Literature DB >> 30009542

Capture enrichment of aquatic environmental DNA: A first proof of concept.

Taylor M Wilcox1,2,3, Katherine E Zarn1,2, Maxine P Piggott3, Michael K Young1, Kevin S McKelvey1, Michael K Schwartz1.   

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) sampling-the detection of genetic material in the environment to infer species presence-has rapidly grown as a tool for sampling aquatic animal communities. A potentially powerful feature of environmental sampling is that all taxa within the habitat shed DNA and so may be detectable, creating opportunity for whole-community assessments. However, animal DNA in the environment tends to be comparatively rare, making it necessary to enrich for genetic targets from focal taxa prior to sequencing. Current metabarcoding approaches for enrichment rely on bulk amplification using conserved primer annealing sites, which can result in skewed relative sequence abundance and failure to detect some taxa because of PCR bias. Here, we test capture enrichment via hybridization as an alternative strategy for target enrichment using a series of experiments on environmental samples and laboratory-generated, known-composition DNA mixtures. Capture enrichment resulted in detecting multiple species in both kinds of samples, and postcapture relative sequence abundance accurately reflected initial relative template abundance. However, further optimization is needed to permit reliable species detection at the very low-DNA quantities typical of environmental samples (<0.1 ng DNA). We estimate that our capture protocols are comparable to, but less sensitive than, current PCR-based eDNA analyses.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  capture; eDNA; environmental DNA; metabarcoding; metagenetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30009542     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  6 in total

Review 1.  Predicting the fate of eDNA in the environment and implications for studying biodiversity.

Authors:  Jori B Harrison; Jennifer M Sunday; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Performance and automation of ancient DNA capture with RNA hyRAD probes.

Authors:  Tomasz Suchan; Mariya A Kusliy; Naveed Khan; Loreleï Chauvey; Laure Tonasso-Calvière; Stéphanie Schiavinato; John Southon; Marcel Keller; Keiko Kitagawa; Johannes Krause; Alexander N Bessudnov; Alexander A Bessudnov; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Silvia Valenzuela-Lamas; Jarosław Wilczyński; Sylwia Pospuła; Krzysztof Tunia; Marek Nowak; Magdalena Moskal-delHoyo; Alexey A Tishkin; Alexander J E Pryor; Alan K Outram; Ludovic Orlando
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 8.678

Review 3.  Beyond Biodiversity: Can Environmental DNA (eDNA) Cut It as a Population Genetics Tool?

Authors:  Clare I M Adams; Michael Knapp; Neil J Gemmell; Gert-Jan Jeunen; Michael Bunce; Miles D Lamare; Helen R Taylor
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.096

Review 4.  Prospects and challenges of implementing DNA metabarcoding for high-throughput insect surveillance.

Authors:  Alexander M Piper; Jana Batovska; Noel O I Cogan; John Weiss; John Paul Cunningham; Brendan C Rodoni; Mark J Blacket
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

5.  Developing a non-destructive metabarcoding protocol for detection of pest insects in bulk trap catches.

Authors:  Jana Batovska; Alexander M Piper; Isabel Valenzuela; John Paul Cunningham; Mark J Blacket
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Monitoring spawning migrations of potamodromous fish species via eDNA.

Authors:  Bettina Thalinger; Elisabeth Wolf; Michael Traugott; Josef Wanzenböck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.