| Literature DB >> 30008607 |
Toshiyuki Sakaeda1, Shinji Kobuchi1, Ryosuke Yoshioka1, Mariko Haruna1, Noriko Takahata1, Yukako Ito1, Aki Sugano2, Kazuki Fukuzawa3, Toshiki Hayase3, Taro Hayakawa4, Hideo Nakayama4, Yutaka Takaoka2, Masahiro Tohkin3.
Abstract
Objectives: In Japan, sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been reported to be associated with serious skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. A post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study suggested that the association was specific for ipragliflozin and, to a lesser extent for dapagliflozin. These studies were performed to confirm the association of 6 SGLT2 inhibitors with serious skin disorders in a clinical setting, to elucidate the role of melanin in serious skin disorders and to understand the underlying mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 (SGLT2); dapagliflozin; ipragliflozin; skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30008607 PMCID: PMC6036094 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.22224
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Adjusted reporting odds ratio of SGLT2 inhibitors for serious skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
| Drugs other than SGLT2 inhibitors | T2DM drugs other than SGLT2 inhibitors | |
|---|---|---|
| Ipragliflozin | 1.667 (1.415, 1.963) | 2.395 (2.019, 2.840) |
| Dapagliflozin | 0.514 (0.317, 0.835) | 0.703 (0.432, 1.144) |
| Tofogliflozin | 0.149 (0.048, 0.465) | 0.200 (0.064, 0.623) |
| Luseogliflozin | 0.624 (0.331, 1.177) | 0.843 (0.447, 1.592) |
| Canagliflozin | 0.590 (0.277, 1.257) | 0.792 (0.371, 1.690) |
| Empagliflozin | 0.293 (0.073, 1.187) | 0.398 (0.098, 1.617) |
The reference was drugs or T2DM drugs other than SGLT2 inhibitors.
The reporting odds ratio was adjusted by logistic regression analysis, and shown with 95% confidence limit in the parentheses.
Cluster analyses of 3-D docking results of the SGLT2 inhibitors with melanin
| Cluster | Ipragliflozin | Dapagliflozin | Tofogliflozin | Luseogliflozin | Canagliflozin | Empagliflozin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1, 2, 9 | -7.35±0.35 (26) | -6.60±0.91 (13) | -6.10±0.36 (10) | -7.36±0.30 (5) | -7.50±1.02 (36) | -6.95±0.80 (19) |
| 3, 5, 6 | -5.54±0.61 (29) | -5.58±0.51 (86) | -5.12±0.59 (3) | -5.80±0.52 (42) | -6.03±0.50 (66) | |
| 4 | -5.34±0.46 (45) | -5.31 (2) | -5.54±0.45 (52) | -5.65 (2) | ||
| 7 | -4.04 (1) | |||||
| 8 | -5.57±0.40 (85) | |||||
| 10 | -5.74 (1) | |||||
| 11 | -6.17±0.54 (64) | |||||
| 12 | -7.57±0.69 (9) | |||||
| 13 | -5.70±0.40 (4) |
The values were mean ± SD of docking score with the number of complex (cluster size) in parentheses.
Figure 1Typical docking forms in cluster 2 for melanin with SGLT2 inhibitors. Green: Melanin in the four layers of planar tetramers, purple: SGLT2 inhibitors. No docking form was suggested for empagliflozin.
SGLT2 inhibitor concentrations in skin tissue (ng/g) in rats
| 1 h | 8 h | 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipragliflozin | 151.7±53.4 | 168.2±28.7 | 90.6±38.9 |
| Dapagliflozin | 42.6±24.7 | 13.0±5.0 | ND |
| Tofogliflozin | 103.4±29.2 | 27.1±3.2 * | - a) |
| Luseogliflozin | ND | ND | ND |
| Canagliflozin | 37.0±18.5 | 82.6±22.9 | 20.1±11.6 |
The values are mean ± SD of the concentrations with their ratios to plasma concentrations in the parentheses.
* P < 0.05, compared with the data at 1hr.
ND: below the limit of detection.
a) The data included 1 or more data of ND.
b) The plasma concentration was below the limit of detection.
SGLT2 inhibitor concentrations in kidneys (ng/g) in rats
| 1 h | 8 h | 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipragliflozin | 1419.5±405.2 | 1091.1±455.8 | 301.0±86.9 * |
| Dapagliflozin | 1034.1±520.8 | 530.8±191.0 | 170.1±40.2 * |
| Tofogliflozin | 848.5±115.8 | 492.0±101.0 * | 200.8±42.9 * |
| Luseogliflozin | 94.9±74.3 | 80.1±51.7 | - a) |
| Canagliflozin | 802.7±269.2 | 1014.1±306.0 | 636.2±222.5 |
The values are mean ± SD of the concentrations with their ratios to plasma concentrations in the parentheses.
* P < 0.05, compared with the data at 1hr.
a) The data included 1 or more data of ND (below the limit of detection.).
b) The plasma concentration was below the limit of detection.
SGLT2 inhibitor concentrations in small intestine (ng/g) in rats
| 1 h | 8 h | 24 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipragliflozin | 729.5±377.2 | 347.6±104.8 | - a) |
| Dapagliflozin | 37.9±10.3 | 19.7±6.7 | ND |
| Tofogliflozin | 1356.0±512.6 | 250.1±114.5 * | - a) |
| Luseogliflozin | 250.8±178.4 | - a) | - a) |
| Canagliflozin | 2925.2±1074.2 | 440.1±117.2 * | 325.9±218.0 * |
The values are mean ± SD of the concentrations with their ratios to plasma concentrations in the parentheses.
* P < 0.05, compared with the data at 1hr.
ND: below the limit of detection.
a) The data included 1 or more data of ND.
b) The plasma concentration was below the limit of detection.