Literature DB >> 30007763

Creating space to discuss end-of-life issues in cancer care.

Dagoberto Cortez1, Douglas W Maynard2, Toby C Campbell3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Analyze entire oncology clinical visits and examine instances in which oncologists have to break the bad news that patients' treatments are no longer effective.
METHODS: Using conversation analysis we examine 128 audio recorded conversations between terminal cancer patients, their caregivers, and oncologists.
RESULTS: When oncologists break the bad news that a patient's treatment is no longer effective, they often use a conversational device we call an "exhausted current treatment" (ECT) statement, which avoids discussing prognosis in favor of further discussing treatment options. Analysis suggests that improving and prioritizing patient-centered care and shared decision making is possible if we first understand the social organization of clinical visits.
CONCLUSIONS: ECT statements and their movement towards discussing treatment options means that opportunities are bypassed for patients and caregivers to process or discuss scan results, and their prognostic implications. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: When oncologists and patients, by fixating on treatment options, bypass opportunities to discuss the meaning of scan results, they fail to realize other goals associated with prognostic awareness. Talking about what scans mean may add minutes to that part of the clinic visit, but can create efficiencies that conserve overall time. We recommend that oncologists, after delivering scan news, ask, "Would you like discuss what this means?".
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conversation analysis; End-of-life communication; Patient-centered care; Patient-physician interactions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30007763      PMCID: PMC6571206          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  6 in total

1.  Why many oncologists fail to share accurate prognoses: They care deeply for their patients.

Authors:  Eli Rowe Abernethy; Gavin Paul Campbell; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Opportunities to Improve Shared Decision Making in Dialysis Decisions for Older Adults with Life-Limiting Kidney Disease: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christopher J Zimmermann; Roy A Jhagroo; Maureen Wakeen; Kathryn Schueller; Amy Zelenski; Jennifer L Tucholka; Daniel A Fox; Nathan D Baggett; Anne Buffington; Toby C Campbell; Sara K Johnson; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Invoking death: How oncologists discuss a deadly outcome.

Authors:  Alexandra Tate
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Discussing Prognosis with Empathy to Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sophie Lelorain
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Mind your words: Oncologists' communication that potentially harms patients with advanced cancer: A survey on patient perspectives.

Authors:  Janine Westendorp; Andrea W M Evers; Jacqueline M L Stouthard; Janneke Budding; Elsken van der Wall; Nicole M F Plum; Mirjam Velting; Anneke L Francke; Sandra van Dulmen; Tim C Olde Hartman; Liesbeth M Van Vliet
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.921

Review 6.  Communicating with patients and families about illness progression and end of life: a review of studies using direct observation of clinical practice.

Authors:  Stuart Ekberg; Ruth Parry; Victoria Land; Katie Ekberg; Marco Pino; Charles Antaki; Laura Jenkins; Becky Whittaker
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.234

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.