Literature DB >> 30009701

Calcium Channel Blockers in Restoration of Endothelial Function: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Miroslav Radenković1, Marko Stojanović1, Milica Prostran1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical evaluation of the Endothelial Function (EF) is becoming an essential step in the quality assessment of cardiovascular risk prevention and rational pharmacotherapy of cardiovascular disorders. The existing pieces of evidence suggested that Calcium Channel Blockers (CCB) can induce positive effects on impaired EF.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of CCB on EF, we performed a meta-analysis of available data from randomized and placebo-controlled or other treatment-controlled clinical studies encompassing effects of CCB on EF, as measured by Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery.
METHODS: The relevant clinical studies were searched by systematic exploration of the appropriate databases until November 30, 2017. A random-effect model was conducted. The primary outcome was the percentage change in FMD between the baseline and the final levels in response to investigated drugs.
RESULTS: Fifteen randomized clinical studies with 33 arms were identified. CCB improved FMD more pronounced than thiazide diuretics - TD (3 studies, 157 participants, WMD=2.08%, 95% CI=0.35-3.80%; P=0.02). Oppositely, ACE Inhibitors (ACEI) and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARB) notably improved FMD if compared to CCB (CCB vs. ACEI: 5 studies, 533 participants, WMD = -1.62%, 95% CI = -2.74% to -0.50%; P=0.005; and CCB vs. ARB: 9 studies, 669 participants, WMD = -1.52%, 95% CI = -2.22% to -0.81%; P=0.0001). CCB effects on EF were similar to those evoked by beta blockers or placebo.
CONCLUSION: CCB improved EF to a more prominent extent only if paralleled to TD, while inversely; ACEI and ARB were more effective in augmenting FMD. Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Calcium channel blockers; cardiovascular risk prevention; endothelial dysfunction; flow-mediated dilation; meta-analysis; rational pharmacotherapy; systematiczzm321990review.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30009701     DOI: 10.2174/0929867325666180713144806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Chem        ISSN: 0929-8673            Impact factor:   4.530


  4 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Catheterization on Artery Function and Health: When Should Patients Start Exercising Following Their Coronary Intervention?

Authors:  Andrea Tryfonos; Daniel J Green; Ellen A Dawson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Clinical Implications of Endothelial Dysfunction in Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Pasquale Ambrosino; Tiziana Bachetti; Silvestro Ennio D'Anna; Brurya Galloway; Andrea Bianco; Vito D'Agnano; Antimo Papa; Andrea Motta; Fabio Perrotta; Mauro Maniscalco
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 3.  Comparative Efficacy of Antihypertensive Agents in Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of Patients with Hypertension: Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hong Ding; Shu Liu; Ke-Xin Zhao; Jie Pu; Ya-Fei Xie; Xiao-Wei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.434

4.  Regulation of the microvasculature during small muscle mass exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease vs. chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Jacob Peter Hartmann; Rasmus H Dahl; Stine Nymand; Gregers W Munch; Camilla K Ryrsø; Bente K Pedersen; Pia Thaning; Stefan P Mortensen; Ronan M G Berg; Ulrik Winning Iepsen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.755

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.