Peyer's patches during the initiation phase of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and tracked through the mesenteric lymph nodes and the peripheral blood to the small intestine with flow cytometry and intravital two-photon microscopy. Photoconverted alloreactive T cells preserved the full proliferative capacity, homing, and migration of alloreactive T cells in the intestinal lamina propria. We conclusively proved that photoconversion of highly proliferative alloreactive T cells in the Peyer's patches is an effective tool to study trafficking of alloreactive T cells under physiologic conditions and to GvHD target tissues. This technique can also be applied to the study of immune cell tracking under inflammatory and non-inflammatory conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Dendra2; Peyer’s patch; T cell migration; acute graft-versus-host disease; in vivo cell tracking; lymphocyte homing; mouse models; photoconversion
Year: 2018 PMID: 30013554 PMCID: PMC6036264 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Materials used for the photoconversion and associated techniques.
| Material | Catalog # | Company |
|---|---|---|
| Transplantation | ||
| DPBS without Ca2+/Mg2+ | P04-36500 | Pan Biotech |
| Cell counting chamber (Neubauer) | ZK03 | Hartenstein |
| T cell enrichment kit (CD11b−, CD16/32−, CD45R−, and Ter-119−, Dynabeads Untouched Mouse T cells Kit) | 11413D | Thermo Fisher |
| Trypan blue solution | ||
| Enrichment buffer | ||
| Anesthetic solution | ||
| Photoconversion operation | ||
| Eye ointment (Bepanthen®) | Bayer | |
| 1 ml syringe 26GA × 3/8″ (0.45 mm × 10 mm), BD Plastipak™ | 300015 | Becton Dickinson |
| 1 ml insulin syringe 30Gx × 1/2″ (0.3 mm × 12 mm), Omnican® 100 | 9151141 | Braun |
| Analgetic (Novalgin®) | Sanofi | |
| Pasteur pipettes | 2600111 | NeoLab |
| Sterile razors | 704028 | Body products, Relax Pharma u. Kosmetik GmbH |
| Sterile dissecting swab (Setpack® size 2) | 12780 | Lohmann & Rauscher |
| Sterile gauze swab (Gazin® 5 cm × 5 cm) | 13695 | Lohmann & Rauscher |
| Sterile cotton swab (Rotilabo®) | EH12.1 | Carl Roth |
| OP towel | 800430 | BARRIER, Mölnlicke healthcare |
| 70% ethanol | T931.3 | Carl Roth |
| Quickpad® 70% 2-propanol | Holtsch Medizinprodukte GmbH | |
| Povidone iodine (Braunol® 7.5% solution) | 3864065 | BRAUN |
| Suture, 6-0 with beveled needle | V301G | Ethicon |
| Cell isolation | ||
| Sterile scalpel blades, feather #10 | BB510 | B. Braun |
| Disposable serological pipettes | 760180, 607180, 606180 | Greiner Bio-one |
| Accu-jet® pro | 26300 | Brandt |
| Micropipettes | 042760930, 642752433, 942741768, 342733754, 042720454, 942711302 | VWR |
| Cell strainer, 70 µm EASYstrainer™ | 542070 | Greiner Bio-one |
| Tube 50 ml | 227261 | Greiner Bio-one |
| Microtubes 1.5 ml | 72.706 | Sarstedt |
| 5 ml syringe BD Discardit™ II | Becton Dickinson | |
| Cell strainer, 100 µm (MACS® Smart Strainers) | 130-110-917 | Miltenyi Biotec |
| Erythrocyte lysis buffer | ||
| Dissociation buffer | ||
| Proliferation assay | ||
| RPMI Medium1640 | 21875-034 | Gibco® |
| Penicillin, streptomycin (PenStrep) | 15140-122 | Gibco® |
| 25030081 | Gibco® | |
| Fetal bovine serum | 10270-106 | Gibco® |
| Proliferation tracking dye (cell trace violet) | 34557 | Life Technologies |
| Anti-CD3 antibody (145-2C11) | 553058 | BD Pharmingen™ |
| Recombinant human IL-2 | 589106 | BioLegend |
| Flow cytometry | ||
| U-bottom 96-well plate | 83.3922.500 | Sarstedt |
| Anti-CD4 antibody (RM4-5) coupled to APC-Cy7 | 100526 | BioLegend |
| Anti-CD8 antibody (53-6.7) coupled to PE-Cy7 | 100722 | BioLegend |
| Viability dye (Zombie aqua) | 423101 | BioLegend |
| Cytotoxicity assay | ||
| Black 96-well plate | 6005182 | PerkinElmer |
| D-Luciferin, firefly, potassium salt | L8220 | BioSynth |
| Sodium pyruvate, 100 mM, 100× | 11360-039 | Gibco® |
| X-ray irradiation source | CP-160 | Faxitron |
| Surgery tools: 2 fine forceps, 1 pair of small scissors, 1 flexible needle holder, 1 needle holder | Karl Hammacher GmbH and megro | |
| 2 heating mats (20 cm × 30 cm) | 76085 | Trixie Heimtierbedarf GmbH |
| UV protection glasses | F18P1L051001 | Laservision |
| High-power UV LED lamp, fiber-coupled | Silver LED-405 nm | Prizmatix |
| Powermeter PM100 | discontinued | Thorlabs |
| Glass fiber, 1,500 µm, NA = 0.5 | Prizmatix | |
| Collimator, 405 nm, | F671SMA-405 | THORLABS |
| Laboratory stand with bosshead and ring clamp | VWR | |
| Infrared lamp | BF 27 | Beurer |
| Thermometer (dual thermo max/min) | E609790 | Amarell Electronic |
| Centrifuge (Megafuge 40R) | Thermo Scientific | |
| Laminar flow hood Hera safe | KS 18 | Thermo Scientific |
| CO2 incubators | 150i | Thermo Scientific |
| Water bath | WNB 14 | Memmert |
| FACS Canto II equipped with 405, 488, and 633 nm lasers and a high-throughput sampler (HTS) | Becton Dickinson | |
| Filter sets for FACS 488 channel: 735 LP + 780/60, 655LP + 760LP, 610LP, 556LP + 585/42, 520LP + 530/30, 488/10; 405 channel: 502 LP + 510/50, 450/50; 633 laser: 735LP + 780/60, 685LP, 660/20 | ||
| TrimScope II equipped with a titanium sapphire laser (Chameleon Ultra II, Coherent), beam splitters at 500, 570, and 655 nm, bandpass filters 420/50, 535/50, 605/70, and three photomultipliers | Lavision Biotec | |
| IVIS Spectrum | 124262 | PerkinElmer |
| FlowJo | Version X | TreeStar |
| Imaris | Versions 7.7.2 and 8 | Bitplane |
| Living image® | Version 4.0 | PerkinElmer |
| Matlab | Version R2016a | Mathworks |
| B6;129S- | 018397 | Jackson Laboratories |
| BALB/c (BALB/cAnNCrl) | Strain Code 028 | Charles River |
| C57BL/6 (C57BL/6NCrl) | Strain Code 027 | Charles River |
Materials listed once may be required also for other techniques explained.
Figure 1Procedure of Peyer’s patch photoconversion. (A) Time line of transplantation and photoconversion procedure. BALB/c recipients were maeloablatively irradiated (8 Gy) and transplanted with wild type bone marrow and Dendra2+ T cells. Donor T cells were photoconverted in the Peyer’s patches 4 days after transplantation. (B) Photograph of an externalized Peyer’s patch placed on a PBS-soaked sterile gauze. Cecum, colon, peritoneal opening, and small intestine are circled with black lines. (C) Application of a tinfoil stencil to expose a Peyer’s patch to UV light illumination using a high-power LED coupled to a glass fiber. (D) The duodenum (a) and the stomach-proximal part of the jejunum (b) were not externalized when photoconverting the six distal Peyer’s patches closest to the cecum. After photoconversion, (1) the proximal jejunum has to be placed cranial to the cecum. Subsequently, (2) the ileum (d) is placed opposite of the cecum, after which (3) the distal jejunum (c) is placed ventral of the ileum. Finally, the cecum is placed back at the location where it laid on the gauze.
Figure 2Efficiency of Dendra2+ donor cell photoconversion in the Peyer’s patches. (A) Output power of LED lamp as measured by power meter. The plot shows total output (without stencil) and applied power on Peyer’s patch (with stencil). (B) Photoconversion efficiency of donor T cells in the Peyer’s patch. Before photoconversion, 0% of the cells contained red protein, after photoconversion, 89% (mean) of the cells were red. (C) Representative FACS plots of donor cells isolated from the Peyer’s patches, mesenteric lymph nodes, peripheral blood, and the small intestine before and right after photoconversion. Peyer’s patches contain a clear photoconverted population after photoconversion, whereas all other organs contain unconverted cells at this time point.
Figure 3Photoconversion does not impact the proliferative capacity of Dendra2+ T cells. (A,B) Converted (red), unconverted (green), and mixed (yellow) cells proliferate equally well (non-parametric unpaired test, Mann–Whitney). (C) Flow-cytometric signal of the photoconverted protein plotted against the proliferation dye. Each cell division leads to a 50% reduction of fluorescence intensity of the photoconverted fluorescent protein Dendra2-red. (D) Comparison of CD4 and CD8 cell proliferation upon polyclonal activation of photoconverted Dendra2+ T cells. More rapidly dividing CD8 T cells lose faster their fluorescent cell trace violet (CTV) signal because they proliferate more than the CD4 T cells under this in vitro condition. (E) CD44 expression as a marker of T cell activation before and after stimulation. CD44 levels are comparable in photoconverted cells (red) versus not photoconverted cells (green). All exp: (n = 3 mice).
Figure 4Time course of T cell homing from Peyer’s patches through the mesenteric lymph nodes and the blood to the small intestine. (A) Peyer’s patches contain high percentages of photoconverted cells within the 24 h period observed. (B) Single cells enter the mesenteric lymph nodes during the photoconversion procedure, and low numbers populate the mesenteric lymph nodes as early as 4 h after photoconversion. 24 h after photoconversion, on average 5.7% of donor cells are from the photoconverted Peyer’s patches. (C) First photoconverted cells appear in the blood after 4 h and increase to an average of 0.78% (range: 0.04–1.41%) 24 h after photoconversion. (D) Cells were readily detected in the intestine 24 h after photoconversion. In some mice, single red cells show up in the intestinal sample, presumably due to contamination. One data point represents one mouse. Statistics are according to an unpaired non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Figure 5Photoconverted T cells migrate physiologically in the target organ small intestine. (A) Representative tracks of green and red Dendra2+ T cells in the lamina propria of the small intestine, a graft-versus-host disease target organ. Data were collected with intravital two-photon microscopy. (B) Similar migration speed as a basic measure of motility and (C) similar turning angles as a basic measure of directionality (both Student’s t-test: ns) in green and red cells in the lamina propria (n = 266 green and 419 red cells). (D) Cytotoxicity assay measuring Luciferase activity of target BALB/c tumor cells. Allogenically stimulated Dendra2+ cells were photoconverted or not and then co-incubated with target cells for 6 h. Red and green cells lysed to a similar extend (n = 3, Dunn’s multiple comparisons test: ns).
Troubleshooting guide.
| Step | Problem | Possible reason | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anesthesia | Mice react to footpad pinching | Anesthesia underdosed | Slowly add small doses of anesthetic intravenously until desired anesthetic depth is achieved |
| Mice take longer than 1 h to recover from anesthesia | Anesthesia overdosed | Do not use more anesthesia than needed to reach desired anesthetic depth | |
| Low body temperature | Monitor the body temperature with a rectal probe. Place the animal on a heating pad during anesthesia recovery | ||
| Lethality up to 24 h after operation despite recovery from anesthesia | Postoperative ileus (a postoperative ileus can be detected by widened bowel loops becoming apparent through the ventral skin of the mouse) | Rough handling of the bowel | Handle bowels gently and with care. Use pre-wetted cotton swabs to handle the bowels. Refrain from pinching the bowel with forceps. Do not apply pressure or tension to the bowel. Keep bowels lubricated at all times |
| Bowels were not placed back into the peritoneal cavity in the right organization | Follow Figure | ||
| Peritonitis | Too intensive light exposure leading to necrosis which in turn leads to intestinal perforation | Reduce UV illumination intensity or exposure time to UV illumination. Carefully lubricate the tissue to avoid heat development | |
| Introduction of infectious agents during the operation procedure | Work aseptically according to ( | ||
| Introduction of infectious agents after wound closure | Suture both the peritoneum and the skin sufficiently | ||
| Cell detection | Only dead cells are detected in flow cytometry | Contaminating digestive enzymes or intestinal contents in the cell suspension after isolation | Wash the pellets of isolated cells with PBS one or two times after obtaining single-cell suspension |
| Too intensive light exposure leading to apoptosis and necrosis | Reduce UV illumination intensity or exposure time of UV illumination. Carefully lubricate the tissue to avoid heat development | ||
| No converted protein signal can be detected | Insufficient UV light exposure for photoconversion | Increase duration and/or intensity of UV illumination | |
| Incorrect wavelength of converting light | The Dendra2 protein converts optimally with 405 nm wavelength illumination | ||
| Insufficient excitation of red protein form | Use a flow cytometer equipped with a 561 nm laser | ||
| Increase the sensitivity of the PMT detecting the red fluorescent signal | |||
| Photoconverted protein diluted out by proliferation | Measure at earlier time points after photoconversion | ||
| Converted cells are detected in the intestine 0 h after photoconversion | Photoconversion is not confined to the Peyer’s patches | Reduce the size of the tin foil stencil | |
| Peyer’s patch tissue is included in small intestinal sample | Note down the position of converted patches during the conversion procedure. Carefully remove all Peyer’s patches from the intestine before tissue digestion | ||
| Discard the tissue closely surrounding the Peyer’s patches | |||