Rachel Sayko Adams1, Cindy Parks Thomas2, Grant A Ritter1, Sue Lee1, Mayada Saadoun1, Thomas V Williams3, Mary Jo Larson1. 1. Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA. 2. Schneider Institute for Health Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA. 3. NORC at the University of Chicago, 225 Friend St, Boston, MA.
Abstract
Introduction: Little is known about long-term prescription opioid utilization in the Military Health System. The objectives of this study were to examine predictors of any prescription opioid receipt, and predictors of long-term opioid utilization among active duty soldiers in the year following deployment. Materials and Methods: The analytic sample consisted of Army active duty soldiers returning from deployment to Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn in fiscal years 2008-2014 (N = 540,738). The Heckman probit procedure was used to jointly examine predictors of any opioid prescription receipt and long-term opioid utilization (i.e., an episode of 90 days or longer where days-supply covered at least two-thirds of days) in the postdeployment year. Predictors were based on diagnoses and characteristics of opioid prescriptions. Results: More than one-third of soldiers (34.8%, n = 188,211) had opioid receipt, and among those soldiers, 3.3% had long-term opioid utilization (or 1.1% of the cohort, n = 6,188). The largest magnitude predictors of long-term opioid utilization were receiving a long-acting opioid within the first 30 days of the episode, diagnoses of chronic pain (no specified source), back/neck pain, or peripheral/central nervous system pain, and severe pain score in vital records. Conclusions: Soldiers returning from deployment were more likely to receive an opioid prescription than the overall active duty population, and 1.1% initiated a long-term opioid episode. We report a declining rate of opioid receipt and long-term opioid utilization among Army members from fiscal years 2008-2014. This study demonstrates that the most important predictors of opioid receipt were not demographic factors, but generally clinical indicators of acute pain or physical trauma.
Introduction: Little is known about long-term prescription opioid utilization in the Military Health System. The objectives of this study were to examine predictors of any prescription opioid receipt, and predictors of long-term opioid utilization among active duty soldiers in the year following deployment. Materials and Methods: The analytic sample consisted of Army active duty soldiers returning from deployment to Operation Enduring Freedom, Operation Iraqi Freedom, or Operation New Dawn in fiscal years 2008-2014 (N = 540,738). The Heckman probit procedure was used to jointly examine predictors of any opioid prescription receipt and long-term opioid utilization (i.e., an episode of 90 days or longer where days-supply covered at least two-thirds of days) in the postdeployment year. Predictors were based on diagnoses and characteristics of opioid prescriptions. Results: More than one-third of soldiers (34.8%, n = 188,211) had opioid receipt, and among those soldiers, 3.3% had long-term opioid utilization (or 1.1% of the cohort, n = 6,188). The largest magnitude predictors of long-term opioid utilization were receiving a long-acting opioid within the first 30 days of the episode, diagnoses of chronic pain (no specified source), back/neck pain, or peripheral/central nervous system pain, and severe pain score in vital records. Conclusions: Soldiers returning from deployment were more likely to receive an opioid prescription than the overall active duty population, and 1.1% initiated a long-term opioid episode. We report a declining rate of opioid receipt and long-term opioid utilization among Army members from fiscal years 2008-2014. This study demonstrates that the most important predictors of opioid receipt were not demographic factors, but generally clinical indicators of acute pain or physical trauma.
Authors: Robin L Toblin; Phillip J Quartana; Lyndon A Riviere; Kristina Clarke Walper; Charles W Hoge Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Susan V Eisen; Mark R Schultz; Dawne Vogt; Mark E Glickman; A Rani Elwy; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Princess E Osei-Bonsu; James Martin Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Steven P Cohen; Conner Nguyen; Shruti G Kapoor; Victoria C Anderson-Barnes; Leslie Foster; Cynthia Shields; Brian McLean; Todd Wichman; Anthony Plunkett Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-11-09
Authors: Rachel Sayko Adams; Deborah W Garnick; Alex H S Harris; Elizabeth L Merrick; Keith Hofmann; Wendy Funk; Thomas V Williams; Mary Jo Larson Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-05-07
Authors: Matthew N Jaffa; Jamie E Podell; Madeleine C Smith; Arshom Foroutan; Adam Kardon; Wan-Tsu W Chang; Melissa Motta; Gunjan Y Parikh; Kevin N Sheth; Neeraj Badjatia; Michael J Armahizer; J Marc Simard; Nicholas A Morris Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dominic Hodgkin; Rachel Sayko Adams; Grant Ritter; Sue Lee; Krista Beth Highland; Mary Jo Larson Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Patrick Richard; Mark R Bauer; Natalie Moresco; Regine Walker; Diana Bowser; Demarcio Reed; Mary Jo Larson Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Mayada Saadoun; Mark R Bauer; Rachel Sayko Adams; Krista Beth Highland; Mary Jo Larson Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 3.084