Literature DB >> 30008156

Implications of detection of foramen ovale patent after cryptogenic ischemic stroke.

Rita Marinheiro1, Leonor Parreira2, Pedro Amador2, Isabel Silvestre2, Carla Antunes2, Rui Caria2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic uncertainty is inherent in decisions in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke. We aimed to determine clinical implications of PFO identification in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after a cryptogenic ischemic stroke.
METHODS: Consecutive TEE done between 2011 and 2015 in patients with previous cryptogenic stroke was evaluated. Clinical implications of PFO identification (closure and/or medical therapy) were retrieved from the medical records and discharge summaries. Adverse events related to therapy, stroke recurrence and death were analyzed during follow-up.
RESULTS: Three-hundred one patients (mean age 59 ± 11 years; 61% male) underwent a TEE, of which 77 (26%) patients had a diagnosis of PFO. Patients with PFO were younger (56 ± 13 versus 60 ± 14, p = 0.03). Of those with PFO, 23 (30%) underwent percutaneous closure of PFO and these patients had more frequently complex or large PFO (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). The remaining 54 (70%) were treated with medical therapy: 30 (39%) with antiplatelet therapy and 24 (31%) with oral anticoagulation. During follow-up (44 ± 17 months), only two patients had another stroke (both referred for PFO closure, while they were waiting for the procedure) and two patients, on whom PFO closure was not performed, died (not for cardiovascular causes).
CONCLUSION: PFO's (size and complexity) and patients' characteristics influenced clinical decision when PFO was detected on TEE. The risk for recurrent stroke was not increased in patients who did not undergo PFO closure; although two patients waiting for PFO closure had recurrent stroke, demonstrating its importance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryptogenic stroke; Patent foramen ovale; Percutaneous closure; Transesophageal echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30008156     DOI: 10.1007/s12574-018-0388-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Echocardiogr        ISSN: 1349-0222


  19 in total

1.  Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  S Kaatz; D Ahmad; A C Spyropoulos; S Schulman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients.

Authors:  Michael Handke; Andreas Harloff; Manfred Olschewski; Andreas Hetzel; Annette Geibel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Echocardiographic findings in simple and complex patent foramen ovale before and after transcatheter closure.

Authors:  Antonio Vitarelli; Enrico Mangieri; Lidia Capotosto; Gaetano Tanzilli; Ilaria D'Angeli; Danilo Toni; Alessia Azzano; Serafino Ricci; Attilio Placanica; Ennio Rinaldi; Khaled Mukred; Giuseppe Placanica; Rasul Ashurov
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Transesophageal echocardiography in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emer R McGrath; Jeremy S Paikin; Bahareh Motlagh; Omid Salehian; Moira K Kapral; Martin J O'Donnell
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 5.  Recommendations for echocardiography use in the diagnosis and management of cardiac sources of embolism: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC).

Authors:  Mauro Pepi; Arturo Evangelista; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Frank A Flachskampf; George Athanassopoulos; Paolo Colonna; Gilbert Habib; E Bernd Ringelstein; Rosa Sicari; Jose Luis Zamorano; Marta Sitges; Pio Caso
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2010-07

6.  Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Anthony J Furlan; Mark Reisman; Joseph Massaro; Laura Mauri; Harold Adams; Gregory W Albers; Robert Felberg; Howard Herrmann; Saibal Kar; Michael Landzberg; Albert Raizner; Lawrence Wechsler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Patent Foramen Ovale Closure or Antiplatelet Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke.

Authors:  Lars Søndergaard; Scott E Kasner; John F Rhodes; Grethe Andersen; Helle K Iversen; Jens E Nielsen-Kudsk; Magnus Settergren; Christina Sjöstrand; Risto O Roine; David Hildick-Smith; J David Spence; Lars Thomassen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  David J Gladstone; Melanie Spring; Paul Dorian; Val Panzov; Kevin E Thorpe; Judith Hall; Haris Vaid; Martin O'Donnell; Andreas Laupacis; Robert Côté; Mukul Sharma; John A Blakely; Ashfaq Shuaib; Vladimir Hachinski; Shelagh B Coutts; Demetrios J Sahlas; Phil Teal; Samuel Yip; J David Spence; Brian Buck; Steve Verreault; Leanne K Casaubon; Andrew Penn; Daniel Selchen; Albert Jin; David Howse; Manu Mehdiratta; Karl Boyle; Richard Aviv; Moira K Kapral; Muhammad Mamdani
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke.

Authors:  John D Carroll; Jeffrey L Saver; David E Thaler; Richard W Smalling; Scott Berry; Lee A MacDonald; David S Marks; David L Tirschwell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism.

Authors:  Bernhard Meier; Bindu Kalesan; Heinrich P Mattle; Ahmed A Khattab; David Hildick-Smith; Dariusz Dudek; Grethe Andersen; Reda Ibrahim; Gerhard Schuler; Antony S Walton; Andreas Wahl; Stephan Windecker; Peter Jüni
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.