Literature DB >> 30009509

Using conservation science to advance corporate biodiversity accountability.

Prue F E Addison1, Joseph W Bull2,3, E J Milner-Gulland1.   

Abstract

Biodiversity declines threaten the sustainability of global economies and societies. Acknowledging this, businesses are beginning to make commitments to account for and mitigate their influence on biodiversity and report this in sustainability reports. We assessed the top 100 of the 2016 Fortune 500 Global companies' (the Fortune 100) sustainability reports to gauge the current state of corporate biodiversity accountability. Almost half (49) of the Fortune 100 mentioned biodiversity in reports, and 31 made clear biodiversity commitments, of which only 5 were specific, measureable, and time bound. A variety of biodiversity-related activities were disclosed (e.g., managing impacts, restoring biodiversity, and investing in biodiversity), but only 9 companies provided quantitative indicators to verify the magnitude of their activities (e.g., area of habitat restored). No companies reported quantitative biodiversity outcomes, making it difficult to determine whether business actions were of sufficient magnitude to address impacts and were achieving positive outcomes for nature. Conservation science can advance approaches to corporate biodiversity accountability by helping businesses make science-based biodiversity commitments, develop meaningful indicators, and select more targeted activities to address business impacts. With the biodiversity policy super year of 2020 rapidly approaching, now is the time for conservation scientists to engage with and support businesses in playing a critical role in setting the new agenda for a sustainable future for the planet with biodiversity at its heart.
© 2018 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  corporate social responsibility; desarrollo; development; indicadores; indicators; mitigación; mitigation; naturaleza; nature; private sector; responsabilidad social corporativa; sector privado; sustainability; sustentabilidad; 企业的社会责任; 减缓; 发展; 可持续性; 指标; 私营部门; 自然

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30009509     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  3 in total

1.  Analysis: the biodiversity footprint of the University of Oxford.

Authors:  Joseph William Bull; Isobel Taylor; Elizabeth Biggs; Henry M J Grub; Tom Yearley; Harriet Waters; E J Milner-Gulland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Flower plantings promote insect pollinator abundance and wild bee richness in Canadian agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Stephen G Van Drunen; Jessica E Linton; Gregory Kuwahara; D Ryan Norris
Journal:  J Insect Conserv       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 2.620

3.  Safeguarding marine life: conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems.

Authors:  Delphi Ward; Jessica Melbourne-Thomas; Gretta T Pecl; Karen Evans; Madeline Green; Phillipa C McCormack; Camilla Novaglio; Rowan Trebilco; Narissa Bax; Madeleine J Brasier; Emma L Cavan; Graham Edgar; Heather L Hunt; Jan Jansen; Russ Jones; Mary-Anne Lea; Reuben Makomere; Chris Mull; Jayson M Semmens; Janette Shaw; Dugald Tinch; Tatiana J van Steveninck; Cayne Layton
Journal:  Rev Fish Biol Fish       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.845

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.