Literature DB >> 30010971

Treatment-based Classification System for Patients With Low Back Pain: The Movement Control Approach.

Muhammad Alrwaily1,2, Michael Timko1,3, Michael Schneider3, Greg Kawchuk4, Christopher Bise3, Karthik Hariharan3, Joel Stevans3, Anthony Delitto5.   

Abstract

We present the movement control approach as part of the treatment-based classification system. This approach proposes a movement control schema that clarifies that movement control is a product of the interplay among multiple biopsychosocial components. The schema illustrates that for movement to occur in a dynamically controlled fashion, the lumbar spine requires both local mobility and global stability. Local mobility means that the lumbar spine and its adjacent regions possess adequate nerve and joint(s) mobility and soft tissue compliance (ie, the malleability of tissue to undergo elastic deformation). Global stability means that the muscles of the lumbar spine and its adjacent regions can generate activation that is coordinated with various joint movements and incorporated into activities of daily living. Local mobility and global stability are housed within the bio-behavioral and socio-occupational factors that should be addressed during movement rehabilitation. This schema is converted into a practical physical examination to help the rehabilitation provider to construct a clinical rationale as to why the movement impairment(s) exist. The examination findings are used to guide treatment. We suggest a treatment prioritization that aims to consecutively address neural sensitivity, joint(s) and soft tissue mobility, motor control, and endurance. This prioritization enables rehabilitation providers to better plan the intervention according to each patient's needs. We emphasize that treatment for patients with low back pain is not a static process. Rather, the treatment is a fluid process that changes as the clinical status of the patient changes. This movement control approach is based on clinical experience and indirect evidence; further research is needed to support its clinical utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 30010971     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzx087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  5 in total

1.  The evolution of manual therapy education: what are we waiting for?

Authors:  William H Kolb; Amy Wallace McDevitt; Jodi Young; Eric Shamus
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2020-02

2.  Beyond the pain: A qualitative study exploring the physical therapy experience in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Christopher Joyce; Julie Keysor; Joel Stevans; Kelley Ready; Eric J Roseen; Robert B Saper
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Performance on a Motor Control Test in an Asymptomatic Adolescent Population.

Authors:  Kari Lindegren; Kristin Bastian; Christopher Kovacs; Robyn McHugh; Catherine Quatman-Yates; Mark Paterno
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-02-01

4.  Derivation of clinical prediction rules for identifying patients with non-acute low back pain who respond best to a lumbar stabilization exercise program at post-treatment and six-month follow-up.

Authors:  Christian Larivière; Khalil Rabhi; Richard Preuss; Marie-France Coutu; Nicolas Roy; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Tuina for low back pain: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyong Fan; Qiang Tian; Rusong Guo; Yu Zhang; Shan Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.