Literature DB >> 30009622

Incidence and demographics of 1751 surgically treated periprosthetic femoral fractures around a primary hip prosthesis.

Georgios Chatziagorou1,2, Hans Lindahl1,3, Göran Garellick1, Johan Kärrholm1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFF), treated surgically, have been recorded in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) since 1979. It is postulated that fractures treated with other methods other than stem revision have a lower registration rate, which may lead to incomplete registry data and thus, inaccurate information. We collected all PPFFs surgically treated in Sweden between 2001 and 2011 with the purpose of studying the annual incidence, demographics and distribution of fracture types with regard to type of fixation.
METHODS: Data was linked between the SHAR and the National Patient Register (NPR) in order to detect even those PPFFs not reported to the SHAR. Fractures were classified according to the Vancouver classification system, based on information collected from the medical charts. This procedure was validated with observer variation analysis compared to fracture classification based on radiographs. In total 1751 first-time PPFFs around primary conventional stems were included.
RESULTS: The incidence of PPFF increased from about 1.0 per 1000 primary THRs to 1.4. Vancouver type C fractures (37% of all fractures) were more common than previously reported, and more common in cemented than in uncemented stems. The 3 most common stem designs involved were Exeter polished, Lubinus SPII, and Charnley (66.3% of all stems), partly reflecting their occurrence in the Swedish THR population. DISCUSSION: The incidence of PPFFs has increased in Sweden during the period 2001 to 2011. The improved reporting of type C fractures, after data-linking, revealed an almost 4 times higher incidence compared to previous register studies in Sweden.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral; fractures; periprosthetic; total hip replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30009622     DOI: 10.1177/1120700018779558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  10 in total

1.  Comparative study of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fractures treated by internal fixation versus stem revision.

Authors:  Sagi Martinov; Sebastien D'ulisse; Edouard Haumont; Dragos Schiopu; Pieter Reynders; Tamás Illés
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Treatment Algorithm of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracturens.

Authors:  Nicola Mondanelli; Elisa Troiano; Andrea Facchini; Roberta Ghezzi; Martina Di Meglio; Nicolò Nuvoli; Giacomo Peri; Pietro Aiuto; Giovanni Battista Colasanti; Stefano Giannotti
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-10

Review 3.  Personalized Hip Joint Replacement with Large Diameter Head: Current Concepts.

Authors:  Pascal-André Vendittoli; Sagi Martinov; Mina Wahba Morcos; Sivan Sivaloganathan; William G Blakeney
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  The design of the cemented stem influences the risk of Vancouver type B fractures, but not of type C: an analysis of 82,837 Lubinus SPII and Exeter Polished stems.

Authors:  Georgios Chatziagorou; Hans Lindahl; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Combined Surgical and Medical Treatment for Vancouver B1 and C Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proposal of a Therapeutic Algorithm While Retaining the Original Stable Stem.

Authors:  Nicola Mondanelli; Elisa Troiano; Andrea Facchini; Martina Cesari; Giovanni Battista Colasanti; Vanna Bottai; Francesco Muratori; Carla Caffarelli; Stefano Gonnelli; Stefano Giannotti
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): a comparison between osteosynthesis and revision in a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gianluca Scalici; Debora Boncinelli; Luigi Zanna; Roberto Buzzi; Laura Antonucci; Fabrizio Di Maida; Pietro De Biase
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Comparison of axial-rotational postoperative periprosthetic fracture of the femur in composite osteoporotic femur versus human cadaveric specimens: A validation study.

Authors:  Jonathan N Lamb; Oliver Coltart; Isaiah Adekanmbi; Hemant G Pandit; Todd Stewart
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 1.763

8.  Risk for hip fracture before and after total knee replacement in Sweden.

Authors:  C H Vala; J Kärrholm; J A Kanis; H Johansson; S Sten; V Sundh; M Karlsson; M Lorentzon; D Mellström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures in cemented and uncemented stems according to Vancouver classification: observation of a new fracture pattern.

Authors:  James Karam; Paul Campbell; Shivang Desai; Michael Hunter
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  The race for the classification of proximal periprosthetic femoral fractures : Vancouver vs Unified Classification System (UCS) - a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Schopper; Matthias Luger; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Tobias Gotterbarm; Antonio Klasan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.