| Literature DB >> 30011840 |
Yun-Hui Si1, Yu Xia2, Shao-Ke Shang3, Xin-Bo Xiong4, Xie-Rong Zeng5, Ji Zhou6, Ya-Yun Li7.
Abstract
BiFeO₃/Reduced Graphene Oxide (BFO/RGO) composites have been fabricated by a simple hydrothermal method. The X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Raman, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis reveal that graphene oxide was reduced in hydrothermal process and BFO/RGO composites were successfully synthesized. UV-visible absorption and photoluminescence properties show that the introduction of RGO can effectively reduce the recombination of photogenerated electron and hole pairs. Compared to the pristine BFO, the photocatalytic performance of BiFeO₃ Graphene Oxide (BGO) composites is enhanced for the degradation of Methylene blue (MB) solution under visible light irradiation, and the result shows that the optimal amount of Graphene Oxide (GO) in the composites is 60 mg (BGO60). The excellent photocatalytic performance is mainly ascribed to improved light absorption, increased reactive sites, and the low recombination rate of electron-hole pairs. This work can provide more insights into designing advanced photocatalysts for wastewater treatment and environmental protection.Entities:
Keywords: BiFeO3; photocatalytic; reduced graphene oxide; visible light
Year: 2018 PMID: 30011840 PMCID: PMC6071018 DOI: 10.3390/nano8070526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Graphene Oxide (GO), bismuth ferrite (BFO) and BiFeO3 Graphene Oxide (BGO) composites.
Figure 2Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of (a) BFO; (b) BGO10; (c) BGO30; (d) BGO60; (e) BGO 100; (f) BGO150.
Figure 3The magnification of (a) BGO60 composite; energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) spectrum of BGO60; (b) Area 1; (c) Area 2.
Figure 4Raman spectra of BFO and BGO60. Inset shows D band and G band of BGO60 and GO.
Figure 5Full survey spectrum of BGO60.
Figure 6The high resolution spectrum of (a) O 1s for BFO; (b) Fe 2p for BFO; (c) O 1s for BGO60; (d) Fe 2p for BGO60; (e) C 1s for GO; (f) C 1s for BGO60.
Figure 7UV-visible absorption spectra of BFO and BGO samples. The inset shows the calculation of band gap.
Figure 8Photoluminescence spectroscopy of BFO and BGO samples.
Figure 9(a) Photocatalytic degradation efficiencies of methylene blue (MB) as a function of irradiation time under visible light for BFO and BGO samples; (b) Stability test of photocatalytic degradation of MB by BGO60 under visible light irradiation.