| Literature DB >> 30011944 |
Mi Kyung Kim1, Sungwoo Lee2, Inug Yoon3, Geon Kook4, Yeon Su Jung5, Sarah S M Bawazir6, Cesare Stefanini7, Hyunjoo J Lee8.
Abstract
Chronic monitoring of bladder activity and urine volume is essential for patients suffering from urinary dysfunctions. However, due to the anatomy and dynamics of the bladder, chronic and precise monitoring of bladder activity remains a challenge. Here, we propose a new sensing mechanism that measures the bladder volume using a resistive ladder network with contact switches. Instead of measuring the impedance between the electrode continuously, the proposed sensor provides a digitized output ('on' or 'off') when the bladder volume reaches a certain threshold value. We present simple proof-of-concept sensors which compare the discrete-mode operation to the continuous-mode operation. In addition, by using multiple pairs of this contact-mode switch in a resistor ladder structure, we demonstrate monitoring of the bladder volume in four discrete steps using an idealized balloon and an ex vivo pig's bladder. We implemented the resistive ladder network using a conductive polypyrrole/agarose hydrogel composite which exhibits a Young's modulus comparable to that of the bladder wall. Compared to the continuous-mode operation, the proposed sensing mechanism is less susceptible to drift due to material degradation and environmental factors.Entities:
Keywords: bladder monitoring; bladder volume; resistor structure; small strain; switch contact mode
Year: 2018 PMID: 30011944 PMCID: PMC6069483 DOI: 10.3390/s18072288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Operational principle of proposed ladder switch sensor. (a) Schematics of the contact-mode sensor with four pairs of electrodes before and after the distension; (b) Schematic illustration of resistance change of continuous strain sensor and discrete contact-mode of a single pair of electrodes over time; (c) Simulation results of a sensor composed of four pairs of electrodes showing the overall sensor resistance over increasing stress.
Figure 2(a) Fabrication process of the sensor based on a polypyrrole/agarose hydrogel composite; Optical pictures of (b) the solution casting process; (c) the released sensor interfaced with wires; and (d) the fabricated sensor placed on a balloon; (e) Cross-section scheme of the sensor on the bladder.
Figure 3Schematics of the experimental set-up of inflation and deflation of the balloon and bladder, accompanied with volume measurement.
Figure 4Sensor performance of continuous strain sensor and contact-mode sensor. (a) Measured fractional resistance change of the continuous strain sensor over 1000 cycles (inset: optical picture of the proof-of-concept continuous strain sensor composed of CNT/PDMS composite); (b) Measured fractional resistance change of the contact-mode sensor over 1000 cycles (inset: optical picture of proof-of-concept contact-mode sensor with one pair of electrodes; (c) Normalized initial resistance, R0, of two proof-of-concept sensors over 2000 stretching cycles.
Figure 5Finite element simulation results of the sensor operation. (a) Stress imposed on the bladder by the sensor with different Young’s modulus; (b) Maximum gap distance between two electrodes to form an electric contact when the volume changes from 800 mL to 400 mL.
Figure 6Material properties of the contact-mode sensor. (a) Optical pictures of the polypyrrole/agarose hydrogel block with different concentrations of pyrrole; (b) Normalized resistance of polypyrrole/agarose hydrogel composite over different elongation lengths; (c) Stress measurement of a 1-mm-thick polypyrrole/agarose hydrogel composite with different pyrrole concentrations over different strain values; (d) Measured conductivity and Young’s modulus over different concentrations of pyrrole.
Figure 7Demonstration of sensor operation on the balloon and ex vivo pig’s bladder: (a) Photo of the sensor attached to an ideal balloon and the zoomed-in photos of the sensors in all-open and all-closed states; (b) Absolute differentiated value of the sensor attached to a balloon; (c) Photo of the sensor attached to an ex vivo pig’s bladder and the zoomed-in photos of the sensors in all-open and all-closed states; (d) Absolute differentiated value of the sensor attached to an ex vivo pig’s bladder.