Literature DB >> 30012854

CARs versus BiTEs: A Comparison between T Cell-Redirection Strategies for Cancer Treatment.

Clare Y Slaney1,2, Pin Wang3, Phillip K Darcy4,2, Michael H Kershaw1,2.   

Abstract

The redirection of T cells against tumors holds much promise for the treatment of cancer. Two main approaches for T-cell redirection involve their genetic modification with chimeric antigen receptors (CAR), or the use of recombinant proteins designated bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE). These approaches have demonstrated dramatic effects in patients with hematologic cancers, although limited effect against solid cancers. Here, we review and compare the successes and challenges of these two types of immunotherapies, with special focus on their mechanisms, and discuss strategies to improve their efficacy against cancer.Significance: CAR and BiTE cancer therapies have generated much excitement, but although the therapies are potentially competitive, information directly comparing the two is difficult to obtain. Here, we present the fundamentals of each approach and compare the range and level of functions they can elicit from T cells, and their efficacy against cancers. Cancer Discov; 8(8); 924-34. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30012854     DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Discov        ISSN: 2159-8274            Impact factor:   39.397


  70 in total

1.  Chemically Programmable and Switchable CAR-T Therapy.

Authors:  Junpeng Qi; Kohei Tsuji; David Hymel; Terrence R Burke; Michael Hudecek; Christoph Rader; Haiyong Peng
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  CAR T cells better than BiTEs.

Authors:  John C Molina; Nirali N Shah
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-01-26

3.  Melanoma cells can be eliminated by sialylated CD43 × CD3 bispecific T cell engager formats in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  G de Jong; L Bartels; M Kedde; E M E Verdegaal; M A Gillissen; S E Levie; M G Cercel; S E van Hal-van Veen; C Fatmawati; D van de Berg; E Yasuda; Y B Claassen; A Q Bakker; S H van der Burg; R Schotte; J Villaudy; H Spits; M D Hazenberg; P M van Helden; K Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 6.968

Review 4.  Bispecific antibodies in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Christoph Rader
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 5.  Immunotherapeutic approaches for small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wade T Iams; Jason Porter; Leora Horn
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Comparative analysis of assays to measure CAR T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Stefan Kiesgen; John C Messinger; Navin K Chintala; Zachary Tano; Prasad S Adusumilli
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 7.  Immunotherapies Old and New: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant, Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells, and Bispecific Antibodies for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma.

Authors:  Anupama Doraiswamy; Mansi R Shah; Rajat Bannerji
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 8.  T cell-engaging therapies - BiTEs and beyond.

Authors:  Maria-Elisabeth Goebeler; Ralf C Bargou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Bispecific T-Cell Redirection versus Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T Cells as Approaches to Kill Cancer Cells.

Authors:  William R Strohl; Michael Naso
Journal:  Antibodies (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-03

Review 10.  Enhancing Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Efficacy in Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Giovanni Fucà; Loic Reppel; Elisa Landoni; Barbara Savoldo; Gianpietro Dotti
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.