María E Santolaya1,2, Ana M Alvarez2,3, Mirta Acuña2,4, Carmen L Avilés2,5, Carmen Salgado2,6, Juan Tordecilla2,4, Mónica Varas2,3, Marcela Venegas2,5, Milena Villarroel1,2, Marcela Zubieta2,6, Mauricio Farfán7, Verónica de la Maza1, Alejandra Vergara7, Romina Valenzuela1, Juan P Torres1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 2. Committee of Infectious Diseases, National Child Programme of Antineoplastic Drugs (PINDA), Santiago, Chile. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Dr. Roberto del Río, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 5. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital San Borja Arriarán, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Dr. Exequiel González Cortés, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. 7. Center for Molecular Studies, Hospital Dr. Luis Calvo Mackenna, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of pre-emptive versus empirical antifungal therapy in children with cancer, fever and neutropenia. Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, randomized clinical trial. Children presenting with persistent high-risk febrile neutropenia at five hospitals in Santiago, Chile, were randomized to empirical or pre-emptive antifungal therapy. The pre-emptive group received antifungal therapy only if the persistent high-risk febrile neutropenia was accompanied by clinical, laboratory, imaging or microbiological pre-defined criteria. The primary endpoint was overall mortality at day 30 of follow-up. Secondary endpoints included invasive fungal disease (IFD)-related mortality, number of days of fever, days of hospitalization and use of antifungal drugs, percentage of children developing IFD, requiring modification of initial treatment strategy and need for ICU. The trial was registered with Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC) under trial number RBR-3m9d74. Results: A total of 149 children were randomized, 73 to empirical therapy and 76 to pre-emptive therapy. Thirty-two out of 76 (42%) children in the pre-emptive group received antifungal therapy. The median duration of antifungal therapy was 11 days in the empirical arm and 6 days in the pre-emptive arm (P < 0.001), with similar overall mortality (8% in the empirical arm and 5% in the pre-emptive arm, P = 0.47). IFD-related mortality was the same in both groups (3%, P = 0.97), as were the percentage of children with IFD (12%, P = 0.92) and the number of days of fever (9, P = 0.76). The number of days of hospitalization was 19 in the empirical arm and 17 in the pre-emptive arm (P = 0.15) and the need for ICU was 25% in the empirical arm and 20% in the pre-emptive arm (P = 0.47). Conclusions: Pre-emptive antifungal therapy was as effective as empirical antifungal therapy in children with cancer, fever and neutropenia, significantly reducing the use of antifungal drugs.
RCT Entities:
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of pre-emptive versus empirical antifungal therapy in children with cancer, fever and neutropenia. Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, randomized clinical trial. Children presenting with persistent high-risk febrile neutropenia at five hospitals in Santiago, Chile, were randomized to empirical or pre-emptive antifungal therapy. The pre-emptive group received antifungal therapy only if the persistent high-risk febrile neutropenia was accompanied by clinical, laboratory, imaging or microbiological pre-defined criteria. The primary endpoint was overall mortality at day 30 of follow-up. Secondary endpoints included invasive fungal disease (IFD)-related mortality, number of days of fever, days of hospitalization and use of antifungal drugs, percentage of children developing IFD, requiring modification of initial treatment strategy and need for ICU. The trial was registered with Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC) under trial number RBR-3m9d74. Results: A total of 149 children were randomized, 73 to empirical therapy and 76 to pre-emptive therapy. Thirty-two out of 76 (42%) children in the pre-emptive group received antifungal therapy. The median duration of antifungal therapy was 11 days in the empirical arm and 6 days in the pre-emptive arm (P < 0.001), with similar overall mortality (8% in the empirical arm and 5% in the pre-emptive arm, P = 0.47). IFD-related mortality was the same in both groups (3%, P = 0.97), as were the percentage of children with IFD (12%, P = 0.92) and the number of days of fever (9, P = 0.76). The number of days of hospitalization was 19 in the empirical arm and 17 in the pre-emptive arm (P = 0.15) and the need for ICU was 25% in the empirical arm and 20% in the pre-emptive arm (P = 0.47). Conclusions: Pre-emptive antifungal therapy was as effective as empirical antifungal therapy in children with cancer, fever and neutropenia, significantly reducing the use of antifungal drugs.