Literature DB >> 30008396

The diagnostic threshold for osteoporosis impedes fracture prevention in women at high risk for fracture: A registry-based cohort study.

William D Leslie1, Ego Seeman2, Suzanne N Morin3, Lisa M Lix4, Sumit R Majumdar5.   

Abstract

The diagnostic threshold for osteoporosis, a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤ -2.5, signals an increased risk for fracture. However, most fragility fractures arise among the majority of women with 'osteopenia' or 'normal' BMD. We hypothesized that a BMD T-score of -2.5, even if not intended as a treatment threshold, paradoxically may create disincentive to initiating treatment of women with osteopenia or normal BMD at high risk for fracture. From a population-based BMD registry covering the Province of Manitoba, Canada, we identified 3735 untreated women aged ≥ 50 years undergoing BMD screening in 2006-2015 found to qualify for Osteoporosis Canada guidelines-based treatment. The main outcome was prescription of an approved osteoporosis medications in the year after BMD testing ascertained from a population-based pharmacy database. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) for treatment initiation based on BMD, major fracture history (non-traumatic vertebral, hip or multiple fractures), age, and calendar year (to examine the impact of treatment guidelines published in 2010). Among these women, 50% (1853) initiated treatment: 71% with osteoporosis, 21% with osteopenia, and 5% with normal BMD with similar values in those with a prior major fracture (71%, 19%, 5%, respectively). Compared to women with osteoporosis, adjusted ORs for treatment of high risk women with osteopenia or normal BMD alone were 0.10 (95% CI 0.09-0.12) and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.04), respectively, and no higher in women with a prior major fracture (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84-1.19) or following introduction of treatment guidelines (p = 0.294). In summary, we found evidence that the diagnostic threshold for osteoporosis may serve as a disincentive to initiation of treatment in many women at high risk for incident fracture.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DXA; Fracture prevention; Fracture risk assessment; General population studies; Health services research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30008396     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  4 in total

1.  FRAX: a coming of age.

Authors:  W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Population-Based Osteoporosis Primary Prevention and Screening for Quality of Care in Osteoporosis, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Analysis of muscle, hip, and subcutaneous fat in osteoporosis patients with varying degrees of fracture risk using 3T Chemical Shift Encoded MRI.

Authors:  Dimitri Martel; Stephen Honig; Anmol Monga; Gregory Chang
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-03-24

4.  Fragility fracture identifies patients at imminent risk for subsequent fracture: real-world retrospective database study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Jonathan D Adachi; Jacques P Brown; Emil Schemitsch; Jean-Eric Tarride; Vivien Brown; Alan D Bell; Maureen Reiner; Millicent Packalen; Ponda Motsepe-Ditshego; Natasha Burke; Lubomira Slatkovska
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.