Literature DB >> 3000868

The evolution of self-regulated transposition of transposable elements.

B Charlesworth, C H Langley.   

Abstract

This paper examines the conditions under which self-regulated rates of transposition can evolve in populations of transposable elements infecting sexually reproducing hosts. Models of the evolution of both cis-acting regulation (transposition immunity) and trans-acting regulation (transposition repression) are analyzed. The potential selective advantage to regulation is assumed to be derived from the deleterious effects of mutations associated with the insertion of newly replicated elements. It is shown that both types of regulation can easily evolve in hosts with low rates of genetic recombination per generation, such as bacteria or bacterial plasmids. Conditions are much more restrictive in organisms with relatively free recombination. In haploids, the main selective force promoting regulation is the induction of lethal or sterile mutations by transposition; in diploids, a sufficiently high frequency of dominant lethal or sterile mutations associated with transpositions is required. Data from Drosophila and maize suggest that this requirement can sometimes be met. Coupling of regulatory effects across different families of elements would also aid the evolution of regulation. The selective advantages of restricting transposition to the germ line and of excising elements from somatic cells are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3000868      PMCID: PMC1202706     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  25 in total

1.  On the Control of the Distribution of Meiotic Exchange in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  A T Carpenter; B S Baker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations.

Authors:  M J Simmons; J F Crow
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Inhibition of TnA translocation by TnA.

Authors:  M K Robinson; P M Bennett; M H Richmond
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  The evolutionary implications of mobile genetic elements.

Authors:  M Syvanen
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Transposon Tn1 intra-molecular transposition.

Authors:  R Bishop; D Sherratt
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1984

Review 6.  Transposable elements in prokaryotes.

Authors:  N Kleckner
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 16.830

7.  Selfish DNAs with self-restraint.

Authors:  W F Doolittle; T B Kirkwood; M A Dempster
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Feb 9-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Translational control of IS10 transposition.

Authors:  R W Simons; N Kleckner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  An approach to population and evolutionary genetic theory for genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts, and some results.

Authors:  C W Birky; T Maruyama; P Fuerst
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Some calculations on the amount of selfish DNA.

Authors:  T Ohta; M Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  68 in total

1.  Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations.

Authors:  T Johnson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Evolutionary dynamics of transposable elements in prokaryotes and eukaryotes.

Authors:  D A Hickey
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 3.  Genome Biology and the Evolution of Cell-Size Diversity.

Authors:  Rachel Lockridge Mueller
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Genomic mutation in lines of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to ultraviolet-B radiation.

Authors:  Joanna L MacKenzie; Fabienne E Saadé; Quang Hien Le; Thomas E Bureau; Daniel J Schoen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Comparison of the genome structure of the self-incompatibility (S) locus in interspecific pairs of S haplotypes.

Authors:  Ryo Fujimoto; Keiichi Okazaki; Eigo Fukai; Makoto Kusaba; Takeshi Nishio
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Population genetics models of competition between transposable element subfamilies.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Rouzic; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The fate of transposable elements in asexual populations.

Authors:  Elie S Dolgin; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Models of repression of transposition in P-M hybrid dysgenesis by P cytotype and by zygotically encoded repressor proteins.

Authors:  J F Brookfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  Applying mobile genetic elements for genome analysis and evolution.

Authors:  Wolfgang J Miller; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.695

10.  Rapid spread of transposable p elements in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  A G Good; G A Meister; H W Brock; T A Grigliatti; D A Hickey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.